These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

123 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38440907)

  • 1. Genebe.net: Implementation and validation of an automatic ACMG variant pathogenicity criteria assignment.
    Stawiński P; Płoski R
    Clin Genet; 2024 Aug; 106(2):119-126. PubMed ID: 38440907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. InterVar: Clinical Interpretation of Genetic Variants by the 2015 ACMG-AMP Guidelines.
    Li Q; Wang K
    Am J Hum Genet; 2017 Feb; 100(2):267-280. PubMed ID: 28132688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. ClinGen Pathogenicity Calculator: a configurable system for assessing pathogenicity of genetic variants.
    Patel RY; Shah N; Jackson AR; Ghosh R; Pawliczek P; Paithankar S; Baker A; Riehle K; Chen H; Milosavljevic S; Bizon C; Rynearson S; Nelson T; Jarvik GP; Rehm HL; Harrison SM; Azzariti D; Powell B; Babb L; Plon SE; Milosavljevic A;
    Genome Med; 2017 Jan; 9(1):3. PubMed ID: 28081714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Good performance of the criteria of American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics/Association for Molecular Pathology in prediction of pathogenicity of genetic variants causing thoracic aortic aneurysms and dissections.
    Ponińska JK; Bilińska ZT; Truszkowska G; Michalak E; Podgórska A; Stępień-Wojno M; Chmielewski P; Lutyńska A; Płoski R
    J Transl Med; 2022 Jan; 20(1):42. PubMed ID: 35078481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Variant Classification for Pompe disease; ACMG/AMP specifications from the ClinGen Lysosomal Diseases Variant Curation Expert Panel.
    Goldstein JL; McGlaughon J; Kanavy D; Goomber S; Pan Y; Deml B; Donti T; Kearns L; Seifert BA; Schachter M; Son RG; Thaxton C; Udani R; Bali D; Baudet H; Caggana M; Hung C; Kyriakopoulou L; Rosenblum L; Steiner R; Pinto E Vairo F; Wang Y; Watson M; Fernandez R; Weaver M; Clarke L; Rehder C
    Mol Genet Metab; 2023; 140(1-2):107715. PubMed ID: 37907381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evaluation of in silico algorithms for use with ACMG/AMP clinical variant interpretation guidelines.
    Ghosh R; Oak N; Plon SE
    Genome Biol; 2017 Nov; 18(1):225. PubMed ID: 29179779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Specifications of the ACMG/AMP variant curation guidelines for the analysis of germline CDH1 sequence variants.
    Lee K; Krempely K; Roberts ME; Anderson MJ; Carneiro F; Chao E; Dixon K; Figueiredo J; Ghosh R; Huntsman D; Kaurah P; Kesserwan C; Landrith T; Li S; Mensenkamp AR; Oliveira C; Pardo C; Pesaran T; Richardson M; Slavin TP; Spurdle AB; Trapp M; Witkowski L; Yi CS; Zhang L; Plon SE; Schrader KA; Karam R
    Hum Mutat; 2018 Nov; 39(11):1553-1568. PubMed ID: 30311375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. MAGI-ACMG: Algorithm for the Classification of Variants According to ACMG and ACGS Recommendations.
    Cristofoli F; Daja M; Maltese PE; Guerri G; Tanzi B; Miotto R; Bonetti G; Miertus J; Chiurazzi P; Stuppia L; Gatta V; Cecchin S; Bertelli M; Marceddu G
    Genes (Basel); 2023 Aug; 14(8):. PubMed ID: 37628650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Variant Classification Concordance using the ACMG-AMP Variant Interpretation Guidelines across Nine Genomic Implementation Research Studies.
    Amendola LM; Muenzen K; Biesecker LG; Bowling KM; Cooper GM; Dorschner MO; Driscoll C; Foreman AKM; Golden-Grant K; Greally JM; Hindorff L; Kanavy D; Jobanputra V; Johnston JJ; Kenny EE; McNulty S; Murali P; Ou J; Powell BC; Rehm HL; Rolf B; Roman TS; Van Ziffle J; Guha S; Abhyankar A; Crosslin D; Venner E; Yuan B; Zouk H; ; Jarvik GP
    Am J Hum Genet; 2020 Nov; 107(5):932-941. PubMed ID: 33108757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. VIP-HL: Semi-automated ACMG/AMP variant interpretation platform for genetic hearing loss.
