BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

78 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3844278)

  • 21. For nurses only: how to give a deposition.
    Bernthal DG
    Home Healthc Nurse; 1988; 6(3):37-8. PubMed ID: 3366611
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. When the burden of proof falls on you.
    Buley DD
    Nursing; 1986 Feb; 16(2):41. PubMed ID: 3633039
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Nurses' negligence explored by California court. Nichols v. Good Samaritan Hospital.
    Hosp Law Newsl; 2005 Sep; 22(11):5-6. PubMed ID: 16130833
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Patients' word v. nurse's word: documentation. Case in point: Sheppard v. Kimbrough (318 S.E. 2d - SC).
    Tammelleo AD
    Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1984 Nov; 25(6):4. PubMed ID: 6568727
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. [Falls of residents and patients: no liability for general frailty].
    Weber M
    Pflege Z; 2007 Aug; 60(8):450-2. PubMed ID: 17847999
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. You're being deposed? Remain calm.
    Martin K; Cepero K
    Nursing; 1999 Mar; 29(3):60-1. PubMed ID: 10205510
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Expert testimony fails: $9.5 million judgment reversed.
    Tammelleo AD
    Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1991 Oct; 32(5):1. PubMed ID: 1956983
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Expert witness testimony: the ethics of being a medical expert witness.
    Andrew LB
    Emerg Med Clin North Am; 2006 Aug; 24(3):715-31. PubMed ID: 16877139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. A mock trial approach: nursing competency program.
    Patrick S
    J Nurses Staff Dev; 2008; 24(4):194. PubMed ID: 18685484
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. De-mystifying the expert witness testimony experience.
    Conklin LA
    SCI Nurs; 2004; 21(2):96-8. PubMed ID: 15553081
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Malpractice: a question of judgement.
    Gutterman CL
    AUAA J; 1984; 5(1):3. PubMed ID: 6237636
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Coroner's decisions.
    RNABC News; 1988; 20(2):8. PubMed ID: 3358080
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Giving a deposition?
    Di Luigi KJ
    RN; 2004 Jan; 67(1):63-6, 68-9. PubMed ID: 14979195
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. The malpractice reform conundrum: does reducing frivolous claims simply lead to more pre-trial appeals?
    Berg RN
    J Med Assoc Ga; 1994 Aug; 83(8):477-9. PubMed ID: 7822975
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Nursing malpractice: cause for consideration.
    Fiesta J
    Nurs Manage; 1999 Feb; 30(2):12-3. PubMed ID: 10188505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Midwifery and malpractice.
    Perkins BB
    Midwifery Today Int Midwife; 2006; (79):22-3. PubMed ID: 17024893
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Law and the ED nurse: subpoenas.
    George JE
    J Emerg Nurs; 1984; 10(2):108. PubMed ID: 6368927
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Legal accountability through staff development.
    Hegge M
    J Nurs Staff Dev; 1985; 1():80-1. PubMed ID: 3851830
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. The Grange.
    Pipher J
    RNAO News; 1984; 40(2):5-6, 10, 13. PubMed ID: 6560783
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Expert testimony: a perspective from the trenches.
    Hawkins TS
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2005 Feb; 2(2):126-30. PubMed ID: 17411781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.