These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

115 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38446106)

  • 1. Returning Clinically Relevant Research Results to Participants: Guidelines for Investigators and the IRB.
    Waltz A; Johnson B; Schwartz PH
    Ethics Hum Res; 2024; 46(2):22-29. PubMed ID: 38446106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. American Society of Clinical Oncology policy statement: oversight of clinical research.
    American Society of Clinical Oncology
    J Clin Oncol; 2003 Jun; 21(12):2377-86. PubMed ID: 12721281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Informed consent for research on stored blood and tissue samples: a survey of institutional review board practices.
    White MT; Gamm J
    Account Res; 2002; 9(1):1-16. PubMed ID: 12705242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Evaluation of a University's Institutional Review Board Based on Campus Feedback: A Cross-Sectional Study.
    Rajab MH; Alkawi MZ; Gazal AM; Alshehri FA; Shaibah HS; Holmes LD
    Cureus; 2019 Oct; 11(10):e5829. PubMed ID: 31754564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. IRB perspectives on the return of individual results from genomic research.
    Dressler LG; Smolek S; Ponsaran R; Markey JM; Starks H; Gerson N; Lewis S; Press N; Juengst E; Wiesner GL;
    Genet Med; 2012 Feb; 14(2):215-22. PubMed ID: 22241094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Exception from informed consent: viewpoint of institutional review boards--balancing risks to subjects, community consultation, and future directions.
    Ernst AA; Fish S
    Acad Emerg Med; 2005 Nov; 12(11):1050-5. PubMed ID: 16264073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Analysis of the Nature of IRB Contingencies Required for Informed Consent Document Approval.
    Blackwood RA; Maio RF; Mrdjenovich AJ; VandenBosch TM; Gordon PS; Shipman EL; Hamilton TA
    Account Res; 2015; 22(4):237-45. PubMed ID: 25897768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. How US institutional review boards decide when researchers need to translate studies.
    Klitzman R
    J Med Ethics; 2014 Mar; 40(3):193-7. PubMed ID: 23475805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Awareness of Jordanian Investigators About the Importance of Ethics Review Committees: A Pilot Study.
    Rababa'h AM; Alzoubi KH; Ababneh M; Khabour OF
    Sci Eng Ethics; 2020 Apr; 26(2):821-831. PubMed ID: 31571048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Understanding institutional review boards: practical guidance to the IRB review process.
    Pech C; Cob N; Cejka JT
    Nutr Clin Pract; 2007 Dec; 22(6):618-28. PubMed ID: 18042949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Attitudes toward genetic research review: results from a survey of human genetics researchers.
    Edwards KL; Lemke AA; Trinidad SB; Lewis SM; Starks H; Quinn Griffin MT; Wiesner GL
    Public Health Genomics; 2011; 14(6):337-45. PubMed ID: 21487211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The Impact of Institutional Review Boards (IRBs) on Clinical Innovation: A Survey of Investigators and IRB Members.
    Stryjewski TP; Kalish BT; Silverman B; Lehmann LS
    J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics; 2015 Dec; 10(5):481-7. PubMed ID: 26564945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Implementation of Common Rule Changes to the Informed Consent Form: A Research Staff and Institutional Review Board Collaboration.
    Gartel G; Scuderi H; Servay C
    Ochsner J; 2020; 20(1):76-80. PubMed ID: 32284686
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Perspectives of Singaporean biomedical researchers and research support staff on actual and ideal IRB review functions and characteristics: A quantitative analysis.
    Labude MK; Shen L; Zhu Y; Schaefer GO; Ong C; Xafis V
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(12):e0241783. PubMed ID: 33382683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A qualitative study of institutional review board members' experience reviewing research proposals using emergency exception from informed consent.
    McClure KB; Delorio NM; Schmidt TA; Chiodo G; Gorman P
    J Med Ethics; 2007 May; 33(5):289-93. PubMed ID: 17470507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Impact of institutional review boards on cancer research.
    Kennedy BJ
    J Bioeth; 1984; 5(1):27-32. PubMed ID: 10271128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Is your ethics committee efficient? Using "IRB Metrics" as a self-assessment tool for continuous improvement at the Faculty of Tropical Medicine, Mahidol University, Thailand.
    Adams P; Kaewkungwal J; Limphattharacharoen C; Prakobtham S; Pengsaa K; Khusmith S
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(11):e113356. PubMed ID: 25406085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Operational Characteristics of Institutional Review Boards (IRBs) in the United States.
    Nesom GL; Petrof I; Moore TM
    AJOB Empir Bioeth; 2019; 10(4):276-286. PubMed ID: 31618119
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Assessing the Quality and Performance of Institutional Review Boards: Impact of the Revised Common Rule.
    Tsan MF; Van Hook H
    J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics; 2022 Oct; 17(4):525-532. PubMed ID: 35470732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. "Dogs on Call": A Community-Engaged Human Subjects Training with Hospital Based Therapy Dog Teams.
    Townsend L; Towsley N; Gee NR
    J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics; 2023 Dec; 18(5):363-371. PubMed ID: 37661667
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.