These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

140 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38448475)

  • 1. Systematic analysis of ChatGPT, Google search and Llama 2 for clinical decision support tasks.
    Sandmann S; Riepenhausen S; Plagwitz L; Varghese J
    Nat Commun; 2024 Mar; 15(1):2050. PubMed ID: 38448475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Benchmarking large language models' performances for myopia care: a comparative analysis of ChatGPT-3.5, ChatGPT-4.0, and Google Bard.
    Lim ZW; Pushpanathan K; Yew SME; Lai Y; Sun CH; Lam JSH; Chen DZ; Goh JHL; Tan MCJ; Sheng B; Cheng CY; Koh VTC; Tham YC
    EBioMedicine; 2023 Sep; 95():104770. PubMed ID: 37625267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Learning to Make Rare and Complex Diagnoses With Generative AI Assistance: Qualitative Study of Popular Large Language Models.
    Abdullahi T; Singh R; Eickhoff C
    JMIR Med Educ; 2024 Feb; 10():e51391. PubMed ID: 38349725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Evaluation of Large language model performance on the Multi-Specialty Recruitment Assessment (MSRA) exam.
    Tsoutsanis P; Tsoutsanis A
    Comput Biol Med; 2024 Jan; 168():107794. PubMed ID: 38043471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Evaluating Large Language Models for the National Premedical Exam in India: Comparative Analysis of GPT-3.5, GPT-4, and Bard.
    Farhat F; Chaudhry BM; Nadeem M; Sohail SS; Madsen DØ
    JMIR Med Educ; 2024 Feb; 10():e51523. PubMed ID: 38381486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evaluation of the Performance of Generative AI Large Language Models ChatGPT, Google Bard, and Microsoft Bing Chat in Supporting Evidence-Based Dentistry: Comparative Mixed Methods Study.
    Giannakopoulos K; Kavadella A; Aaqel Salim A; Stamatopoulos V; Kaklamanos EG
    J Med Internet Res; 2023 Dec; 25():e51580. PubMed ID: 38009003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Performance evaluation of ChatGPT, GPT-4, and Bard on the official board examination of the Japan Radiology Society.
    Toyama Y; Harigai A; Abe M; Nagano M; Kawabata M; Seki Y; Takase K
    Jpn J Radiol; 2024 Feb; 42(2):201-207. PubMed ID: 37792149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Evaluating Large Language Models in Extracting Cognitive Exam Dates and Scores.
    Zhang H; Jethani N; Jones S; Genes N; Major VJ; Jaffe IS; Cardillo AB; Heilenbach N; Ali NF; Bonanni LJ; Clayburn AJ; Khera Z; Sadler EC; Prasad J; Schlacter J; Liu K; Silva B; Montgomery S; Kim EJ; Lester J; Hill TM; Avoricani A; Chervonski E; Davydov J; Small W; Chakravartty E; Grover H; Dodson JA; Brody AA; Aphinyanaphongs Y; Masurkar A; Razavian N
    medRxiv; 2024 Feb; ():. PubMed ID: 38405784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Performance of ChatGPT, GPT-4, and Google Bard on a Neurosurgery Oral Boards Preparation Question Bank.
    Ali R; Tang OY; Connolly ID; Fridley JS; Shin JH; Zadnik Sullivan PL; Cielo D; Oyelese AA; Doberstein CE; Telfeian AE; Gokaslan ZL; Asaad WF
    Neurosurgery; 2023 Nov; 93(5):1090-1098. PubMed ID: 37306460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparing the performance of ChatGPT GPT-4, Bard, and Llama-2 in the Taiwan Psychiatric Licensing Examination and in differential diagnosis with multi-center psychiatrists.
    Li DJ; Kao YC; Tsai SJ; Bai YM; Yeh TC; Chu CS; Hsu CW; Cheng SW; Hsu TW; Liang CS; Su KP
    Psychiatry Clin Neurosci; 2024 Jun; 78(6):347-352. PubMed ID: 38404249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Stratified Evaluation of GPT's Question Answering in Surgery Reveals Artificial Intelligence (AI) Knowledge Gaps.
    Murphy Lonergan R; Curry J; Dhas K; Simmons BI
    Cureus; 2023 Nov; 15(11):e48788. PubMed ID: 38098921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Large Language Models in Hematology Case Solving: A Comparative Study of ChatGPT-3.5, Google Bard, and Microsoft Bing.
    Kumari A; Kumari A; Singh A; Singh SK; Juhi A; Dhanvijay AKD; Pinjar MJ; Mondal H
    Cureus; 2023 Aug; 15(8):e43861. PubMed ID: 37736448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Evaluating large language models on a highly-specialized topic, radiation oncology physics.
    Holmes J; Liu Z; Zhang L; Ding Y; Sio TT; McGee LA; Ashman JB; Li X; Liu T; Shen J; Liu W
    Front Oncol; 2023; 13():1219326. PubMed ID: 37529688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Assessing the Utility of ChatGPT Throughout the Entire Clinical Workflow: Development and Usability Study.
    Rao A; Pang M; Kim J; Kamineni M; Lie W; Prasad AK; Landman A; Dreyer K; Succi MD
    J Med Internet Res; 2023 Aug; 25():e48659. PubMed ID: 37606976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Utility of artificial intelligence-based large language models in ophthalmic care.
    Biswas S; Davies LN; Sheppard AL; Logan NS; Wolffsohn JS
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2024 May; 44(3):641-671. PubMed ID: 38404172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Large Language Models for Therapy Recommendations Across 3 Clinical Specialties: Comparative Study.
    Wilhelm TI; Roos J; Kaczmarczyk R
    J Med Internet Res; 2023 Oct; 25():e49324. PubMed ID: 37902826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Performance of Large Language Models (ChatGPT, Bing Search, and Google Bard) in Solving Case Vignettes in Physiology.
    Dhanvijay AKD; Pinjar MJ; Dhokane N; Sorte SR; Kumari A; Mondal H
    Cureus; 2023 Aug; 15(8):e42972. PubMed ID: 37671207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Artificial Intelligence in Medical Education: Comparative Analysis of ChatGPT, Bing, and Medical Students in Germany.
    Roos J; Kasapovic A; Jansen T; Kaczmarczyk R
    JMIR Med Educ; 2023 Sep; 9():e46482. PubMed ID: 37665620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Evaluation of the performance of GPT-3.5 and GPT-4 on the Polish Medical Final Examination.
    Rosoł M; Gąsior JS; Łaba J; Korzeniewski K; Młyńczak M
    Sci Rep; 2023 Nov; 13(1):20512. PubMed ID: 37993519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.