122 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38436374)
41. Prospective Study Comparing Two Second-Look Ultrasound Techniques: Handheld Ultrasound and an Automated Breast Volume Scanner.
Kim Y; Kang BJ; Kim SH; Lee EJ
J Ultrasound Med; 2016 Oct; 35(10):2103-12. PubMed ID: 27503758
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Automated breast ultrasound compared to hand-held ultrasound in surveillance after breast-conserving surgery.
Depretto C; Liguori A; Primolevo A; Di Cosimo S; Cartia F; Ferranti C; Scaperrotta GP
Tumori; 2021 Apr; 107(2):132-138. PubMed ID: 32552398
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Radiomics Analysis of Breast Lesions in Combination with Coronal Plane of ABVS and Strain Elastography.
Ma Q; Shen C; Gao Y; Duan Y; Li W; Lu G; Qin X; Zhang C; Wang J
Breast Cancer (Dove Med Press); 2023; 15():381-390. PubMed ID: 37260586
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. The Automated Breast Volume Scanner (ABVS): initial experiences in lesion detection compared with conventional handheld B-mode ultrasound: a pilot study of 50 cases.
Wojcinski S; Farrokh A; Hille U; Wiskirchen J; Gyapong S; Soliman AA; Degenhardt F; Hillemanns P
Int J Womens Health; 2011; 3():337-46. PubMed ID: 22114526
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Detection of breast lesions using an automated breast volume scanner system.
Zhang Q; Hu B; Hu B; Li WB
J Int Med Res; 2012; 40(1):300-6. PubMed ID: 22429369
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Comparison of 3D-Automated Breast Ultrasound With Handheld Breast Ultrasound Regarding Detection and BI-RADS Characterization of Lesions in Dense Breasts: A Study of 592 Cases.
Güldogan N; Yılmaz E; Arslan A; Küçükkaya F; Atila N; Arıbal E
Acad Radiol; 2022 Aug; 29(8):1143-1148. PubMed ID: 34955365
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Automated breast volume scanning versus conventional ultrasound in breast cancer screening.
Xiao Y; Zhou Q; Chen Z
Acad Radiol; 2015 Mar; 22(3):387-99. PubMed ID: 25620036
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Comparison of handheld ultrasound and automated breast ultrasound in women recalled after mammography screening.
Hellgren R; Dickman P; Leifland K; Saracco A; Hall P; Celebioglu F
Acta Radiol; 2017 May; 58(5):515-520. PubMed ID: 27565633
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Utility and Diagnostic Performance of Automated Breast Ultrasound System in Evaluating Pure Non-Mass Enhancement on Breast Magnetic Resonance Imaging.
Kwon BR; Chang JM; Kim SY; Lee SH; Shin SU; Yi A; Cho N; Moon WK
Korean J Radiol; 2020 Nov; 21(11):1210-1219. PubMed ID: 32729267
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Comparison of automated breast ultrasonography to handheld ultrasonography in detecting and diagnosing breast lesions.
Jeh SK; Kim SH; Choi JJ; Jung SS; Choe BJ; Park S; Park MS
Acta Radiol; 2016 Feb; 57(2):162-9. PubMed ID: 25766727
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Value of multimodal imaging in the diagnosis of breast sclerosing adenosis associated with malignant lesions.
Chen H; Bao L; Yu L; Sun H; Tan Y; Wei P; Zheng Z
J Clin Ultrasound; 2023 Mar; 51(3):485-493. PubMed ID: 36250329
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Automated breast ultrasound: lesion detection and BI-RADS classification--a pilot study.
Wenkel E; Heckmann M; Heinrich M; Schwab SA; Uder M; Schulz-Wendtland R; Bautz WA; Janka R
Rofo; 2008 Sep; 180(9):804-8. PubMed ID: 18704878
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Three-dimensional ultrasonography of the breast; An adequate replacement for MRI in neoadjuvant chemotherapy tumour response evaluation? - RESPONDER trial.
van Egdom LSE; Lagendijk M; Heijkoop EHM; Koning AHJ; van Deurzen CHM; Jager A; van Lankeren W; Koppert LB
Eur J Radiol; 2018 Jul; 104():94-100. PubMed ID: 29857873
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Radiologists' performance for detecting lesions and the interobserver variability of automated whole breast ultrasound.
Kim SH; Kang BJ; Choi BG; Choi JJ; Lee JH; Song BJ; Choe BJ; Park S; Kim H
Korean J Radiol; 2013; 14(2):154-63. PubMed ID: 23482698
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. The performance of 3D ABUS versus HHUS in the visualisation and BI-RADS characterisation of breast lesions in a large cohort of 1,886 women.
Vourtsis A; Kachulis A
Eur Radiol; 2018 Feb; 28(2):592-601. PubMed ID: 28828640
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Automated Versus Handheld Breast Ultrasound for Evaluating Axillary Lymph Nodes in Patients With Breast Cancer.
Kim SM; Jang M; Yun B; Shin SU; Rim J; Kang E; Kim EK; Shin HC; Park SY; Kim B
Korean J Radiol; 2024 Feb; 25(2):146-156. PubMed ID: 38238017
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Analysis of false-negative readings of automated breast ultrasound studies.
Grubstein A; Rapson Y; Gadiel I; Cohen M
J Clin Ultrasound; 2017 Jun; 45(5):245-251. PubMed ID: 28295423
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Breast cancer staging: Combined digital breast tomosynthesis and automated breast ultrasound versus magnetic resonance imaging.
Girometti R; Tomkova L; Cereser L; Zuiani C
Eur J Radiol; 2018 Oct; 107():188-195. PubMed ID: 30292265
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Interobserver agreement for sonograms of breast lesions obtained by an automated breast volume scanner.
Zhang J; Lai XJ; Zhu QL; Wang HY; Jiang YX; Liu H; Dai Q; You SS; Xiao MS; Sun Q
Eur J Radiol; 2012 Sep; 81(9):2179-83. PubMed ID: 21724355
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Automated Breast Volume Scanning: Identifying 3-D Coronal Plane Imaging Features May Help Categorize Complex Cysts.
Wang HY; Jiang YX; Zhu QL; Zhang J; Xiao MS; Liu H; Dai Q; Li JC; Sun Q
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2016 Mar; 42(3):689-98. PubMed ID: 26742895
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
