These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

107 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38437449)

  • 1. Psychophysical determination of boundaries and smoothness of color gradients.
    Xiong N; Shamey R
    J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis; 2024 Mar; 41(3):572-580. PubMed ID: 38437449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Investigations of suprathreshold color-difference tolerances with different visual scales and different perceptual correlates using CRT colors.
    Wang Z; Xu H
    J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis; 2008 Dec; 25(12):2908-17. PubMed ID: 19037380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. CIEDE2000 lightness, chroma and hue human gingiva thresholds.
    Pérez MM; Carrillo-Perez F; Tejada-Casado M; Ruiz-López J; Benavides-Reyes C; Herrera LJ
    J Dent; 2022 Sep; 124():104213. PubMed ID: 35793761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Lightness, chroma and hue differences on visual shade matching.
    Pecho OE; Pérez MM; Ghinea R; Della Bona A
    Dent Mater; 2016 Nov; 32(11):1362-1373. PubMed ID: 27614615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Perceived speed of changing color in chroma and hue directions in CIELAB.
    Kong X; Murdoch MJ; Vogels I; Sekulovski D; Heynderickx I
    J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis; 2019 Jun; 36(6):1022-1032. PubMed ID: 31158133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Investigating unique hues at different chroma levels with a smaller hue angle step.
    Bao W; Wei M; Xiao K
    J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis; 2020 Apr; 37(4):671-679. PubMed ID: 32400551
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Variations in normal color vision. VII. Relationships between color naming and hue scaling.
    Emery KJ; Volbrecht VJ; Peterzell DH; Webster MA
    Vision Res; 2017 Dec; 141():66-75. PubMed ID: 28042057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Maximum likelihood conjoint measurement of lightness and chroma.
    Rogers M; Knoblauch K; Franklin A
    J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis; 2016 Mar; 33(3):A184-93. PubMed ID: 26974923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Surface properties and the perception of color.
    Isherwood ZJ; Huynh-Thu Q; Arnison M; Monaghan D; Toscani M; Perry S; Honson V; Kim J
    J Vis; 2021 Feb; 21(2):7. PubMed ID: 33576764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Perceptual holistic color combination analysis of Papilionidae butterflies as aesthetic objects.
    Kakehashi E; Muramatsu K; Hibino H
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(10):e0240356. PubMed ID: 33112869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Unique hue stimulus selection using Munsell color chips under different chroma levels and illumination conditions.
    Shamey R; Zubair M; Cheema H
    J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis; 2019 Jun; 36(6):983-993. PubMed ID: 31158129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Erratum: High-Throughput Identification of Resistance to Pseudomonas syringae pv. Tomato in Tomato using Seedling Flood Assay.
    J Vis Exp; 2023 Oct; (200):. PubMed ID: 37851522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Measuring color differences in automotive samples with lightness flop: a test of the AUDI2000 color-difference formula.
    Melgosa M; Martínez-García J; Gómez-Robledo L; Perales E; Martínez-Verdú FM; Dauser T
    Opt Express; 2014 Feb; 22(3):3458-67. PubMed ID: 24663636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Experimental investigations into visual and electronic tooth color measurement.
    Ratzmann A; Treichel A; Langforth G; Gedrange T; Welk A
    Biomed Tech (Berl); 2011 Apr; 56(2):115-22. PubMed ID: 21453129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. All effects of psychophysical variables on color attributes: a classification system.
    Pridmore RW; Melgosa M
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(4):e0119024. PubMed ID: 25859845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Psychophysical evaluation of gamut mapping techniques using simple rendered images and artificial gamut boundaries.
    Montag ED; Fairchild MD
    IEEE Trans Image Process; 1997; 6(7):977-89. PubMed ID: 18282988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Rapid Communication: Effect of machine, anatomical location, and replication on instrumental color of boneless pork loins.
    Barkley KE; Fields B; Dilger AC; Boler DD
    J Anim Sci; 2018 Jun; 96(7):2747-2752. PubMed ID: 29878230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Color-difference evaluation for digital images using a categorical judgment method.
    Liu H; Huang M; Cui G; Luo MR; Melgosa M
    J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis; 2013 Apr; 30(4):616-26. PubMed ID: 23595320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Tooth Shade Preferences among the General Public.
    Almufleh B; Emami E; Al-Khateeb A; Del Monte S; Tamimi F
    J Prosthodont; 2020 Aug; 29(7):564-572. PubMed ID: 32548899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of the color of natural teeth measured by a colorimeter and Shade Vision System.
    Cho BH; Lim YK; Lee YK
    Dent Mater; 2007 Oct; 23(10):1307-12. PubMed ID: 17178151
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.