366 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38443499)
21. Comparing the Efficacy of Large Language Models ChatGPT, BARD, and Bing AI in Providing Information on Rhinoplasty: An Observational Study.
Seth I; Lim B; Xie Y; Cevik J; Rozen WM; Ross RJ; Lee M
Aesthet Surg J Open Forum; 2023; 5():ojad084. PubMed ID: 37795257
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Can Artificial Intelligence Improve the Readability of Patient Education Materials?
Kirchner GJ; Kim RY; Weddle JB; Bible JE
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2023 Nov; 481(11):2260-2267. PubMed ID: 37116006
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. The Performance of Chatbots and the AAPOS Website as a Tool for Amblyopia Education.
Doğan L; Özçakmakcı GB; Yılmaz ĬE
J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus; 2024 Apr; ():1-7. PubMed ID: 38661309
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. ChatGPT vs. web search for patient questions: what does ChatGPT do better?
Shen SA; Perez-Heydrich CA; Xie DX; Nellis JC
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2024 Jun; 281(6):3219-3225. PubMed ID: 38416195
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Talking technology: exploring chatbots as a tool for cataract patient education.
Yılmaz IBE; Doğan L
Clin Exp Optom; 2024 Jan; ():1-9. PubMed ID: 38194585
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Evaluating the accuracy and readability of ChatGPT in providing parental guidance for adenoidectomy, tonsillectomy, and ventilation tube insertion surgery.
Polat E; Polat YB; Senturk E; Dogan R; Yenigun A; Tugrul S; Eren SB; Aksoy F; Ozturan O
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2024 Jun; 181():111998. PubMed ID: 38830271
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. THE ABILITY OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE CHATBOTS ChatGPT AND GOOGLE BARD TO ACCURATELY CONVEY PREOPERATIVE INFORMATION FOR PATIENTS UNDERGOING OPHTHALMIC SURGERIES.
Patil NS; Huang R; Mihalache A; Kisilevsky E; Kwok J; Popovic MM; Nassrallah G; Chan C; Mallipatna A; Kertes PJ; Muni RH
Retina; 2024 Jun; 44(6):950-953. PubMed ID: 38215455
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Both Patients and Plastic Surgeons Prefer Artificial Intelligence-Generated Microsurgical Information.
Berry CE; Fazilat AZ; Lavin C; Lintel H; Cole N; Stingl CS; Valencia C; Morgan AG; Momeni A; Wan DC
J Reconstr Microsurg; 2024 Mar; ():. PubMed ID: 38382637
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Assessment of Artificial Intelligence Chatbot Responses to Top Searched Queries About Cancer.
Pan A; Musheyev D; Bockelman D; Loeb S; Kabarriti AE
JAMA Oncol; 2023 Oct; 9(10):1437-1440. PubMed ID: 37615960
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Responses of Five Different Artificial Intelligence Chatbots to the Top Searched Queries About Erectile Dysfunction: A Comparative Analysis.
Şahin MF; Ateş H; Keleş A; Özcan R; Doğan Ç; Akgül M; Yazıcı CM
J Med Syst; 2024 Apr; 48(1):38. PubMed ID: 38568432
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Information Quality and Readability: ChatGPT's Responses to the Most Common Questions About Spinal Cord Injury.
Temel MH; Erden Y; Bağcıer F
World Neurosurg; 2024 Jan; 181():e1138-e1144. PubMed ID: 38000671
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Artificial intelligence insights into osteoporosis: assessing ChatGPT's information quality and readability.
Erden Y; Temel MH; Bağcıer F
Arch Osteoporos; 2024 Mar; 19(1):17. PubMed ID: 38499716
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Assessment of Quality and Readability of Information Provided by ChatGPT in Relation to Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injury.
Fahy S; Oehme S; Milinkovic D; Jung T; Bartek B
J Pers Med; 2024 Jan; 14(1):. PubMed ID: 38248805
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. The quality and readability of patient information provided by ChatGPT: can AI reliably explain common ENT operations?
Abou-Abdallah M; Dar T; Mahmudzade Y; Michaels J; Talwar R; Tornari C
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2024 Mar; ():. PubMed ID: 38530460
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Evaluating the quality and readability of Internet information sources regarding the treatment of swallowing disorders.
O'Connell Ferster AP; Hu A
Ear Nose Throat J; 2017 Mar; 96(3):128-138. PubMed ID: 28346643
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Quantitative Comparison of Chatbots on Common Rhinology Pathologies.
Bellinger JR; Kwak MW; Ramos GA; Mella JS; Mattos JL
Laryngoscope; 2024 Apr; ():. PubMed ID: 38666768
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Evaluation of the reliability and readability of ChatGPT-4 responses regarding hypothyroidism during pregnancy.
Onder CE; Koc G; Gokbulut P; Taskaldiran I; Kuskonmaz SM
Sci Rep; 2024 Jan; 14(1):243. PubMed ID: 38167988
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Evaluation of information accuracy and clarity: ChatGPT responses to the most frequently asked questions about premature ejaculation.
Şahin MF; Keleş A; Özcan R; Doğan Ç; Topkaç EC; Akgül M; Yazıci CM
Sex Med; 2024 Jun; 12(3):qfae036. PubMed ID: 38832125
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Evaluation High-Quality of Information from ChatGPT (Artificial Intelligence-Large Language Model) Artificial Intelligence on Shoulder Stabilization Surgery.
Hurley ET; Crook BS; Lorentz SG; Danilkowicz RM; Lau BC; Taylor DC; Dickens JF; Anakwenze O; Klifto CS
Arthroscopy; 2024 Mar; 40(3):726-731.e6. PubMed ID: 37567487
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Assessing the accuracy, usefulness, and readability of artificial-intelligence-generated responses to common dermatologic surgery questions for patient education: A double-blinded comparative study of ChatGPT and Google Bard.
Robinson MA; Belzberg M; Thakker S; Bibee K; Merkel E; MacFarlane DF; Lim J; Scott JF; Deng M; Lewin J; Soleymani D; Rosenfeld D; Liu R; Liu TYA; Ng E
J Am Acad Dermatol; 2024 May; 90(5):1078-1080. PubMed ID: 38296195
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
