These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

193 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38441814)

  • 1. Cognitive ergonomics and robotic surgery.
    Wong SW; Crowe P
    J Robot Surg; 2024 Mar; 18(1):110. PubMed ID: 38441814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparative assessment of physical and cognitive ergonomics associated with robotic and traditional laparoscopic surgeries.
    Lee GI; Lee MR; Clanton T; Sutton E; Park AE; Marohn MR
    Surg Endosc; 2014 Feb; 28(2):456-65. PubMed ID: 24196542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Robotic colorectal surgery and ergonomics.
    Wong SW; Ang ZH; Yang PF; Crowe P
    J Robot Surg; 2022 Apr; 16(2):241-246. PubMed ID: 33886064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Bariatric Surgeon Ergonomics: A Comparison of Laparoscopy and Robotics.
    Hilt L; Sherman B; Tan WH; Lak K; Gould JC; Kindel TL; Higgins RM
    J Surg Res; 2024 Mar; 295():864-873. PubMed ID: 37968140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Impact of robotic assistance on mental workload and cognitive performance of surgical trainees performing a complex minimally invasive suturing task.
    Lau E; Alkhamesi NA; Schlachta CM
    Surg Endosc; 2020 Jun; 34(6):2551-2559. PubMed ID: 31482359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Virtual Reality
    Cowan A; Chen J; Mingo S; Reddy SS; Ma R; Marshall S; Nguyen JH; Hung AJ
    J Endourol; 2021 Oct; 35(10):1571-1576. PubMed ID: 34235970
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The Relationship Between Technical Skills, Cognitive Workload, and Errors During Robotic Surgical Exercises.
    Roberts SI; Cen SY; Nguyen JH; Perez LC; Medina LG; Ma R; Marshall S; Kocielnik R; Anandkumar A; Hung AJ
    J Endourol; 2022 May; 36(5):712-720. PubMed ID: 34913734
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Using objective robotic automated performance metrics and task-evoked pupillary response to distinguish surgeon expertise.
    Nguyen JH; Chen J; Marshall SP; Ghodoussipour S; Chen A; Gill IS; Hung AJ
    World J Urol; 2020 Jul; 38(7):1599-1605. PubMed ID: 31346762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Intraoperative workload in robotic surgery assessed by wearable motion tracking sensors and questionnaires.
    Yu D; Dural C; Morrow MM; Yang L; Collins JW; Hallbeck S; Kjellman M; Forsman M
    Surg Endosc; 2017 Feb; 31(2):877-886. PubMed ID: 27495330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. From dV-Trainer to Real Robotic Console: The Limitations of Robotic Skill Training.
    Yang K; Zhen H; Hubert N; Perez M; Wang XH; Hubert J
    J Surg Educ; 2017; 74(6):1074-1080. PubMed ID: 28462814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Can a virtual reality surgical simulation training provide a self-driven and mentor-free skills learning? Investigation of the practical influence of the performance metrics from the virtual reality robotic surgery simulator on the skill learning and associated cognitive workloads.
    Lee GI; Lee MR
    Surg Endosc; 2018 Jan; 32(1):62-72. PubMed ID: 28634632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Eye-Tracking Metrics Predict Perceived Workload in Robotic Surgical Skills Training.
    Wu C; Cha J; Sulek J; Zhou T; Sundaram CP; Wachs J; Yu D
    Hum Factors; 2020 Dec; 62(8):1365-1386. PubMed ID: 31560573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Ergonomic analysis of laparoscopic and robotic surgical task performance at various experience levels.
    Zárate Rodriguez JG; Zihni AM; Ohu I; Cavallo JA; Ray S; Cho S; Awad MM
    Surg Endosc; 2019 Jun; 33(6):1938-1943. PubMed ID: 30350099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Non-Technical Skill Assessment and Mental Load Evaluation in Robot-Assisted Minimally Invasive Surgery.
    Nagyné Elek R; Haidegger T
    Sensors (Basel); 2021 Apr; 21(8):. PubMed ID: 33920087
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A systematic review of the true benefit of robotic surgery: Ergonomics.
    Wee IJY; Kuo LJ; Ngu JC
    Int J Med Robot; 2020 Aug; 16(4):e2113. PubMed ID: 32304167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Robotic Handle Prototypes for Endoscopic Endonasal Skull Base Surgery: Pre-clinical Randomised Controlled Trial of Performance and Ergonomics.
    Dimitrakakis E; Aylmore H; Lindenroth L; Dwyer G; Carmichael J; Khan DZ; Dorward NL; Marcus HJ; Stoyanov D
    Ann Biomed Eng; 2022 May; 50(5):549-563. PubMed ID: 35258744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Initial experience using a robotic-driven laparoscopic needle holder with ergonomic handle: assessment of surgeons' task performance and ergonomics.
    Sánchez-Margallo JA; Sánchez-Margallo FM
    Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg; 2017 Dec; 12(12):2069-2077. PubMed ID: 28695479
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Visualisation ergonomics and robotic surgery.
    Wong SW; Crowe P
    J Robot Surg; 2023 Oct; 17(5):1873-1878. PubMed ID: 37204648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A comparison of laparoscopic and robotic ergonomic risk.
    Monfared S; Athanasiadis DI; Umana L; Hernandez E; Asadi H; Colgate CL; Yu D; Stefanidis D
    Surg Endosc; 2022 Nov; 36(11):8397-8402. PubMed ID: 35182219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Human factors in robotic assisted surgery: Lessons from studies 'in the Wild'.
    Catchpole K; Bisantz A; Hallbeck MS; Weigl M; Randell R; Kossack M; Anger JT
    Appl Ergon; 2019 Jul; 78():270-276. PubMed ID: 29478667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.