These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
132 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38449762)
1. Blame framing and prior knowledge influence moral judgments for people involved in the Tulsa Race Massacre among a combined Oklahoma and UK sample. Durham JD; Rosen AFG; Gronlund SD Front Psychol; 2024; 15():1251238. PubMed ID: 38449762 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Information-Acquisition Processes in Moral Judgments of Blame. Guglielmo S; Malle BF Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2017 Jul; 43(7):957-971. PubMed ID: 28903702 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Blame, not ability, impacts moral "ought" judgments for impossible actions: Toward an empirical refutation of "ought" implies "can". Chituc V; Henne P; Sinnott-Armstrong W; De Brigard F Cognition; 2016 May; 150():20-5. PubMed ID: 26848732 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. People systematically update moral judgments of blame. Monroe AE; Malle BF J Pers Soc Psychol; 2019 Feb; 116(2):215-236. PubMed ID: 30359071 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Subtle linguistic cues influence perceived blame and financial liability. Fausey CM; Boroditsky L Psychon Bull Rev; 2010 Oct; 17(5):644-50. PubMed ID: 21037161 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Crime and punishment: distinguishing the roles of causal and intentional analyses in moral judgment. Cushman F Cognition; 2008 Aug; 108(2):353-80. PubMed ID: 18439575 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Direct and indirect freedom in addiction: Folk free will and blame judgments are sensitive to the choice history of drug users. Taylor M; Maranges HM; Chen SK; Vonasch AJ Conscious Cogn; 2021 Sep; 94():103170. PubMed ID: 34320424 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Valence framing effects on moral judgments: A meta-analysis. McDonald K; Graves R; Yin S; Weese T; Sinnott-Armstrong W Cognition; 2021 Jul; 212():104703. PubMed ID: 33965894 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. They should have known better: The roles of negligence and outcome in moral judgements of accidental actions. Nobes G; Martin JW Br J Psychol; 2022 May; 113(2):370-395. PubMed ID: 34719018 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Two paths to blame: Intentionality directs moral information processing along two distinct tracks. Monroe AE; Malle BF J Exp Psychol Gen; 2017 Jan; 146(1):123-133. PubMed ID: 28054816 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Where the Blame Lies: Unpacking Groups Into Their Constituent Subgroups Shifts Judgments of Blame in Intergroup Conflict. Halevy N; Maoz I; Vani P; Reit ES Psychol Sci; 2022 Jan; 33(1):76-89. PubMed ID: 34846949 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Moral Judgments. Malle BF Annu Rev Psychol; 2021 Jan; 72():293-318. PubMed ID: 32886588 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Asymmetric morality: Blame is more differentiated and more extreme than praise. Guglielmo S; Malle BF PLoS One; 2019; 14(3):e0213544. PubMed ID: 30861034 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. No luck for moral luck. Kneer M; Machery E Cognition; 2019 Jan; 182():331-348. PubMed ID: 30428399 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Norm status, rather than norm type or blameworthiness, results in the side-effect effect. Lin Z; Yu J; Zhu L Psych J; 2019 Dec; 8(4):513-519. PubMed ID: 31144460 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Who Is to Blame? Children's and Adults' Moral Judgments Regarding Victim and Transgressor Negligence. Mulvey KL; Gönültaş S; Richardson CB Cogn Sci; 2020 Apr; 44(4):e12833. PubMed ID: 32274859 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Cold Side-Effect Effect: Affect Does Not Mediate the Influence of Moral Considerations in Intentionality Judgments. Díaz R; Viciana H; Gomila A Front Psychol; 2017; 8():295. PubMed ID: 28293211 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Inability and Obligation in Moral Judgment. Buckwalter W; Turri J PLoS One; 2015; 10(8):e0136589. PubMed ID: 26296206 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Judgments of cause and blame: the effects of intentionality and foreseeability. Lagnado DA; Channon S Cognition; 2008 Sep; 108(3):754-70. PubMed ID: 18706537 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The effect of framing and communicating COVID-19 vaccine side-effect risks on vaccine intentions for adults in the UK and the USA: A structured summary of a study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Sudharsanan N; Favaretti C; Hachaturyan V; Bärnighausen T; Vandormael A Trials; 2021 Sep; 22(1):592. PubMed ID: 34488843 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]