142 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38436289)
1. A cost-consequence model of using the 21-gene assay to identify patients with early-stage node-positive breast cancer who benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy in the Netherlands.
Simons MJHG; Machielsen PM; Spoorendonk JA; Ignacio T; Drost PB; Jacobs T; de Jongh FE
J Med Econ; 2024; 27(1):445-454. PubMed ID: 38436289
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Tumour profiling tests to guide adjuvant chemotherapy decisions in early breast cancer: a systematic review and economic analysis.
Harnan S; Tappenden P; Cooper K; Stevens J; Bessey A; Rafia R; Ward S; Wong R; Stein RC; Brown J
Health Technol Assess; 2019 Jun; 23(30):1-328. PubMed ID: 31264581
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Gene Expression Profiling Tests for Early-Stage Invasive Breast Cancer: A Health Technology Assessment.
Ontario Health (Quality)
Ont Health Technol Assess Ser; 2020; 20(10):1-234. PubMed ID: 32284770
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Gene expression profiling for guiding adjuvant chemotherapy decisions in women with early breast cancer: an evidence-based and economic analysis.
Medical Advisory Secretariat
Ont Health Technol Assess Ser; 2010; 10(23):1-57. PubMed ID: 23074401
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Cost effectiveness of gene expression profiling for early stage breast cancer: a decision-analytic model.
Yang M; Rajan S; Issa AM
Cancer; 2012 Oct; 118(20):5163-70. PubMed ID: 22359236
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Budget impact analysis of gene expression tests to aid therapy decisions for breast cancer patients in Germany.
Lux MP; Nabieva N; Hildebrandt T; Rebscher H; Kümmel S; Blohmer JU; Schrauder MG
Breast; 2018 Feb; 37():89-98. PubMed ID: 29128582
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Recommendations from the EGAPP Working Group: does the use of Oncotype DX tumor gene expression profiling to guide treatment decisions improve outcomes in patients with breast cancer?
Evaluation of Genomic Applications in Practice and Prevention (EGAPP) Working Group*
Genet Med; 2016 Aug; 18(8):770-9. PubMed ID: 26681310
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Impact of Oncotype DX breast Recurrence Score testing on adjuvant chemotherapy use in early breast cancer: Real world experience in Greater Manchester, UK.
Loncaster J; Armstrong A; Howell S; Wilson G; Welch R; Chittalia A; Valentine WJ; Bundred NJ
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2017 May; 43(5):931-937. PubMed ID: 28111076
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Economic evaluation of genomic test-directed chemotherapy for early-stage lymph node-positive breast cancer.
Hall PS; McCabe C; Stein RC; Cameron D
J Natl Cancer Inst; 2012 Jan; 104(1):56-66. PubMed ID: 22138097
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Initial experience with the Oncotype DX assay in decision-making for adjuvant therapy of early oestrogen receptor-positive breast cancer in Hong Kong.
Cheung PS; Tong AC; Leung RC; Kwan WH; Yau TC
Hong Kong Med J; 2014 Oct; 20(5):401-6. PubMed ID: 24948666
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Economic implications of 21-gene breast cancer risk assay from the perspective of an Israeli-managed health-care organization.
Klang SH; Hammerman A; Liebermann N; Efrat N; Doberne J; Hornberger J
Value Health; 2010; 13(4):381-7. PubMed ID: 20412544
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Economic assessment of the routine use of Oncotype DX® assay for early breast cancer in Franche-Comte region].
Nerich V; Curtit E; Bazan F; Montcuquet P; Villanueva C; Chaigneau L; Cals L; Méneveau N; Dobi E; Altmotlak H; Algros MP; Choulot MJ; Nallet G; Limat S; Mansion S; Pivot X
Bull Cancer; 2014; 101(7-8):681-9. PubMed ID: 25091650
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Long-term cost-effectiveness of Oncotype DX® versus current clinical practice from a Dutch cost perspective.
Kip M; Monteban H; Steuten L
J Comp Eff Res; 2015 Sep; 4(5):433-45. PubMed ID: 25872415
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Impact of Genomic Assay Testing and Clinical Factors on Chemotherapy Use After Implementation of Standardized Testing Criteria.
Natsuhara KH; Losk K; King TA; Lin NU; Camuso K; Golshan M; Pochebit S; Brock JE; Bunnell CA; Freedman RA
Oncologist; 2019 May; 24(5):595-602. PubMed ID: 30076279
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Cost-effectiveness analysis of multigene expression profiling assays to guide adjuvant therapy decisions in women with invasive early-stage breast cancer.
Hannouf MB; Zaric GS; Blanchette P; Brezden-Masley C; Paulden M; McCabe C; Raphael J; Brackstone M
Pharmacogenomics J; 2020 Feb; 20(1):27-46. PubMed ID: 31130722
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Oncotype DX
Rath MG; Uhlmann L; Fiedler M; Heil J; Golatta M; Dinkic C; Hennigs A; Schott S; Ernst V; Koch T; Sohn C; Brucker C; Rom J
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2018 Feb; 297(2):443-447. PubMed ID: 29236174
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The impact of the 21-gene Recurrence Score assay on clinical decision-making in node-positive (up to 3 positive nodes) estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer patients.
Stemmer SM; Klang SH; Ben-Baruch N; Geffen DB; Steiner M; Soussan-Gutman L; Merling S; Svedman C; Rizel S; Lieberman N
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2013 Jul; 140(1):83-92. PubMed ID: 23801158
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A decision impact, decision conflict and economic assessment of routine Oncotype DX testing of 146 women with node-negative or pNImi, ER-positive breast cancer in the U.K.
Holt S; Bertelli G; Humphreys I; Valentine W; Durrani S; Pudney D; Rolles M; Moe M; Khawaja S; Sharaiha Y; Brinkworth E; Whelan S; Jones S; Bennett H; Phillips CJ
Br J Cancer; 2013 Jun; 108(11):2250-8. PubMed ID: 23695023
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Implications of the 21-gene recurrence score assay (Oncotype DX) on adjuvant treatment decisions in ER-positive early-stage breast cancer patients: experience of Kuwait Cancer Control Center.
Fayaz S; Eissa HE; Demian GA
J Egypt Natl Canc Inst; 2020 Mar; 32(1):13. PubMed ID: 32372329
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Using the 21-gene assay to guide adjuvant chemotherapy decision-making in early-stage breast cancer: a cost-effectiveness evaluation in the German setting.
Blohmer JU; Rezai M; Kümmel S; Kühn T; Warm M; Friedrichs K; Benkow A; Valentine WJ; Eiermann W
J Med Econ; 2013; 16(1):30-40. PubMed ID: 22966753
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
