111 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38443531)
1. Membrane processes used to treat scrubber gas desulfuration washwater.
Drouin M; Nasser S; Moulin P
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2024 Mar; ():. PubMed ID: 38443531
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Membrane Separation Used as Treatment of Alkaline Wastewater from a Maritime Scrubber Unit.
Drouin M; Parravicini G; Nasser S; Moulin P
Membranes (Basel); 2022 Oct; 12(10):. PubMed ID: 36295727
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Effects of seawater scrubbing on a microplanktonic community during a summer-bloom in the Baltic Sea.
Ytreberg E; Karlberg M; Hassellöv IM; Hedblom M; Nylund AT; Salo K; Imberg H; Turner D; Tripp L; Yong J; Wulff A
Environ Pollut; 2021 Dec; 291():118251. PubMed ID: 34592329
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Environmental policy constraints for acidic exhaust gas scrubber discharges from ships.
Ülpre H; Eames I
Mar Pollut Bull; 2014 Nov; 88(1-2):292-301. PubMed ID: 25284442
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Simulation investigation on marine exhaust gas SO
Li W; Zhang Y; Zhao Z; Liu C; Wang Y; Shen M; Dai H; Yang Y; Zheng C; Gao X
J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2022 May; 72(5):383-402. PubMed ID: 34874231
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Aerosol emissions from a marine diesel engine running on different fuels and effects of exhaust gas cleaning measures.
Jeong S; Bendl J; Saraji-Bozorgzad M; Käfer U; Etzien U; Schade J; Bauer M; Jakobi G; Orasche J; Fisch K; Cwierz PP; Rüger CP; Czech H; Karg E; Heyen G; Krausnick M; Geissler A; Geipel C; Streibel T; Schnelle-Kreis J; Sklorz M; Schulz-Bull DE; Buchholz B; Adam T; Zimmermann R
Environ Pollut; 2023 Jan; 316(Pt 1):120526. PubMed ID: 36341831
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Toxic effects of ship exhaust gas closed-loop scrubber wash water.
Ji Z; Yang Y; Zhu Y; Ling Y; Ren D; Zhang N; Huo Z
Toxicol Ind Health; 2023 Sep; 39(9):491-503. PubMed ID: 37420335
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. An environmental and economic analysis of emission reduction strategies for container ships with emphasis on the improved energy efficiency indexes.
Ammar NR; Seddiek IS
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2020 Jun; 27(18):23342-23355. PubMed ID: 32338322
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Real-world particle emissions and secondary aerosol formation from a diesel oxidation catalyst and scrubber equipped ship operating with two fuels in a SECA area.
Karjalainen P; Teinilä K; Kuittinen N; Aakko-Saksa P; Bloss M; Vesala H; Pettinen R; Saarikoski S; Jalkanen JP; Timonen H
Environ Pollut; 2022 Jan; 292(Pt A):118278. PubMed ID: 34634405
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Erratum: Eyestalk Ablation to Increase Ovarian Maturation in Mud Crabs.
J Vis Exp; 2023 May; (195):. PubMed ID: 37235796
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Non-controlled biogenic emissions to the atmosphere from Lazareto landfill, Tenerife, Canary Islands.
Nolasco D; Lima RN; Hernández PA; Pérez NM
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2008 Jan; 15(1):51-60. PubMed ID: 18306888
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Effects of scrubber washwater discharge on microplankton in the Baltic Sea.
Ytreberg E; Hassellöv IM; Nylund AT; Hedblom M; Al-Handal AY; Wulff A
Mar Pollut Bull; 2019 Aug; 145():316-324. PubMed ID: 31590793
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Impacts of exhaust gas cleaning systems (EGCS) discharge waters on planktonic biological indicators.
Picone M; Russo M; Distefano GG; Baccichet M; Marchetto D; Volpi Ghirardini A; Lunde Hermansson A; Petrovic M; Gros M; Garcia E; Giubilato E; Calgaro L; Magnusson K; Granberg M; Marcomini A
Mar Pollut Bull; 2023 May; 190():114846. PubMed ID: 36965268
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Container fleet renewal considering multiple sulfur reduction technologies and uncertain markets amidst COVID-19.
Zhao Y; Ye J; Zhou J
J Clean Prod; 2021 Oct; 317():128361. PubMed ID: 34511741
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. From maritime salvage to IMO 2020 strategy: Two actions to protect the environment.
Sáez Álvarez P
Mar Pollut Bull; 2021 Sep; 170():112590. PubMed ID: 34171628
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Assessment of an Anaerobic Membrane Bioreactor (AnMBR) Treating Medium-Strength Synthetic Wastewater under Cyclical Membrane Operation.
Uman AE; Bair RA; Yeh DH
Membranes (Basel); 2021 May; 11(6):. PubMed ID: 34072658
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Ship Compliance in Emission Control Areas: Technology Costs and Policy Instruments.
Carr EW; Corbett JJ
Environ Sci Technol; 2015 Aug; 49(16):9584-91. PubMed ID: 26258438
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Characterization of scrubber water discharges from ships using comprehensive suspect screening strategies based on GC-APCI-HRMS.
García-Gómez E; Gkotsis G; Nika MC; Hassellöv IM; Salo K; Hermansson AL; Ytreberg E; Thomaidis NS; Gros M; Petrović M
Chemosphere; 2023 Dec; 343():140296. PubMed ID: 37769908
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Progress of ship exhaust gas control technology.
Zhao J; Wei Q; Wang S; Ren X
Sci Total Environ; 2021 Dec; 799():149437. PubMed ID: 34375870
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Combination of Zinc Oxide Photocatalysis with Membrane Filtration for Surface Water Disinfection.
Sosa SM; Huertas R; Pereira VJ
Membranes (Basel); 2023 Jan; 13(1):. PubMed ID: 36676863
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
