158 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38431159)
41. Applicant Interview Experiences and Postinterview Communication of the 2016 Radiation Oncology Match Cycle.
Berriochoa C; Ward MC; Weller MA; Holliday E; Kusano A; Thomas CR; Tendulkar RD
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2016 Nov; 96(3):514-20. PubMed ID: 27681747
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. The US Supreme Court Dobbs decision's impact on the future plans of 2023 residency graduates at the University of Utah.
Woodcock A; Carter G; Baayd J; Turok DK
Contraception; 2024 Feb; 130():110328. PubMed ID: 37977429
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Survey of Applicant Experience and Cost in the Urology Match: Opportunities for Reform.
Nikonow TN; Lyon TD; Jackman SV; Averch TD
J Urol; 2015 Oct; 194(4):1063-7. PubMed ID: 25912495
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Characterization of Applicant Preference Signals, Invitations for Interviews, and Inclusion on Match Lists for Residency Positions in Urology.
Grauer R; Ranti D; Greene K; Gorin MA; Menon M; Zorc S
JAMA Netw Open; 2023 Jan; 6(1):e2250974. PubMed ID: 36662528
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Applicants' Perspectives of the Urology Residency Match Process.
Khouri RK; Joyner BD; Lemack GE
Urol Pract; 2019 May; 6(3):185-190. PubMed ID: 37300094
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Abortion Provision and Delays to Care in a Clinic Network in Washington State After Dobbs.
Riley T; Fiastro AE; Benson LS; Khattar A; Prager S; Godfrey EM
JAMA Netw Open; 2024 May; 7(5):e2413847. PubMed ID: 38809551
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Gender Diversity in Urology Residency Program Leadership Is Associated With Gender Diversity in Residency Cohort.
Simhal RK; Shah YB; Wang KR; Martin J; Shah S; Wright A; D'Amico M; Leong JY; Lallas CD; Shenot PJ; Shah MS; Murphy AM
Urology; 2023 Jul; 177():222-226. PubMed ID: 37059231
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Effect of COVID-19 on Urology Residency Training: A Nationwide Survey of Program Directors by the Society of Academic Urologists.
Rosen GH; Murray KS; Greene KL; Pruthi RS; Richstone L; Mirza M
J Urol; 2020 Nov; 204(5):1039-1045. PubMed ID: 32463716
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Satisfaction With Abortion Training in an Abortion-Restrictive State.
Du A; Smith RM; Rivlin K
J Grad Med Educ; 2023 Oct; 15(5):551-557. PubMed ID: 37781426
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
50. Effect of United States Medical Licensing Examination Score Cutoffs on Recruitment of Underrepresented Applicants in the Urology Match.
Kaldany A; Patel HV; Gore A; Ahmed H; Ghodoussipour S; Park JH; Leitner DV; Jang TL
Urology; 2024 May; 187():25-30. PubMed ID: 38342381
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. The Dobbs Decision and Undergraduate Medical Education: The Unintended Consequences and Strategies to Optimize Reproductive Health and a Competent Workforce for the Future.
Stephenson-Famy A; Sonn T; Baecher-Lind L; Bhargava R; Chen KT; Fleming A; Kang Morgan H; Morosky CM; Schaffir JA; Madani Sims S; Sutton JM; Royce CS;
Acad Med; 2023 Apr; 98(4):431-435. PubMed ID: 36347017
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. What makes a medical student avoid or enter a career in urology? Results of an international survey.
Kerfoot BP; Nabha KS; Masser BA; McCullough DL
J Urol; 2005 Nov; 174(5):1953-7. PubMed ID: 16217365
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Mentorship in Urology Residency Programs in the United States.
Bortnick E; Stock J; Simma-Chiang V
Urology; 2020 Feb; 136():58-62. PubMed ID: 31738942
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. The COVID-19 Residency Application Cycle Did Not Affect Geographic Dispersal Patterns Among Applicants Entering the Urology Match: A Quantitative Mapping Study.
Gabrielson AT; Meilchen CK; Kohn JR; Kohn TP
Urology; 2021 Dec; 158():26-32. PubMed ID: 34324912
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. The impact of residency match information disseminated by a third-party website.
Kutikov A; Morgan TM; Resnick MJ
J Surg Educ; 2009; 66(4):212-5. PubMed ID: 19896626
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Gender Differences in the Urology Residency Match-Does It Make a Difference?
Aisen CM; Sui W; Pak JS; Pagano M; Cooper KL; Badalato GM
Urology; 2018 Jan; 111():39-43. PubMed ID: 28943372
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. The Fate of the Unmatched Urology Applicant.
Takele R; Patel ND; Greene KL; Dobbs RW
Urology; 2023 Jan; 171():29-34. PubMed ID: 36334769
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. The Presence of Gender Bias in Letters of Recommendations Written for Urology Residency Applicants.
Filippou P; Mahajan S; Deal A; Wallen EM; Tan HJ; Pruthi RS; Smith AB
Urology; 2019 Dec; 134():56-61. PubMed ID: 31491451
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Virtual Interviews Improve Equity and Wellbeing: Results of a Survey of Applicants to Obstetrics and Gynecology Subspecialty Fellowships.
Do Tran A; Heisler CA; Botros-Brey S; Wang H; Gaigbe-Togbe B; Leegant A; Hardart A
BMC Med Educ; 2022 Aug; 22(1):620. PubMed ID: 35971126
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Capturing the Perspective of Prospective Urology Applicants: Impacts of COVID-19 on Medical Education.
Hanson KA; Borofsky MS; Hampson LA; Breyer BN; Kern NG; Conti SL; Kielb SJ; Sorensen MD
Urology; 2020 Dec; 146():36-42. PubMed ID: 33007312
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
