These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

121 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3843412)

  • 1. Chest equalization radiography.
    Wandtke JC; Plewes DB
    J Thorac Imaging; 1985 Dec; 1(1):14-20. PubMed ID: 3843412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of scanning equalization and conventional chest radiography.
    Wandtke JC; Plewes DB
    Radiology; 1989 Sep; 172(3):641-5. PubMed ID: 2772170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Improved chest disease detection with scanning equalization radiography.
    Wandtke JC; Plewes DB
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1985 Nov; 145(5):979-83. PubMed ID: 3876756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Improved pulmonary nodule detection with scanning equalization radiography.
    Wandtke JC; Plewes DB; McFaul JA
    Radiology; 1988 Oct; 169(1):23-7. PubMed ID: 3420264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Rejection and redistribution of scattered radiation in scan equalization digital radiography (SEDR): simulation with spot images.
    Liu X; Shaw CC
    Med Phys; 2007 Jul; 34(7):2718-29. PubMed ID: 17821980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Common blind spots on chest CT: where are they all hiding? Part 1-airways, lungs, and pleura.
    Wu CC; Khorashadi L; Abbott GF; Gilman MD
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2013 Oct; 201(4):W533-8. PubMed ID: 24059389
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Digital slot-scan charge-coupled device radiography versus AMBER and Bucky screen-film radiography for detection of simulated nodules and interstitial disease in a chest phantom.
    Kroft LJ; Geleijns J; Mertens BJ; Veldkamp WJ; Zonderland HM; de Roos A
    Radiology; 2004 Apr; 231(1):156-63. PubMed ID: 14990807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Frequent errors in the interpretation of chest x-ray films].
    Vock P
    Schweiz Med Wochenschr; 1987 Jun; 117(24):928-32. PubMed ID: 3616585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Scanning equalization radiography of the chest: assessment of image quality.
    Wandtke JC; Plewes DP; Vogelstein E
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1985 Nov; 145(5):973-8. PubMed ID: 2931967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Multiple-beam equalization radiography in chest radiology. Image quality and radiation dose considerations.
    Axelsson B; Forsberg H; Hansson B; Haverling M
    Acta Radiol; 1991 Jan; 32(1):12-7. PubMed ID: 2012722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Processing alternatives for digital chest imaging.
    Johnson GA; Danieley N; Ravin CE
    Radiol Clin North Am; 1985 Jun; 23(2):335-40. PubMed ID: 3991890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. New techniques in chest radiography.
    Glazer HS; Muka E; Sagel SS; Jost RG
    Radiol Clin North Am; 1994 Jul; 32(4):711-29. PubMed ID: 8022976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Clinical evaluation of twin screen-film chest radiography: cost effective lung and mediastinal imaging.
    McLean D; Gray JE; Swensen SJ; Vrieze TJ
    Eur J Radiol; 1998 Mar; 27(1):61-6. PubMed ID: 9587769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Can digital selenium-based radiography in thoracic diagnosis replace the analog x-ray imaging technic?].
    Zähringer M; Krug B; Dölken W; Gossmann A; Lackner K
    Rofo; 1997 Jul; 167(1):4-10. PubMed ID: 9289041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. AMBER: a scanning multiple-beam equalization system for chest radiography.
    Vlasbloem H; Kool LJ
    Radiology; 1988 Oct; 169(1):29-34. PubMed ID: 3420279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Pacemaker wires. Difference in performance between AMBER and conventional chest radiography.
    Fransson SG
    Acta Radiol; 1993 Jul; 34(4):419-21. PubMed ID: 8318310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Digital storage phosphor imaging versus conventional film radiography in CT-documented chest disease.
    Schaefer CM; Greene R; Oestmann JW; Hall DA; Llewellyn HJ; McCarthy KA; Pile-Spellman ER; Rubens JR
    Radiology; 1990 Jan; 174(1):207-10. PubMed ID: 2294549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Lateral view of the thorax: the profile].
    Giron J; Sans N; Sénac JP
    J Radiol; 1999 Feb; 80(2):109-19. PubMed ID: 10209707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. One-shot dual-energy subtraction chest imaging with computed radiography: clinical evaluation of film images.
    Ishigaki T; Sakuma S; Ikeda M
    Radiology; 1988 Jul; 168(1):67-72. PubMed ID: 3289096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Nodule detection in digital chest radiography: effect of nodule location.
    Håkansson M; Båth M; Börjesson S; Kheddache S; Flinck A; Ullman G; Månsson LG
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):92-6. PubMed ID: 15933087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.