These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

133 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38443383)

  • 1. Adaptive estimation of the Gutenberg-Richter b value using a state space model and particle filtering.
    Iwata D; Nanjo KZ
    Sci Rep; 2024 Mar; 14(1):4630. PubMed ID: 38443383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Revealing the spatiotemporal complexity of the magnitude distribution and b-value during an earthquake sequence.
    Herrmann M; Piegari E; Marzocchi W
    Nat Commun; 2022 Aug; 13(1):5087. PubMed ID: 36038553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Temporal Variation and Statistical Assessment of the
    Xie W; Hattori K; Han P
    Entropy (Basel); 2019 Mar; 21(3):. PubMed ID: 33266964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Temporal Variation of b Value with Statistical Test in Wenchuan Area, China Prior to the 2008 Wenchuan Earthquake.
    Xie W; Hattori K; Han P; Shi H
    Entropy (Basel); 2022 Mar; 24(4):. PubMed ID: 35455157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A probabilistic neural network for earthquake magnitude prediction.
    Adeli H; Panakkat A
    Neural Netw; 2009 Sep; 22(7):1018-24. PubMed ID: 19502005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Spatial mapping of b-value and fractal dimension prior to November 8, 2022 Doti Earthquake, Nepal.
    Tiwari RK; Paudyal H
    PLoS One; 2023; 18(8):e0289673. PubMed ID: 37556467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Self-Optimized Computational Method Calculating Robust b Values for Earthquake Catalogs Containing Small Number of Events.
    Arvanitakis K; Kalamatianos R; Avlonitis M
    Adv Exp Med Biol; 2017; 988():291-299. PubMed ID: 28971408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Time window to constrain the corner value of the global seismic-moment distribution.
    Corral Á; Serra I
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(8):e0220237. PubMed ID: 31425542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Short-term forecasting of Taiwanese earthquakes using a universal model of fusion-fission processes.
    Cheong SA; Tan TL; Chen CC; Chang WL; Liu Z; Chew LY; Sloot PM; Johnson NF
    Sci Rep; 2014 Jan; 4():3624. PubMed ID: 24406467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Universality of power-law exponents by means of maximum-likelihood estimation.
    Navas-Portella V; González Á; Serra I; Vives E; Corral Á
    Phys Rev E; 2019 Dec; 100(6-1):062106. PubMed ID: 31962489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Nonlinear Statistical Features of the Seismicity in the Subduction Zone of Tehuantepec Isthmus, Southern México.
    Ramírez-Rojas A; Flores-Márquez EL
    Entropy (Basel); 2022 Mar; 24(4):. PubMed ID: 35455143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Interoccurrence time statistics in the two-dimensional Burridge-Knopoff earthquake model.
    Hasumi T
    Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys; 2007 Aug; 76(2 Pt 2):026117. PubMed ID: 17930114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Forecasting the magnitude of the largest expected earthquake.
    Shcherbakov R; Zhuang J; Zöller G; Ogata Y
    Nat Commun; 2019 Sep; 10(1):4051. PubMed ID: 31492839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Statistical physics models for aftershocks and induced seismicity.
    Luginbuhl M; Rundle JB; Turcotte DL
    Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci; 2018 Nov; 377(2136):. PubMed ID: 30478209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Multiplicative cascades and seismicity in natural time.
    Sarlis NV; Skordas ES; Varotsos PA
    Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys; 2009 Aug; 80(2 Pt 1):022102. PubMed ID: 19792180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Predicting the Maximum Earthquake Magnitude from Seismic Data in Israel and Its Neighboring Countries.
    Last M; Rabinowitz N; Leonard G
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(1):e0146101. PubMed ID: 26812351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Forest-fire analogy to explain the b value of the Gutenberg-Richter law for earthquakes.
    Jagla EA
    Phys Rev Lett; 2013 Dec; 111(23):238501. PubMed ID: 24476309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Evaluation of 0 ≤
    Adagunodo TA; Lüning S; Adeleke AM; Omidiora JO; Aizebeokhai AP; Oyeyemi KD; Hammed OS
    Data Brief; 2018 Apr; 17():588-603. PubMed ID: 29552608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Anomalous power law distribution of total lifetimes of branching processes: application to earthquake aftershock sequences.
    Saichev A; Sornette D
    Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys; 2004 Oct; 70(4 Pt 2):046123. PubMed ID: 15600476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Modeling Exact Frequency-Energy Distribution for Quakes by a Probabilistic Cellular Automaton.
    Białecki M; Gałka M; Bagchi A; Gulgowski J
    Entropy (Basel); 2023 May; 25(5):. PubMed ID: 37238574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.