These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

320 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38441945)

  • 1. What's in a Name? Experimental Evidence of Gender Bias in Recommendation Letters Generated by ChatGPT.
    Kaplan DM; Palitsky R; Arconada Alvarez SJ; Pozzo NS; Greenleaf MN; Atkinson CA; Lam WA
    J Med Internet Res; 2024 Mar; 26():e51837. PubMed ID: 38441945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Gender Bias in Artificial Intelligence-Written Letters of Reference.
    Farlow JL; Abouyared M; Rettig EM; Kejner A; Patel R; Edwards HA
    Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2024 May; ():. PubMed ID: 38716794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Are There Gender-based Differences in Language in Letters of Recommendation to an Orthopaedic Surgery Residency Program?
    Kobayashi AN; Sterling RS; Tackett SA; Chee BW; Laporte DM; Humbyrd CJ
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2020 Jul; 478(7):1400-1408. PubMed ID: 31794493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Linguistic Differences by Gender in Letters of Recommendation for Maternal-Fetal Medicine Fellowship Applicants.
    Rosenthal E; Tappy E; Pan E; Verma D; Wang A; Brown LS; Santiago-Muñoz P; Florian-Rodriguez M
    Am J Perinatol; 2024 May; 41(S 01):e1955-e1961. PubMed ID: 37336234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Gender and Language in Letters of Recommendation for Obstetrics and Gynecology Fellowship Applications.
    Ellett T; Zanolli N; Weber JM; Erkanli A; Rosette AS; Dotters-Katz SK; Davidson B
    J Surg Educ; 2023 Oct; 80(10):1424-1431. PubMed ID: 37580240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Do gender and racial differences exist in letters of recommendation for obstetrics and gynecology residency applicants?
    Brown O; Mou T; Lim SI; Jones S; Sade S; Kwasny MJ; Mueller MG; Kenton K
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2021 Nov; 225(5):554.e1-554.e11. PubMed ID: 34506753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Gender and Racial Bias in Radiology Residency Letters of Recommendation.
    Grimm LJ; Redmond RA; Campbell JC; Rosette AS
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2020 Jan; 17(1 Pt A):64-71. PubMed ID: 31494103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Evaluating Language Characteristics and Related Gender Bias in Letters of Recommendation for Hand Surgery Fellowship.
    Kraenzlin F; Schaefer EJ; Hawken JB; Sanghavi KK; Chee BW; Giladi AM
    J Hand Surg Am; 2024 Aug; 49(8):801.e1-801.e8. PubMed ID: 36788050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Gender and Racial Bias in Letters of Recommendation for Orthopedic Surgery Residency Positions.
    Girgis MY; Qazi S; Patel A; Yu D; Lu X; Sewards J
    J Surg Educ; 2023 Jan; 80(1):127-134. PubMed ID: 36151044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Influence of Gender on Surgical Residency Applicants' Recommendation Letters.
    Turrentine FE; Dreisbach CN; St Ivany AR; Hanks JB; Schroen AT
    J Am Coll Surg; 2019 Apr; 228(4):356-365.e3. PubMed ID: 30630084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Gender and Letters of Recommendation: A Linguistic Comparison of the Impact of Gender on General Surgery Residency Applicants
    French JC; Zolin SJ; Lampert E; Aiello A; Bencsath KP; Ritter KA; Strong AT; Lipman JM; Valente MA; Prabhu AS
    J Surg Educ; 2019; 76(4):899-905. PubMed ID: 30598383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Linguistic Analysis of Letters of Recommendation for Vascular Surgery and Obstetrics and Gynecology Applicants Detects Differences in Attributable Strengths Based on Gender.
    Go C; Lang S; Byrne M; Brucha DL; Parviainen K; Sachdev U
    J Surg Educ; 2021; 78(5):1535-1543. PubMed ID: 33745859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Linguistic Differences by Gender in Letters of Recommendation for Female Pelvic Medicine and Reconstructive Surgery Fellowship Applicants From 2010 to 2020.
    Tappy E; Pan E; Brown LS; Wang A; Verma D; Florian-Rodriguez M
    Urogynecology (Phila); 2022 Oct; 28(10):705-712. PubMed ID: 35703286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Don't Judge a Letter by its Title: Linguistic Analysis of Letters of Recommendation by Author's Academic Rank.
    Han AY; French JC; Tu C; Obiri-Yeboah D; Lipman JM; Prabhu AS
    J Surg Educ; 2021; 78(6):e19-e27. PubMed ID: 34011478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Human vs machine: identifying ChatGPT-generated abstracts in Gynecology and Urogynecology.
    Pan ET; Florian-Rodriguez M
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2024 Aug; 231(2):276.e1-276.e10. PubMed ID: 38710267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16.
    Verharen JPH
    Elife; 2023 Nov; 12():. PubMed ID: 37922198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Can AI Mitigate Bias in Writing Letters of Recommendation?
    Leung TI; Sagar A; Shroff S; Henry TL
    JMIR Med Educ; 2023 Aug; 9():e51494. PubMed ID: 37610808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Gender-based differences in letters of recommendation written for ophthalmology residency applicants.
    Lin F; Oh SK; Gordon LK; Pineles SL; Rosenberg JB; Tsui I
    BMC Med Educ; 2019 Dec; 19(1):476. PubMed ID: 31888607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Differences in international medical graduates' letters of recommendation by gender in pulmonary and critical care medicine: a cohort analysis.
    Byrd KM; Jain S; Choudhuri I; Çoruh B; McSparron JI; Viglianti EM
    BMC Med Educ; 2023 Jan; 23(1):58. PubMed ID: 36694194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Use of artificial intelligence for gender bias analysis in letters of recommendation for general surgery residency candidates.
    Sarraf D; Vasiliu V; Imberman B; Lindeman B
    Am J Surg; 2021 Dec; 222(6):1051-1059. PubMed ID: 34674847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.