These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

130 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38437917)

  • 1. Comparison of facet fusion rates and clinical outcomes between cortical bone trajectory screw and percutaneous pedicle screw fixation for degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis.
    Miyashita T; Kato K; Yunde A; Ataka H; Tanno T
    Spine J; 2024 Jul; 24(7):1202-1210. PubMed ID: 38437917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Safety and Efficacy of Cortical Bone Trajectory Screw Fixation Combined with Facet Fusion for the Treatment of Lumbar Degenerative Disease.
    Kong X; Li B; Xu L; Li J; Gao C; Wu D; Ma S; Song Y; Zhao J; Wang X
    Orthop Surg; 2023 Jun; 15(6):1617-1626. PubMed ID: 37199023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Good 5-year postoperative outcomes after facet fusion using a percutaneous pedicle screw system for degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis.
    Miyashita T; Ataka H; Kato K; Tanno T
    Neurosurg Rev; 2022 Jun; 45(3):2269-2276. PubMed ID: 35099669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Good clinical outcomes and fusion rate of facet fusion with a percutaneous pedicle screw system for degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis: minimally invasive evolution of posterolateral fusion.
    Miyashita T; Ataka H; Kato K; Tanno T
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2015 May; 40(9):E552-7. PubMed ID: 25705957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Posterior lumbar interbody fusion with cortical bone trajectory screw fixation versus posterior lumbar interbody fusion using traditional pedicle screw fixation for degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis: a comparative study.
    Sakaura H; Miwa T; Yamashita T; Kuroda Y; Ohwada T
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2016 Nov; 25(5):591-595. PubMed ID: 27231813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Cortical bone trajectory screw fixation versus traditional pedicle screw fixation for 2-level posterior lumbar interbody fusion: comparison of surgical outcomes for 2-level degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis.
    Sakaura H; Miwa T; Yamashita T; Kuroda Y; Ohwada T
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2018 Jan; 28(1):57-62. PubMed ID: 29125430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Early cephalad adjacent segment degeneration after posterior lumbar interbody fusion: a comparative study between cortical bone trajectory screw fixation and traditional trajectory screw fixation.
    Sakaura H; Ikegami D; Fujimori T; Sugiura T; Mukai Y; Hosono N; Fuji T
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2020 Feb; 32(2):155-159. PubMed ID: 31628292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A Comparison Between Cortical Bone Trajectory Screws And Traditional Pedicle Screws in Patients With Single-Level Lumbar Degenerative Spondylolisthesis: Five-Year Results.
    Kwon JW; Park Y; Lee BH; Park SY; Lim CK; Yang JH; Ha JW; Suk KS; Moon SH; Kim HS
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2023 Nov; 48(22):1617-1625. PubMed ID: 36730849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Clinical Outcomes After Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion: Comparison of Cortical Bone Trajectory and Conventional Pedicle Screw Insertion.
    Takenaka S; Mukai Y; Tateishi K; Hosono N; Fuji T; Kaito T
    Clin Spine Surg; 2017 Dec; 30(10):E1411-E1418. PubMed ID: 28266955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion with cortical bone trajectory screws versus traditional pedicle screws fixation: a study protocol of randomised controlled trial.
    Feng Z; Li X; Tang Q; Wang C; Zheng W; Zhang H; Wu AM; Tian N; Wu Y; Ni W
    BMJ Open; 2017 Oct; 7(10):e017227. PubMed ID: 29061616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. One-Year Prospective Evaluation of the Technique of Percutaneous Cortical Bone Trajectory Spondylodesis in Comparison with Percutaneous Pedicle Screw Fixation: A Preliminary Report with Technical Note.
    Orita S; Inage K; Kubota G; Sainoh T; Sato J; Fujimoto K; Shiga Y; Nakamura J; Matsuura Y; Eguchi Y; Aoki Y; Toyone T; Yamauchi K; Sakuma Y; Oikawa Y; Suzuki T; Takahashi K; Hynes RA; Ohtori S
    J Neurol Surg A Cent Eur Neurosurg; 2016 Nov; 77(6):531-537. PubMed ID: 27023825
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The Fusion Rate of Cortical Bone Trajectory Screw Fixation and Pedicle Screw Fixations in L4-5 Interbody Fusion: A Retrospective Cohort Study.
    Lin Y; Xu J; Zheng W
    Orthop Surg; 2023 May; 15(5):1281-1288. PubMed ID: 37073082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparative clinical efficacy and safety of cortical bone trajectory screw fixation and traditional pedicle screw fixation in posterior lumbar fusion: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Wang J; He X; Sun T
    Eur Spine J; 2019 Jul; 28(7):1678-1689. PubMed ID: 31087165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Revisions for screw malposition and clinical outcomes after robot-guided lumbar fusion for spondylolisthesis.
    Schröder ML; Staartjes VE
    Neurosurg Focus; 2017 May; 42(5):E12. PubMed ID: 28463610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparative effectiveness of cortical bone trajectory screws and pedicle screws in the treatment of adjacent segment degeneration after lumbar fusion surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Shang Q; Luan H; Peng C; Song X
    J Orthop Surg Res; 2024 Jun; 19(1):380. PubMed ID: 38943143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Pedicle screw shift without loosening following instrumented posterior fusion: limitations of pedicle screw fixation.
    Miyashita T; Ataka H; Kato K; Takaoka H; Tanno T
    Neurosurg Rev; 2019 Sep; 42(3):691-698. PubMed ID: 30187295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of adjacent segment degeneration after successful posterolateral fusion with unilateral or bilateral pedicle screw instrumentation: a minimum 10-year follow-up.
    Kim TH; Lee BH; Moon SH; Lee SH; Lee HM
    Spine J; 2013 Oct; 13(10):1208-16. PubMed ID: 24075027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Comparison of Clinical Effects of Cortical Bone Trajectory Screws and Traditional Pedicle Screws in Posterior Lumbar Fusion].
    Zhang X; Gu Z; Zhang Y; Li G
    Sichuan Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2024 Mar; 55(2):303-308. PubMed ID: 38645868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Mid-term clinical results of minimally invasive decompression and posterolateral fusion with percutaneous pedicle screws versus conventional approach for degenerative spondylolisthesis with spinal stenosis.
    Kotani Y; Abumi K; Ito M; Sudo H; Abe Y; Minami A
    Eur Spine J; 2012 Jun; 21(6):1171-7. PubMed ID: 22173610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Radiographic feasibility study of cortical bone trajectory and traditional pedicle screw dual trajectories.
    Mullin JP; Perlmutter B; Schmidt E; Benzel E; Steinmetz MP
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2016 Dec; 25(6):727-732. PubMed ID: 27391396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.