BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

121 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38431372)

  • 1. Evaluation of the effect of ozone disinfection on forensic identification of blood, saliva, and semen stains.
    Fejes V; Simon G; Makszin L; Sipos K; Poor VS
    Sci Justice; 2024 Mar; 64(2):151-158. PubMed ID: 38431372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The use of Polilight in the detection of seminal fluid, saliva, and bloodstains and comparison with conventional chemical-based screening tests.
    Vandenberg N; van Oorschot RA
    J Forensic Sci; 2006 Mar; 51(2):361-70. PubMed ID: 16566772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Applicability of ELISA detection of statherin for forensic identification of saliva.
    Akutsu T; Watanabe K; Fujinami Y; Sakurada K
    Int J Legal Med; 2010 Sep; 124(5):493-8. PubMed ID: 19953261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. White light reflectance spectroscopy biosensing system for fast quantitative prostate specific antigen determination in forensic samples.
    Koukouvinos G; Metheniti A; Karachaliou CE; Goustouridis D; Livaniou E; Misiakos K; Raptis I; Kondili A; Miniati P; Petrou P; Kakabakos S
    Talanta; 2017 Dec; 175():443-450. PubMed ID: 28842014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Direct-STR typing from presumptively-tested and untreated body fluids.
    Thanakiatkrai P; Raham K; Pradutkanchana J; Sotthibandhu S; Kitpipit T
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2017 Sep; 30():1-9. PubMed ID: 28605649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The evaluation and validation of Phadebas
    Wornes DJ; Speers SJ; Murakami JA
    Forensic Sci Int; 2018 Jul; 288():81-88. PubMed ID: 29734053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Amylase levels in semen and saliva stains.
    Auvdel MJ
    J Forensic Sci; 1986 Apr; 31(2):426-31. PubMed ID: 2423634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparative performance of the Phadebas® Forensic Press Test at room temperature and 37 °C for the detection of saliva stains on fabric exhibits.
    Woodford H; Mitchell N; Henry J
    Sci Justice; 2021 Mar; 61(2):170-174. PubMed ID: 33736849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Copan microFLOQ® Direct Swab collection of bloodstains, saliva, and semen on cotton cloth.
    Sherier AJ; Kieser RE; Novroski NMM; Wendt FR; King JL; Woerner AE; Ambers A; Garofano P; Budowle B
    Int J Legal Med; 2020 Jan; 134(1):45-54. PubMed ID: 31165261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Validation of the use of a commercially available kit for the identification of prostate specific antigen (PSA) in semen stains.
    Simich JP; Morris SL; Klick RL; Rittenhouse-Diakun K
    J Forensic Sci; 1999 Nov; 44(6):1229-31. PubMed ID: 10582360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of modern techniques for saliva screening.
    Myers JR; Adkins WK
    J Forensic Sci; 2008 Jul; 53(4):862-7. PubMed ID: 18503523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Recovery of DNA from SERATEC
    Conte J; Ruddy A; Domonoski L; Shanahan A; Daley N; McDevitt C; Roca G
    J Forensic Sci; 2022 May; 67(3):1176-1183. PubMed ID: 35182073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Applicability of two commercially available kits for forensic identification of saliva stains.
    Pang BC; Cheung BK
    J Forensic Sci; 2008 Sep; 53(5):1117-22. PubMed ID: 18637870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Determination of the biological attribute of evidence at the scene using reverse transcription PCR and real-time fluorescent quantitative PCR].
    Xu Y; Zhang C; Xu QW; Huang JP; Liu YN; Zou KN; Ping Y; Zhou HG
    Fa Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2013 Aug; 29(4):259-62. PubMed ID: 24350540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Messenger RNA profiling: a prototype method to supplant conventional methods for body fluid identification.
    Juusola J; Ballantyne J
    Forensic Sci Int; 2003 Aug; 135(2):85-96. PubMed ID: 12927408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The effect of mark enhancement techniques on the subsequent detection of saliva.
    McAllister P; Graham E; Deacon P; Farrugia KJ
    Sci Justice; 2016 Sep; 56(5):305-320. PubMed ID: 27702446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. PRECIPITIN REACTIONS IN FORENSIC PROBLEMS. A NEW METHOD FOR PRECIPITIN REACTIONS ON FORENSIC BLOOD, SEMEN AND SALIVA STAINS.
    CULLIFORD BJ
    Nature; 1964 Mar; 201():1092-3. PubMed ID: 14152779
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Developmental validation of RSID-saliva: a lateral flow immunochromatographic strip test for the forensic detection of saliva.
    Old JB; Schweers BA; Boonlayangoor PW; Reich KA
    J Forensic Sci; 2009 Jul; 54(4):866-73. PubMed ID: 19486436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of Four Saliva Detection Methods to Identify Expectorated Blood Spatter.
    Park HY; Son BN; Seo YI; Lim SK
    J Forensic Sci; 2015 Nov; 60(6):1571-6. PubMed ID: 26212779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Evaluation of mRNA-based approach for identification of saliva and semen.
    Sakurada K; Ikegaya H; Fukushima H; Akutsu T; Watanabe K; Yoshino M
    Leg Med (Tokyo); 2009 May; 11(3):125-8. PubMed ID: 19036626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.