These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

146 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38440249)

  • 21. Classifiers in Mandarin Chinese: Behavioral and electrophysiological evidence regarding their representation and processing.
    Huang S; Schiller NO
    Brain Lang; 2021 Mar; 214():104889. PubMed ID: 33493973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Thematic orders and the comprehension of subject-extracted relative clauses in Mandarin Chinese.
    Lin CJ
    Front Psychol; 2015; 6():1255. PubMed ID: 26441697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Investigating the Processing of Relative Clauses in Mandarin Chinese: Evidence from Eye-Movement Data.
    Sung YT; Cha JH; Tu JY; Wu MD; Lin WC
    J Psycholinguist Res; 2016 Oct; 45(5):1089-113. PubMed ID: 26385782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Chinese subject-relative clauses are more difficult to process than the object-relative clauses.
    Chen B; Ning A; Bi H; Dunlap S
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2008 Sep; 129(1):61-5. PubMed ID: 18538740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Disambiguation and Integration in Korean Relative Clause Processing.
    Mansbridge M; Park S; Tamaoka K
    J Psycholinguist Res; 2017 Aug; 46(4):827-845. PubMed ID: 27943081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. The count-mass distinction in typically developing and grammatically specifically language impaired children: new evidence on the role of syntax and semantics.
    Froud K; van der Lely HK
    J Commun Disord; 2008; 41(3):274-303. PubMed ID: 18206904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Sentence integration processes: an ERP study of Chinese sentence comprehension with relative clauses.
    Yang CL; Perfetti CA; Liu Y
    Brain Lang; 2010 Feb; 112(2):85-100. PubMed ID: 20006378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Children's comprehension of relative clauses.
    de Villiers JG; Flusberg HB; Hakuta K; Cohen M
    J Psycholinguist Res; 1979 Sep; 8(5):499-518. PubMed ID: 490445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Context effects in syntactic ambiguity resolution: discourse and semantic influences in parsing reduced relative clauses.
    Spivey-Knowlton MJ; Trueswell JC; Tanenhaus MK
    Can J Exp Psychol; 1993 Jun; 47(2):276-309. PubMed ID: 8364532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Eye movements and processing difficulty in object relative clauses.
    Staub A
    Cognition; 2010 Jul; 116(1):71-86. PubMed ID: 20427040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Bilingual deaf readers' use of semantic and syntactic cues in the processing of English relative clauses.
    Piñar P; Carlson MT; Morford JP; Dussias PE
    Biling (Camb Engl); 2017 Nov; 20(5):980-998. PubMed ID: 29308049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. The Role of Animacy and Structural Information in Relative Clause Attachment: Evidence From Chinese.
    Kwon N; Ong D; Chen H; Zhang A
    Front Psychol; 2019; 10():1576. PubMed ID: 31379652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Semantic Processing Persists despite Anomalous Syntactic Category: ERP Evidence from Chinese Passive Sentences.
    Yang Y; Wu F; Zhou X
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(6):e0131936. PubMed ID: 26125621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Effects of syntactic structure on the processing of lexical repetition during sentence reading.
    Lowder MW; Cardoso A; Pittman M; Zhou A
    Mem Cognit; 2023 Jul; 51(5):1249-1263. PubMed ID: 36581728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Processing relative clauses in Chinese.
    Hsiao F; Gibson E
    Cognition; 2003 Nov; 90(1):3-27. PubMed ID: 14597268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Iconicity affects children's comprehension of complex sentences: The role of semantics, clause order, input and individual differences.
    de Ruiter LE; Theakston AL; Brandt S; Lieven EVM
    Cognition; 2018 Feb; 171():202-224. PubMed ID: 29197241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Lexico-Semantic Influence on Syntactic Processing: An Eye-Tracking Study with Spanish Relative Clauses.
    Álvarez-García E; Igoa González JM
    Brain Sci; 2023 Feb; 13(3):. PubMed ID: 36979219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Processing relative clauses varying on syntactic and semantic dimensions: an analysis with event-related potentials.
    Mecklinger A; Schriefers H; Steinhauer K; Friederici AD
    Mem Cognit; 1995 Jul; 23(4):477-94. PubMed ID: 7666761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. A hierarchical linear modeling analysis of working memory and implicit prosody in the resolution of adjunct attachment ambiguity.
    Traxler MJ
    J Psycholinguist Res; 2009 Oct; 38(5):491-509. PubMed ID: 19377881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. No Morphological Markers, No Problem: ERP Study Reveals Semantic Contribution to Distinct Neural Substrates Between Noun and Verb Processing in Online Sentence Comprehension.
    Feng J; Gong T; Shuai L; Wu Y
    Front Neurosci; 2019; 13():957. PubMed ID: 31551705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.