    Peng J; Xiang J; Jin X; Meng J; Song N; Chen L; Abou Tayoun A; Peng Z
    Hum Mutat; 2021 Dec; 42(12):1567-1575. PubMed ID: 34428318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. AutoGVP: a dockerized workflow integrating ClinVar and InterVar germline sequence variant classification.
    Kim J; Naqvi AS; Corbett RJ; Kaufman RS; Vaksman Z; Brown MA; Miller DP; Phul S; Geng Z; Storm PB; Resnick AC; Stewart DR; Rokita JL; Diskin SJ
    Bioinformatics; 2024 Mar; 40(3):. PubMed ID: 38426335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Modeling the ACMG/AMP variant classification guidelines as a Bayesian classification framework.
    Tavtigian SV; Greenblatt MS; Harrison SM; Nussbaum RL; Prabhu SA; Boucher KM; Biesecker LG;
    Genet Med; 2018 Sep; 20(9):1054-1060. PubMed ID: 29300386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The Frequency of Discordant Variant Classification in the Human Gene Mutation Database: A Comparison of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics Guidelines and ClinVar.
    Park KJ; Lee W; Chun S; Min WK
    Lab Med; 2021 May; 52(3):250-259. PubMed ID: 32926152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. ClinGen Variant Curation Expert Panel experiences and standardized processes for disease and gene-level specification of the ACMG/AMP guidelines for sequence variant interpretation.
    Rivera-Muñoz EA; Milko LV; Harrison SM; Azzariti DR; Kurtz CL; Lee K; Mester JL; Weaver MA; Currey E; Craigen W; Eng C; Funke B; Hegde M; Hershberger RE; Mao R; Steiner RD; Vincent LM; Martin CL; Plon SE; Ramos E; Rehm HL; Watson M; Berg JS
    Hum Mutat; 2018 Nov; 39(11):1614-1622. PubMed ID: 30311389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Clinical implications and considerations for evaluation of in silico algorithms for use with ACMG/AMP clinical variant interpretation guidelines.
    Bean LJH; Hegde MR
    Genome Med; 2017 Dec; 9(1):111. PubMed ID: 29254502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Performance of ACMG-AMP Variant-Interpretation Guidelines among Nine Laboratories in the Clinical Sequencing Exploratory Research Consortium.
    Amendola LM; Jarvik GP; Leo MC; McLaughlin HM; Akkari Y; Amaral MD; Berg JS; Biswas S; Bowling KM; Conlin LK; Cooper GM; Dorschner MO; Dulik MC; Ghazani AA; Ghosh R; Green RC; Hart R; Horton C; Johnston JJ; Lebo MS; Milosavljevic A; Ou J; Pak CM; Patel RY; Punj S; Richards CS; Salama J; Strande NT; Yang Y; Plon SE; Biesecker LG; Rehm HL
    Am J Hum Genet; 2016 Jun; 98(6):1067-1076. PubMed ID: 27181684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Adapting ACMG/AMP sequence variant classification guidelines for single-gene copy number variants.
    Brandt T; Sack LM; Arjona D; Tan D; Mei H; Cui H; Gao H; Bean LJH; Ankala A; Del Gaudio D; Knight Johnson A; Vincent LM; Reavey C; Lai A; Richard G; Meck JM
    Genet Med; 2020 Feb; 22(2):336-344. PubMed ID: 31534211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Clinical Interpretation of Sequence Variants.
    Zhang J; Yao Y; He H; Shen J
    Curr Protoc Hum Genet; 2020 Jun; 106(1):e98. PubMed ID: 32176464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. ClinGen's RASopathy Expert Panel consensus methods for variant interpretation.
    Gelb BD; Cavé H; Dillon MW; Gripp KW; Lee JA; Mason-Suares H; Rauen KA; Williams B; Zenker M; Vincent LM;
    Genet Med; 2018 Nov; 20(11):1334-1345. PubMed ID: 29493581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [The updates of the ACMG variant interpretation guidelines affect the pathogenicity determination of
    Wu KL; Li J; Wang HY; Wang QJ
    Zhonghua Er Bi Yan Hou Tou Jing Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2024 May; 59(5):455-463. PubMed ID: 38811176
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.