128 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38431187)
1. Clinical performance of short fiber reinforced composite and glass hybrid on hypomineralized molars: A 36-month randomized split-mouth study.
Sen Yavuz B; Kaya R; Kodaman Dokumacigil N; Ozgur EG; Bekiroglu N; Kargul B
J Dent; 2024 May; 144():104919. PubMed ID: 38431187
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A Randomized Clinical Trial of Short Fiber Reinforced Composite and Glass Hybrid Restoration for Molars Affected by Molar Hypomineralization.
Kaya R; Yavuz BŞE; Dokumacıgil NK; Kargül B
Pediatr Dent; 2023 Jul; 45(4):292-300. PubMed ID: 37605356
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Eighteen-month clinical performance of composite resin restorations with two different adhesive systems for molars affected by molar incisor hypomineralization.
de Souza JF; Fragelli CB; Jeremias F; Paschoal MAB; Santos-Pinto L; de Cássia Loiola Cordeiro R
Clin Oral Investig; 2017 Jun; 21(5):1725-1733. PubMed ID: 27743215
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Randomized clinical trial of adhesive restorations in primary molars. 18-month results.
Casagrande L; Dalpian DM; Ardenghi TM; Zanatta FB; Balbinot CE; García-Godoy F; De Araujo FB
Am J Dent; 2013 Dec; 26(6):351-5. PubMed ID: 24640441
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Management of severity lesions of hypomineralized molars (MIH) with different treatment alternatives: 9-month results of a clinical trial.
Ozsoy M; Erken Gungor O
J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2024 May; 48(3):68-75. PubMed ID: 38755984
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Glass hybrid restorations as an alternative for restoring hypomineralized molars in the ART model.
Grossi JA; Cabral RN; Ribeiro APD; Leal SC
BMC Oral Health; 2018 Apr; 18(1):65. PubMed ID: 29669561
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Randomized controlled clinical trial of the 24-months survival of composite resin restorations after one-step incomplete and complete excavation on primary teeth.
Franzon R; Opdam NJ; Guimarães LF; Demarco FF; Casagrande L; Haas AN; Araujo FB
J Dent; 2015 Oct; 43(10):1235-41. PubMed ID: 26231301
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Split mouth randomized controlled clinical trial of beveled cavity preparations in primary molars: an 18-Month follow up.
Oliveira CA; Dias PF; Dos Santos MP; Maia LC
J Dent; 2008 Sep; 36(9):754-8. PubMed ID: 18579283
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A Clinical Evaluation of Deproteinization and Different Cavity Designs on Resin Restoration Performance in MIH-Affected Molars: Two-Year Results.
Sönmez H; Saat S
J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2017; 41(5):336-342. PubMed ID: 28872993
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. In vitro fracture resistance of molar teeth restored with a short fibre-reinforced composite material.
Fráter M; Forster A; Keresztúri M; Braunitzer G; Nagy K
J Dent; 2014 Sep; 42(9):1143-50. PubMed ID: 24859462
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Two-year clinical study on postoperative pulpal complications arising from the absence of a glass-ionomer lining in deep occlusal resin-composite restorations.
Banomyong D; Messer H
J Investig Clin Dent; 2013 Nov; 4(4):265-70. PubMed ID: 23355492
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A randomized trial of resin-based restorations in class I and class II beveled preparations in primary molars: 24-month results.
dos Santos MP; Passos M; Luiz RR; Maia LC
J Am Dent Assoc; 2009 Feb; 140(2):156-66; quiz 247-8. PubMed ID: 19188412
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Conventional versus resin-modified glass-ionomer cement for Class II restorations in primary molars. A 3-year clinical study.
Hübel S; Mejàre I
Int J Paediatr Dent; 2003 Jan; 13(1):2-8. PubMed ID: 12542617
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Clinical Performance of Direct Posterior Composite Restorations with and without Short Glass-fiber-reinforced Composite in Endodontically Treated Teeth: 3-year Results.
Tekçe N; Aydemir S; Demirci M; Tuncer S; Sancak Eİ; Baydemir C
J Adhes Dent; 2020; 22(2):127-137. PubMed ID: 32322834
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Effect of selective carious tissue removal on biomechanical behavior of class II bulk-fill dental composite restorations.
Silva PFD; Oliveira LRS; Braga SSL; Signori C; Armstrong SR; Soares CJ; Cenci MS; Faria-E-Silva AL
Dent Mater; 2018 Sep; 34(9):1289-1298. PubMed ID: 29793795
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Could bulk fill glass hybrid restorative materials replace composite resins in treating permanent teeth? A randomized controlled clinical trial.
Uyumaz FÜ; Abaklı İnci M; Özer H
J Esthet Restor Dent; 2024 May; 36(5):702-709. PubMed ID: 38108583
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Longevity and associated risk factors in adhesive restorations of young permanent teeth after complete and selective caries removal: a retrospective study.
Casagrande L; Seminario AT; Correa MB; Werle SB; Maltz M; Demarco FF; Araujo FB
Clin Oral Investig; 2017 Apr; 21(3):847-855. PubMed ID: 27103587
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Observational: prospective study of indirect pulp treatment in primary molars using resin-modified glass ionomer and 2% chlorhexidine gluconate: a 12-month Follow-up.
Rosenberg L; Atar M; Daronch M; Honig A; Chey M; Funny MD; Cruz L
Pediatr Dent; 2013; 35(1):13-7. PubMed ID: 23635886
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Two-Year Survival of High-Viscosity Glass Ionomer in Children with Molar Incisor Hypomineralization.
Durmus B; Sezer B; Tugcu N; Caliskan C; Bekiroglu N; Kargul B
Med Princ Pract; 2021; 30(1):73-79. PubMed ID: 32417844
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Randomised trial of resin-based restorations in Class I and Class II beveled preparations in primary molars: 48-month results.
Alves dos Santos MP; Luiz RR; Maia LC
J Dent; 2010 Jun; 38(6):451-9. PubMed ID: 20188783
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
