137 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38445503)
1. Comparison of safety and efficacy of different positions in percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a network meta-analysis.
Li P; Ma Y; Liao B; Jin X; Xiang L; Li H; Wang K
Int J Surg; 2024 Apr; 110(4):2411-2420. PubMed ID: 38445503
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Supine Versus Prone Position in Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy for Kidney Calculi: A Meta-Analysis.
Yuan D; Liu Y; Rao H; Cheng T; Sun Z; Wang Y; Liu J; Chen W; Zhong W; Zhu J
J Endourol; 2016 Jul; 30(7):754-63. PubMed ID: 27072075
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Flank versus prone position in percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled studies.
Zheng C; Yang H; Lv Y; Yang L
Urolithiasis; 2024 Apr; 52(1):70. PubMed ID: 38662047
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy vs standard PCNL for management of renal stones in the flank-free modified supine position: single-center experience.
Sakr A; Salem E; Kamel M; Desoky E; Ragab A; Omran M; Fawzi A; Shahin A
Urolithiasis; 2017 Dec; 45(6):585-589. PubMed ID: 28229197
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Supine versus prone position for percutaneous nephrolithotripsy: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
Li J; Gao L; Li Q; Zhang Y; Jiang Q
Int J Surg; 2019 Jun; 66():62-71. PubMed ID: 31034987
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Modified supine versus prone percutaneous nephrolithotomy: Surgical outcomes from a tertiary teaching hospital.
Jones MN; Ranasinghe W; Cetti R; Newell B; Chu K; Harper M; Kourambas J; McCahy P
Investig Clin Urol; 2016 Jul; 57(4):268-73. PubMed ID: 27437536
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of supine-prone percutaneous nephrolithotomy methods in the treatment of kidney stones in pediatric patients: prospective randomized study.
Eryılmaz R; Ertas K; Aslan R; Sevim M; Keles MF; Taken K
Urolithiasis; 2024 May; 52(1):73. PubMed ID: 38693402
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. One-Shot Dilatation
Mohyelden K; Abdel-Rassoul M; Dogha M; Kadry A; Mostafa A
J Endourol; 2022 Jun; 36(6):727-733. PubMed ID: 34969263
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison Between Supine Position Versus Prone Position In Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy: A Single Centered Analysis Of 623 Cases.
Jamil MN; Haq FU; Islam EU; Shaheen R; Farooq U
J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad; 2022; 34(Suppl 1)(4):S1003-S1007. PubMed ID: 36550663
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Complete Ultrasound-guided Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy in Prone and Supine Positions: A Randomized Controlled Study.
El-Shaer W; Kandeel W; Abdel-Lateef S; Torky A; Elshaer A
Urology; 2019 Jun; 128():31-37. PubMed ID: 30902696
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Application of a new position in endoscopic combined intrarenal surgery: modified prone split-leg position.
Wang D; Sun H; Xie D; Liu Z; Yu D; Ding D
BMC Urol; 2022 Mar; 22(1):38. PubMed ID: 35305626
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Is the supine position superior to the prone position for percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL)?
Zhang X; Xia L; Xu T; Wang X; Zhong S; Shen Z
Urolithiasis; 2014 Feb; 42(1):87-93. PubMed ID: 24141694
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Supine versus prone position in percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Birowo P; Tendi W; Widyahening IS; Rasyid N; Atmoko W
F1000Res; 2020; 9():231. PubMed ID: 33014345
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Percutaneous nephrolithotomy in the oblique supine lithotomy position and prone position: a comparative study.
Al-Dessoukey AA; Moussa AS; Abdelbary AM; Zayed A; Abdallah R; Elderwy AA; Massoud AM; Aly AH
J Endourol; 2014 Sep; 28(9):1058-63. PubMed ID: 24856575
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Endoscopic guided PCNL in the prone split-leg position versus supine PCNL: a comparative analysis stratified by Guy's stone score.
Batagello CA; Barone Dos Santos HD; Nguyen AH; Alshara L; Li J; Marchini GS; Vicentini FC; Torricelli FCM; Danilovic A; Pereira JG; Rose E; Srougi M; Nahas WC; Mazzucchi E; Monga M
Can J Urol; 2019 Feb; 26(1):9664-9674. PubMed ID: 30797250
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of the efficacy and safety of shockwave lithotripsy, retrograde intrarenal surgery, percutaneous nephrolithotomy, and minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy for lower-pole renal stones: A systematic review and network meta-analysis.
Tsai SH; Chung HJ; Tseng PT; Wu YC; Tu YK; Hsu CW; Lei WT
Medicine (Baltimore); 2020 Mar; 99(10):e19403. PubMed ID: 32150088
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Prone versus Barts “flank-free” modified supine percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a match-pair analysis.
Miçooğulları U; Kamacı D; Yıldızhan M; Umut Kılıç F; Çetin T; Çakıcı ÖU; Keske M; Yiğit Yalçın M; Ardıçoğlu A
Turk J Med Sci; 2021 Jun; 51(3):1373-1379. PubMed ID: 33550764
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison outcomes of percutaneous nephrolithotomy in prone and flank position in obese patients: A randomized clinical trial.
Hosseini SR; Fatahi B; Fakhr Yasseri AM
Urologia; 2022 Nov; 89(4):580-584. PubMed ID: 34396868
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Supine versus Prone Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy for Complex Stones: A Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial.
Perrella R; Vicentini FC; Paro ED; Torricelli FCM; Marchini GS; Danilovic A; Batagello CA; Mota PKV; Ferreira DB; Cohen DJ; Murta CB; Claro JFA; Giusti G; Monga M; Nahas WC; Srougi M; Mazzucchi E
J Urol; 2022 Mar; 207(3):647-656. PubMed ID: 34694154
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Intraoperative and postoperative feasibility and safety of total tubeless, tubeless, small-bore tube, and standard percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a systematic review and network meta-analysis of 16 randomized controlled trials.
Lee JY; Jeh SU; Kim MD; Kang DH; Kwon JK; Ham WS; Choi YD; Cho KS
BMC Urol; 2017 Jun; 17(1):48. PubMed ID: 28655317
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
