These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

120 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38443245)

  • 21. Effect of scan powder and scanning technology on measured deviations of complete-arch implant supported frameworks digitized with industrial and intraoral scanners.
    Donmez MB; Çakmak G; Dede DÖ; Küçükekenci AS; Lu WE; Schumacher FL; Revilla-León M; Yilmaz B
    J Dent; 2023 Nov; 138():104736. PubMed ID: 37802291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Effect of relative humidity on the accuracy, scanning time, and number of photograms of dentate complete arch intraoral digital scans.
    Agustín-Panadero R; Estada MIC; Alonso Pérez-Barquero J; Zubizarreta-Macho Á; Revilla-León M; Gómez-Polo M
    J Prosthet Dent; 2023 May; ():. PubMed ID: 37210222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Scanning accuracy with splinted and unsplinted implant scan bodies for the edentulous arch at implant level: an in vitro study.
    Garbacea A; Alqahtani AF; Goodacre B; Alhelal A; Lozada J; Kattadiyil MT
    J Oral Implantol; 2022 Jul; ():. PubMed ID: 35816623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Comparing the accuracy of full-arch implant impressions using the conventional technique and digital scans with and without prefabricated landmarks in the mandible: An in vitro study.
    Ke Y; Zhang Y; Wang Y; Chen H; Sun Y
    J Dent; 2023 Aug; 135():104561. PubMed ID: 37236297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Accuracy of maximum intercuspal position located by using four intraoral scanners and an artificial intelligence-based program.
    Revilla-León M; Fernández-Estevan L; Barmak AB; Kois JC; Alonso Pérez-Barquero J
    J Prosthet Dent; 2024 Apr; ():. PubMed ID: 38604907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Trueness and precision of complete-arch photogrammetry implant scanning assessed with a coordinate-measuring machine.
    Revilla-León M; Rubenstein J; Methani MM; Piedra-Cascón W; Özcan M; Att W
    J Prosthet Dent; 2023 Jan; 129(1):160-165. PubMed ID: 34154820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Influence of the dental arch and number of cutting-off and rescanning mesh holes on the accuracy of implant scans in partially edentulous situations.
    Gómez-Polo M; Immorlano MG; Cascos-Sánchez R; Ortega R; Barmak AB; Kois JC; Revilla-León M
    J Dent; 2023 Oct; 137():104667. PubMed ID: 37595865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Trueness and Precision of Three-Dimensional Digitizing Intraoral Devices.
    Mutwalli H; Braian M; Mahmood D; Larsson C
    Int J Dent; 2018; 2018():5189761. PubMed ID: 30598665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Effect of Scanner Type and Scan Body Location on the Accuracy of Mandibular Complete-Arch Digital Implant Scans: An In Vitro Study.
    Çakmak G; Yilmaz H; Treviño Santos A; Kökat AM; Yilmaz B
    J Prosthodont; 2022 Jun; 31(5):419-426. PubMed ID: 34453466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. The Influence of Laboratory Scanner versus Intra-Oral Scanner on Determining Axes and Distances between Three Implants in a Straight Line by Using Two Different Intraoral Scan Bodies: A Pilot In Vitro Study.
    Shely A; Lugassy D; Rosner O; Zanziper E; Nissan J; Rachmiel S; Khoury Y; Ben-Izhack G
    J Clin Med; 2023 Oct; 12(20):. PubMed ID: 37892783
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. [Accuracy of photogrammetry and conventional impression techniques for complete-arch implant rehabilitation: an
    Sun YJ; Ma BW; Yue XX; Lin X; Geng W
    Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2022 Feb; 57(2):168-172. PubMed ID: 35152653
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Accuracy of photogrammetry, intraoral scanning, and conventional impression techniques for complete-arch implant rehabilitation: an in vitro comparative study.
    Ma B; Yue X; Sun Y; Peng L; Geng W
    BMC Oral Health; 2021 Dec; 21(1):636. PubMed ID: 34893053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Influence of the surface humidity, implant angulation, and interimplant distance on the accuracy and scanning time of complete-arch implant scans.
    Gómez-Polo M; Ortega R; Sallorenzo A; Agustín-Panadero R; Barmak AB; Kois JC; Revilla-León M
    J Dent; 2022 Dec; 127():104307. PubMed ID: 36162637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. The effect of different tooth preparation finishing procedures and immediate dentin sealing on the scanning accuracy of different intraoral scanners.
    Revilla-León M; Cascos-Sánchez R; Barmak AB; Kois JC; Gómez-Polo M
    J Dent; 2023 Mar; 130():104431. PubMed ID: 36682722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Scan accuracy of wireless intraoral scanners while digitizing a combined scan body-healing abutment system: Scan accuracy of wireless scanners.
    Dinçer G; Molinero-Mourelle P; Donmez MB; Kahveci Ç; Yilmaz B; Çakmak G
    J Dent; 2024 Oct; ():105413. PubMed ID: 39419370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Accuracy of complete-arch intraoral scans based on confocal microscopy versus optical triangulation: A comparative in vitro study.
    Waldecker M; Rues S; Rammelsberg P; Bömicke W
    J Prosthet Dent; 2021 Sep; 126(3):414-420. PubMed ID: 32950254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Accuracy of an artificial intelligence-based program for locating the maxillomandibular relationship of scans acquired by using intraoral scanners.
    Revilla-León M; Gómez-Polo M; Barmak AB; Kois JC; Alonso Pérez-Barquero J
    J Prosthet Dent; 2024 Mar; ():. PubMed ID: 38458860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Accuracy of six intraoral scanners for scanning complete-arch and 4-unit fixed partial dentures: An in vitro study.
    Diker B; Tak Ö
    J Prosthet Dent; 2022 Aug; 128(2):187-194. PubMed ID: 33558056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Accuracy of different digital scanning techniques and scan bodies for complete-arch implant-supported prostheses.
    Mizumoto RM; Yilmaz B; McGlumphy EA; Seidt J; Johnston WM
    J Prosthet Dent; 2020 Jan; 123(1):96-104. PubMed ID: 31040026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Influence of interdental spaces and the palate on the accuracy of maxillary scans acquired using different intraoral scanners.
    Akl MA; Daifallah K; Pérez-Barquero JA; Barmak AB; Wee AG; Revilla-León M
    J Prosthodont; 2023 Dec; 32(S2):125-134. PubMed ID: 37591814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.