243 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3844110)
1. On the scene: University of Cincinnati Hospital. Confronting inadequate clinical performance.
Gallagher PH; Teehan MP
Nurs Adm Q; 1985; 9(2):49-54. PubMed ID: 3844110
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Performance appraisal of staff nurses - part III. Developing performance standards and an evaluation tool for staff nurses.
Bray KA
Crit Care Nurse; 1982; 2(5):36-44. PubMed ID: 6924871
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Nursing management in critical care units. Performance appraisal of staff nurses: Part I.
Bray KA
Crit Care Nurse; 1982; 2(2):7-13. PubMed ID: 6918283
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. On the scene: University of Cincinnati Hospital. Guidelines for confrontation.
Malone BL
Nurs Adm Q; 1985; 9(2):54-7. PubMed ID: 3844111
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. On the scene: University of Cincinnati Hospital. Nurses with chronic debilitating diseases.
Gallagher PH
Nurs Adm Q; 1985; 9(2):58-61. PubMed ID: 3844112
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Establishing a criterion-based performance appraisal for a department of nursing.
Megel MA
Nurs Clin North Am; 1983 Sep; 18(3):449-56. PubMed ID: 6554709
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Evaluating supplemental professional nurses.
Metzger NJ
Nurs Manage; 1990 Jan; 21(1):54-5, 58-9, 62. PubMed ID: 2294495
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. On the scene: University of Cincinnati Hospital. Employee assistance in nursing.
Robinson RS
Nurs Adm Q; 1985; 9(2):33-6. PubMed ID: 3844105
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Performance appraisal tests for staff nurses.
Cunningham CV
Nurs Times; 1981 May; 77(22):suppl 16: 61-3. PubMed ID: 6909815
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. On the scene: University of Cincinnati Hospital. The angry nurse/the angry staff.
Morath JM; Casey M; Covert E
Nurs Adm Q; 1985; 9(2):45-9. PubMed ID: 3844109
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Performance evaluation of staff nurses.
Goodykoontz L
Superv Nurse; 1981 Aug; 12(8):39-43. PubMed ID: 6910946
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. On the scene: University of Cincinnati Hospital. Legitimate anger: consequences and challenges.
Malone BL
Nurs Adm Q; 1985; 9(2):41-5. PubMed ID: 3844108
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Evaluating clinical competency in nursing.
Lunde KF; Durbin-Lafferty E
Nurs Manage; 1986 Aug; 17(8):47-50. PubMed ID: 3637728
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Evaluation of adherence to policy and procedures.
Kirchhoff KT; Sylwestrak ML; Chenelly S; McLane C
Nurs Manage; 1988 Jan; 19(1):51-4. PubMed ID: 3336525
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Evaluating float staff.
Bower KA
Nurs Manage; 1987 Dec; 18(12):62-3. PubMed ID: 3696621
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. A framework for assessing performance problems.
Meyer AL
J Nurs Adm; 1984 May; 14(5):40-3. PubMed ID: 6562171
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A criteria-based performance appraisal for the critical care nurse.
Burns C; Chubinski S; Freiburger O
Nurs Adm Q; 1983; 7(3):46-58. PubMed ID: 6574346
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. [Seminar on nursing administration: personnel rating].
Kong SK
Taehan Kanho; 1984 Dec; 23(5):28-39. PubMed ID: 6569267
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Staff appraisal. Starting from scratch.
Dimmock S
Nurs Times; 1985 Jul 24-30; 81(30):54-5. PubMed ID: 3848887
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. The performance profile: a technique for using appraisals effectively.
South JC
J Nurs Adm; 1978 Jan; 8(1):27-31. PubMed ID: 245382
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
