138 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38438182)
21. Extended-field radiotherapy for locally advanced cervical cancer.
Thamronganantasakul K; Supakalin N; Kietpeerakool C; Pattanittum P; Lumbiganon P
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2018 Oct; 10(10):CD012301. PubMed ID: 30362204
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Adjuvant platinum-based chemotherapy for early stage cervical cancer.
Rosa DD; Medeiros LR; Edelweiss MI; Pohlmann PR; Stein AT
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2012 Jun; 6(6):CD005342. PubMed ID: 22696349
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Surgery for early stage cervical cancer: how radical should it be?
Reade CJ; Eiriksson LR; Covens A
Gynecol Oncol; 2013 Oct; 131(1):222-30. PubMed ID: 23863357
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Fertility sparing therapy in women with lymph node negative cervical cancer >2cm - oncologic and fertility outcomes of neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by radical vaginal trachelectomy.
Plaikner A; Siegler K; Hertel H; Jacob A; Petzel A; Schubert M; Blohmer JU; Böhmer G; Marnitz S; Ragosch V; Domröse C; Oppelt P; Jülicher A; Schneider A; Willems A; Favero G; Köhler C
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2023 Oct; 33(10):1542-1547. PubMed ID: 37696645
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Survival of women with microinvasive adenocarcinoma of the cervix is not improved by radical surgery.
Bean LM; Ward KK; Plaxe SC; McHale MT
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Sep; 217(3):332.e1-332.e6. PubMed ID: 28522318
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Open vs minimally invasive radical trachelectomy in early-stage cervical cancer: International Radical Trachelectomy Assessment Study.
Salvo G; Ramirez PT; Leitao MM; Cibula D; Wu X; Falconer H; Persson J; Perrotta M; Mosgaard BJ; Kucukmetin A; Berlev I; Rendon G; Liu K; Vieira M; Capilna ME; Fotopoulou C; Baiocchi G; Kaidarova D; Ribeiro R; Pedra-Nobre S; Kocian R; Li X; Li J; Pálsdóttir K; Noll F; Rundle S; Ulrikh E; Hu Z; Gheorghe M; Saso S; Bolatbekova R; Tsunoda A; Pitcher B; Wu J; Urbauer D; Pareja R
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2022 Jan; 226(1):97.e1-97.e16. PubMed ID: 34461074
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Conization and lymph node evaluation in low-risk cervical cancer. Is it time to avoid radical surgery? Retrospective series and literature review.
Lucchini SM; Ferreyra HD; Landeros J; Esteban A; Donetch G; Goldsman MG; Borla HF; Heredia F
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2021 Nov; 266():163-168. PubMed ID: 34673464
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Postoperative nomogram for the prediction of disease-free survival in lymph node-negative stage I-IIA cervical cancer patients treated with radical hysterectomy.
Gülseren V; Kocaer M; Çakır İ; Özdemir İA; Sancı M; Güngördük K
J Obstet Gynaecol; 2020 Jul; 40(5):699-704. PubMed ID: 31607197
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Radical vaginal hysterectomy with extraperitoneal pelvic lymphadenectomy in cervical cancer.
Savino L; Borruto F; Comparetto C; Massi GB
Eur J Gynaecol Oncol; 2001; 22(1):31-5. PubMed ID: 11321490
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Definitive pelvic radiotherapy for patients with newly diagnosed stage IVB cervical cancer: a systematic review.
Viveros-Carreño D; Vieira-Serna S; Grillo-Ardila CF; Rodriguez J; Mora-Soto N; Jhingran A; Ramirez PT; Pareja R
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2023 Jul; 33(7):1057-1062. PubMed ID: 37192760
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Completion of radical hysterectomy does not improve survival of patients with cervical cancer and intraoperatively detected lymph node involvement: ABRAX international retrospective cohort study.
Cibula D; Dostalek L; Hillemanns P; Scambia G; Jarkovsky J; Persson J; Raspagliesi F; Novak Z; Jaeger A; Capilna ME; Weinberger V; Klat J; Schmidt RL; Lopez A; Scibilia G; Pareja R; Kucukmetin A; Kreitner L; El-Balat A; Pereira GJR; Laufhütte S; Isla-Ortiz D; Toptas T; Gil-Ibanez B; Vergote I; Runnenbaum I
Eur J Cancer; 2021 Jan; 143():88-100. PubMed ID: 33290995
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Oncological outcomes of nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer: a systematic review.
Basaran D; Dusek L; Majek O; Cibula D
Ann Surg Oncol; 2015 Sep; 22(9):3033-40. PubMed ID: 25613389
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of laparoscopic radical hysterectomy vs. Robotic assisted radical hysterectomy for early stage cervical cancer.
Marchand G; Taher Masoud A; Abdelsattar A; King A; Brazil G; Ulibarri H; Parise J; Arroyo A; Coriell C; Goetz S; Moir C; Baruelo G; Govindan M
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2023 Oct; 289():190-202. PubMed ID: 37690282
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Meta-analysis of laparoscopic radical hysterectomy, excluding robotic assisted versus open radical hysterectomy for early stage cervical cancer.
Marchand G; Masoud AT; Abdelsattar A; King A; Ulibarri H; Parise J; Arroyo A; Coriell C; Goetz S; Moir C; Moberly A; Govindan M
Sci Rep; 2023 Jan; 13(1):273. PubMed ID: 36609438
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Pre-operative surgical algorithm: sentinel lymph node biopsy as predictor of parametrial involvement in early-stage cervical cancer.
Balaya V; Bresset A; Guani B; Benoit L; Magaud L; Bonsang-Kitzis H; Ngo C; Mathevet P; Lécuru F;
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2020 Sep; 30(9):1317-1325. PubMed ID: 32753560
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Conservative surgery in early-stage cervical cancer: what percentage of patients may be eligible for conization and lymphadenectomy?
Smith AL; Frumovitz M; Schmeler KM; dos Reis R; Nick AM; Coleman RL; Ramirez PT
Gynecol Oncol; 2010 Nov; 119(2):183-6. PubMed ID: 20708227
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Diagnostic accuracy of sentinel lymph node frozen section analysis in patients with early-stage cervical cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Agustí N; Viveros-Carreño D; Mora-Soto N; Ramírez PT; Rauh-Hain A; Wu CF; Rodríguez J; Grillo-Ardila CF; Salazar C; Jorgensen K; Segarra-Vidal B; Chacón E; Melamed A; Pareja R
Gynecol Oncol; 2023 Oct; 177():157-164. PubMed ID: 37703622
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Risk factors of pelvic lymph node metastasis in cervical adenocarcinoma following radical hysterectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy.
Yanaranop M; Sathapornteera N; Nakrangsee S
J Med Assoc Thai; 2014 Nov; 97 Suppl 11():S87-95. PubMed ID: 25509701
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Type II or type III radical hysterectomy compared to chemoradiotherapy as a primary intervention for stage IB2 cervical cancer.
Nama V; Angelopoulos G; Twigg J; Murdoch JB; Bailey J; Lawrie TA
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2018 Oct; 10(10):CD011478. PubMed ID: 30311942
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. [Radical hysterectomy with pelvic lymphadenectomy in patients with carcinoma of the uterine cervix--3 years' experience].
Bosković V; Glisić A; Petković S
Srp Arh Celok Lek; 1998; 126(5-6):183-7. PubMed ID: 9863378
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
