These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

141 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38450931)

  • 1. Long-term survival and success rate of dental implants placed in reconstructed areas with extraoral autogenous bone grafts: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Moraschini V; Louro RS; Son A; Calasans-Maia MD; Sartoretto SC; Shibli JA
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2024 Jun; 26(3):469-481. PubMed ID: 38450931
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Which hard tissue augmentation techniques are the most successful in furnishing bony support for implant placement?
    Aghaloo TL; Moy PK
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2007; 22 Suppl():49-70. PubMed ID: 18437791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. EFFECT OF AUTOGENOUS BONE GRAFT SITE ON DENTAL IMPLANT SURVIVAL AND DONOR SITE COMPLICATIONS: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS.
    McKenna GJ; Gjengedal H; Harkin J; Holland N; Moore C; Srinivasan M
    J Evid Based Dent Pract; 2022 Sep; 22(3):101731. PubMed ID: 36162883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Evaluation of peri-implant bone resorption around Straumann Bone Level implants placed in areas reconstructed with autogenous vertical onlay bone grafts.
    Chiapasco M; Casentini P; Zaniboni M; Corsi E
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2012 Sep; 23(9):1012-21. PubMed ID: 22092480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effect of maxillary sinus augmentation on the survival of endosseous dental implants. A systematic review.
    Wallace SS; Froum SJ
    Ann Periodontol; 2003 Dec; 8(1):328-43. PubMed ID: 14971260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Apical and marginal bone alterations around implants in maxillary sinus augmentation grafted with autogenous bone or bovine bone material and simultaneous or delayed dental implant positioning.
    Sbordone L; Levin L; Guidetti F; Sbordone C; Glikman A; Schwartz-Arad D
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2011 May; 22(5):485-91. PubMed ID: 21087315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A long-term retrospective study of two different implant surfaces placed after reconstruction of the severely resorbed maxilla using Le Fort I osteotomy and interpositional bone grafting.
    Marchetti C; Pieri F; Corinaldesi G; Degidi M
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2008; 23(5):911-8. PubMed ID: 19014162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Clinical and patient-reported outcomes of implants placed in autogenous bone grafts and implants placed in native bone: A case-control study with a follow-up of 5-16 years.
    Thoma DS; Maggetti I; Waller T; Hämmerle CHF; Jung RE
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2019 Mar; 30(3):242-251. PubMed ID: 30698868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Success of dental implants placed in intraoral block bone grafts.
    Levin L; Nitzan D; Schwartz-Arad D
    J Periodontol; 2007 Jan; 78(1):18-21. PubMed ID: 17199534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Evaluation of survival and success rates of dental implants placed at the time of or after alveolar ridge augmentation with an autogenous mandibular bone graft and titanium mesh: a 3- to 8-year retrospective study.
    Corinaldesi G; Pieri F; Sapigni L; Marchetti C
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(6):1119-28. PubMed ID: 20162118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Alternative bone expansion technique for implant placement in atrophic edentulous maxilla and mandible.
    Demetriades N; Park JI; Laskarides C
    J Oral Implantol; 2011 Aug; 37(4):463-71. PubMed ID: 20662673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Implant survival in maxillary and mandibular osseous onlay grafts and native bone: a 3-year clinical and computerized tomographic follow-up.
    Sbordone L; Toti P; Menchini-Fabris G; Sbordone C; Guidetti F
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(4):695-703. PubMed ID: 19885411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Long-term peri-implant bone level changes of non-vascularized fibula bone grafted edentulous patients.
    Duttenhoefer F; Nack C; Doll C; Raguse JD; Hell B; Stricker A; Nelson K; Nahles S
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2015 Jun; 43(5):611-5. PubMed ID: 25863644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Dental implants placed simultaneously with bone grafts in horizontal defects: a clinical retrospective study with 37 patients.
    Boronat A; Carrillo C; Penarrocha M; Pennarocha M
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2010; 25(1):189-96. PubMed ID: 20209201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Clinical Outcome of Implants Placed in Staged Maxillary Sinus Augmentation Using Bovine Bone Mineral Mixed with Autogenous Bone at Three Different Ratios: A 5-Year Prospective Follow-up Study.
    Krennmair S; Weinländer M; Malek M; Forstner T; Krennmair G; Stimmelmayr M
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2018; 33(21):1351-1361. PubMed ID: 30427967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Implant survival rates after maxillary sinus augmentation.
    Del Fabbro M; Rosano G; Taschieri S
    Eur J Oral Sci; 2008 Dec; 116(6):497-506. PubMed ID: 19049518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Maxillary alveolar ridge reconstruction with nonvascularized autogenous block bone: clinical results.
    Barone A; Covani U
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2007 Oct; 65(10):2039-46. PubMed ID: 17884536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Custom-made computer-aided-design/ computer-assisted-manufacturing (CAD/CAM) synthetic bone grafts for alveolar ridge augmentation: A retrospective clinical study with 3 years of follow-up.
    Mangano C; Luongo G; Luongo F; Lerner H; Margiani B; Admakin O; Mangano F
    J Dent; 2022 Dec; 127():104323. PubMed ID: 36241044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Peri-implant Hard and Soft Tissue Stability in Implants Placed Simultaneously Versus Delayed with Intraoral Block Bone Grafts in Horizontal Defects: A Retrospective Case Series Study.
    Aloy-Prósper A; Peñarrocha-Oltra D; Peñarrocha-Diago M; Camacho-Alonso F; Peñarrocha-Diago M
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2016; 31(1):133-41. PubMed ID: 26800170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Implant treatment in atrophic posterior mandibles: vertical regeneration with block bone grafts versus implants with 5.5-mm intrabony length.
    Peñarrocha-Oltra D; Aloy-Prósper A; Cervera-Ballester J; Peñarrocha-Diago M; Canullo L; Peñarrocha-Diago M
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2014; 29(3):659-66. PubMed ID: 24818205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.