These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

115 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38446106)

  • 21. Impact of institutional review board practice variation on observational health services research.
    Green LA; Lowery JC; Kowalski CP; Wyszewianski L
    Health Serv Res; 2006 Feb; 41(1):214-30. PubMed ID: 16430608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. IRB Policies for Obtaining Informed Consent from Non-English-Speaking People.
    McMillan G
    Ethics Hum Res; 2020 May; 42(3):21-29. PubMed ID: 32421949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Assessing Institutional Ethics Committees in India Using the IRB-RAT.
    Chenneville T; Menezes L; Bylsma LM; Mann A; Kosambiya J; Baxi R
    J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics; 2014 Oct; 9(4):50-9. PubMed ID: 25747296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. The protectors and the protected: what regulators and researchers can learn from IRB members and subjects.
    Cook AF; Hoas H; Joyner JC
    Narrat Inq Bioeth; 2013; 3(1):51-65. PubMed ID: 24407005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Ethical issues of informed consent in malaria research proposals submitted to a research ethics committee in Thailand: a retrospective document review.
    Adams P; Prakobtham S; Limpattaracharoen C; Suebtrakul S; Vutikes P; Khusmith S; Wilairatana P; Adams P; Kaewkungwal J
    BMC Med Ethics; 2017 Aug; 18(1):50. PubMed ID: 28807022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Clinical Research in Vulnerable Populations: Variability and Focus of Institutional Review Boards' Responses.
    Kästner B; Behre S; Lutz N; Bürger F; Luntz S; Hinderhofer K; Bendszus M; Hoffmann GF; Ries M
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(8):e0135997. PubMed ID: 26275228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Practice-based research network studies and institutional review boards: two new issues.
    Yawn BP; Graham DG; Bertram SL; Kurland MJ; Dietrich AJ; Wollan PC; Brandt EC; Huff JM; Pace WD
    J Am Board Fam Med; 2009; 22(4):453-60. PubMed ID: 19587261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Research involving human subjects.
    Gray BH; Cooke RA; Tannenbaum AS
    Science; 1978 Sep; 201(4361):1094-101. PubMed ID: 356268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Consent form readability in university-sponsored research.
    Goldstein AO; Frasier P; Curtis P; Reid A; Kreher NE
    J Fam Pract; 1996 Jun; 42(6):606-11. PubMed ID: 8656172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Institutional review board guidance on pediatric research: missed opportunities.
    Wolf LE; Zandecki J; Lo B
    J Pediatr; 2005 Jul; 147(1):84-9. PubMed ID: 16027701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. The Practice of Research Ethics in Lebanon and Qatar: Perspectives of Researchers on Informed Consent.
    Nakkash R; Qutteina Y; Nasrallah C; Wright K; El-Alti L; Makhoul J; Al-Ali K
    J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics; 2017 Dec; 12(5):352-362. PubMed ID: 28905673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. The investigator and the IRB: a survey of depression and schizophrenia researchers.
    Fischer BA; George P
    Schizophr Res; 2010 Sep; 122(1-3):206-12. PubMed ID: 20064703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Research consent by adolescent minors and institutional review boards.
    Mammel KA; Kaplan DW
    J Adolesc Health; 1995 Nov; 17(5):323-30. PubMed ID: 8924437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Perspectives of IRB chairs on the informed consent process.
    Kane EI; Gallo JJ
    AJOB Empir Bioeth; 2017; 8(2):137-143. PubMed ID: 28949842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Conducting industrial and organizational psychological research: institutional review of research in work organizations.
    Ilgen DR; Bell BS
    Ethics Behav; 2001; 11(4):395-412. PubMed ID: 11838504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Bioethics training programmes for Africa: evaluating professional and bioethics-related achievements of African trainees after a decade of Fogarty NIH investment.
    Kass NE; Ali J; Hallez K; Hyder AA
    BMJ Open; 2016 Sep; 6(9):e012758. PubMed ID: 27633644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. How closely do institutional review boards follow the common rule?
    Lidz CW; Appelbaum PS; Arnold R; Candilis P; Gardner W; Myers S; Simon L
    Acad Med; 2012 Jul; 87(7):969-74. PubMed ID: 22622205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Investigators' successful strategies for working with Institutional Review Boards.
    Cartwright JC; Hickman SE; Nelson CA; Knafl KA
    Res Nurs Health; 2013 Oct; 36(5):478-86. PubMed ID: 23813748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. The challenges of IRB review and human subjects protections in practice-based research.
    Wolf LE; Croughan M; Lo B
    Med Care; 2002 Jun; 40(6):521-9. PubMed ID: 12021678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Bioethics as Object of Study: Dilemmas of Immanence in Research Ethics Review.
    DeMichelis C
    AJOB Empir Bioeth; 2021; 12(2):137-143. PubMed ID: 33890839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.