These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

142 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38447285)

  • 1. A comprehensive survey on protein-ligand binding site prediction.
    Xia Y; Pan X; Shen HB
    Curr Opin Struct Biol; 2024 Jun; 86():102793. PubMed ID: 38447285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. An accurate method for prediction of protein-ligand binding site on protein surface using SVM and statistical depth function.
    Wang K; Gao J; Shen S; Tuszynski JA; Ruan J; Hu G
    Biomed Res Int; 2013; 2013():409658. PubMed ID: 24195070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A D3R prospective evaluation of machine learning for protein-ligand scoring.
    Sunseri J; Ragoza M; Collins J; Koes DR
    J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2016 Sep; 30(9):761-771. PubMed ID: 27592011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A Random Forest Model for Predicting Allosteric and Functional Sites on Proteins.
    Chen AS; Westwood NJ; Brear P; Rogers GW; Mavridis L; Mitchell JB
    Mol Inform; 2016 Apr; 35(3-4):125-35. PubMed ID: 27491922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Coupling dynamics and evolutionary information with structure to identify protein regulatory and functional binding sites.
    Mishra SK; Kandoi G; Jernigan RL
    Proteins; 2019 Oct; 87(10):850-868. PubMed ID: 31141211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Machine learning in computational docking.
    Khamis MA; Gomaa W; Ahmed WF
    Artif Intell Med; 2015 Mar; 63(3):135-52. PubMed ID: 25724101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. PatchSurfers: Two methods for local molecular property-based binding ligand prediction.
    Shin WH; Bures MG; Kihara D
    Methods; 2016 Jan; 93():41-50. PubMed ID: 26427548
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Machine learning approaches in predicting allosteric sites.
    Nerín-Fonz F; Cournia Z
    Curr Opin Struct Biol; 2024 Apr; 85():102774. PubMed ID: 38354652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A Review of Computational Methods for Predicting Drug Targets.
    Huang G; Yan F; Tan D
    Curr Protein Pept Sci; 2018; 19(6):562-572. PubMed ID: 27842478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Persistent spectral hypergraph based machine learning (PSH-ML) for protein-ligand binding affinity prediction.
    Liu X; Feng H; Wu J; Xia K
    Brief Bioinform; 2021 Sep; 22(5):. PubMed ID: 33837771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Predicting Ligand Binding Sites on Protein Surfaces by 3-Dimensional Probability Density Distributions of Interacting Atoms.
    Jian JW; Elumalai P; Pitti T; Wu CY; Tsai KC; Chang JY; Peng HP; Yang AS
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(8):e0160315. PubMed ID: 27513851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Identification of Protein-Ligand Binding Sites by Sequence Information and Ensemble Classifier.
    Ding Y; Tang J; Guo F
    J Chem Inf Model; 2017 Dec; 57(12):3149-3161. PubMed ID: 29125297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Exploring Binding Pockets in the Conformational States of the SARS-CoV-2 Spike Trimers for the Screening of Allosteric Inhibitors Using Molecular Simulations and Ensemble-Based Ligand Docking.
    Gupta G; Verkhivker G
    Int J Mol Sci; 2024 May; 25(9):. PubMed ID: 38732174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Protein ligand binding site prediction using graph transformer neural network.
    Ishitani R; Takemoto M; Tomii K
    PLoS One; 2024; 19(8):e0308425. PubMed ID: 39106255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. MetaPocket: a meta approach to improve protein ligand binding site prediction.
    Huang B
    OMICS; 2009 Aug; 13(4):325-30. PubMed ID: 19645590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Machine Learning Approaches for Protein⁻Protein Interaction Hot Spot Prediction: Progress and Comparative Assessment.
    Liu S; Liu C; Deng L
    Molecules; 2018 Oct; 23(10):. PubMed ID: 30287797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. COACH-D: improved protein-ligand binding sites prediction with refined ligand-binding poses through molecular docking.
    Wu Q; Peng Z; Zhang Y; Yang J
    Nucleic Acids Res; 2018 Jul; 46(W1):W438-W442. PubMed ID: 29846643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A threading-based method (FINDSITE) for ligand-binding site prediction and functional annotation.
    Brylinski M; Skolnick J
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2008 Jan; 105(1):129-34. PubMed ID: 18165317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. GAPS: a geometric attention-based network for peptide binding site identification by the transfer learning approach.
    Zhu C; Zhang C; Shang T; Zhang C; Zhai S; Cao L; Xu Z; Su Z; Song Y; Su A; Li C; Duan H
    Brief Bioinform; 2024 May; 25(4):. PubMed ID: 38990514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Prediction of Protein-ligand Interaction Based on Sequence Similarity and Ligand Structural Features.
    Karasev D; Sobolev B; Lagunin A; Filimonov D; Poroikov V
    Int J Mol Sci; 2020 Oct; 21(21):. PubMed ID: 33142754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.