These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

124 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38451700)

  • 21. Who sees which political falsehoods as more acceptable and why: A new look at in-group loyalty and trustworthiness.
    Galak J; Critcher CR
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2023 Mar; 124(3):593-619. PubMed ID: 35708929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Seeing beyond political affiliations: The mediating role of perceived moral foundations on the partisan similarity-liking effect.
    Bruchmann K; Koopmann-Holm B; Scherer A
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(8):e0202101. PubMed ID: 30157213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Partisan self-interest is an important driver for people's support for the regulation of targeted political advertising.
    Baum K; Meissner S; Krasnova H
    PLoS One; 2021; 16(5):e0250506. PubMed ID: 33979358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. The Effect of Ideological Identification on the Endorsement of Moral Values Depends on the Target Group.
    Voelkel JG; Brandt MJ
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2019 Jun; 45(6):851-863. PubMed ID: 30317915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Measuring moral politics: How strict and nurturant family values explain individual differences in conservatism, liberalism, and the political middle.
    Feinberg M; Wehling E; Chung JM; Saslow LR; Melvær Paulin I
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2020 Apr; 118(4):777-804. PubMed ID: 31246064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Rethinking the link between cognitive sophistication and politically motivated reasoning.
    Tappin BM; Pennycook G; Rand DG
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2021 Jun; 150(6):1095-1114. PubMed ID: 33119359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. An Examination of Aggressive Beliefs and Attitudes in Relation to Political Affiliation and Candidate Endorsement in the United States.
    Michel JS; Bardeen JR
    J Psychol; 2019; 153(8):803-819. PubMed ID: 31188715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. "Wise reasoning benefits from emodiversity, irrespective of emotional intensity": Correction to Grossmann, Oakes, and Santos (2019).
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2019 May; 148(5):862. PubMed ID: 31070439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Mixed partisan households and electoral participation in the United States.
    Hersh E; Ghitza Y
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(10):e0203997. PubMed ID: 30303974
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. The Montagu Principle: Incivility decreases politicians' public approval, even with their political base.
    Frimer JA; Skitka LJ
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2018 Nov; 115(5):845-866. PubMed ID: 30124301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Exaggerated meta-perceptions predict intergroup hostility between American political partisans.
    Moore-Berg SL; Ankori-Karlinsky LO; Hameiri B; Bruneau E
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2020 Jun; 117(26):14864-14872. PubMed ID: 32527858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Respect and political disagreement: Can intergroup respect reduce the biased evaluation of outgroup arguments?
    Eschert S; Simon B
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(3):e0211556. PubMed ID: 30913232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Toward a Developmental Science of Politics.
    Patterson MM; Bigler RS; Pahlke E; Brown CS; Hayes AR; Ramirez MC; Nelson A
    Monogr Soc Res Child Dev; 2019 Sep; 84(3):7-185. PubMed ID: 31503346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Re-examining the spread of moralized rhetoric from political elites: Effects of valence and ideology.
    Wang SN; Inbar Y
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2022 Dec; 151(12):3292-3303. PubMed ID: 35727315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Identity-motivated reasoning: Biased judgments regarding political leaders and their actions.
    Arieli S; Amit A; Mentser S
    Cognition; 2019 Jul; 188():64-73. PubMed ID: 30579612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Reducing opinion polarization: Effects of exposure to similar people with differing political views.
    Balietti S; Getoor L; Goldstein DG; Watts DJ
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2021 Dec; 118(52):. PubMed ID: 34937747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Interventions to reduce partisan animosity.
    Hartman R; Blakey W; Womick J; Bail C; Finkel EJ; Han H; Sarrouf J; Schroeder J; Sheeran P; Van Bavel JJ; Willer R; Gray K
    Nat Hum Behav; 2022 Sep; 6(9):1194-1205. PubMed ID: 36123534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Wisdom, bias, and balance: Toward a process-sensitive measurement of wisdom-related cognition.
    Brienza JP; Kung FYH; Santos HC; Bobocel DR; Grossmann I
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2018 Dec; 115(6):1093-1126. PubMed ID: 28933874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Advancing the discourse of Muslim politics in Indonesia: A study on political orientation of Kiai as religious elites in Nahdlatul Ulama.
    Yani MT; Mahfud C; Rangga Sa'adillah SAP; Bustami MR; Maskuri ; Taufiq A
    Heliyon; 2022 Dec; 8(12):e12218. PubMed ID: 36544840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Perceiving political polarization in the United States: party identity strength and attitude extremity exacerbate the perceived partisan divide.
    Westfall J; Van Boven L; Chambers JR; Judd CM
    Perspect Psychol Sci; 2015 Mar; 10(2):145-58. PubMed ID: 25910386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.