These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
170 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38451998)
1. Underwater versus conventional endoscopic mucosal resection for ≥10 mm sessile or flat colorectal polyps: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Wang X; Wang Y; Cao X; Zhang C; Miao L PLoS One; 2024; 19(3):e0299931. PubMed ID: 38451998 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Underwater vs Conventional Endoscopic Mucosal Resection of Large Sessile or Flat Colorectal Polyps: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial. Nagl S; Ebigbo A; Goelder SK; Roemmele C; Neuhaus L; Weber T; Braun G; Probst A; Schnoy E; Kafel AJ; Muzalyova A; Messmann H Gastroenterology; 2021 Nov; 161(5):1460-1474.e1. PubMed ID: 34371000 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Underwater versus conventional endoscopic mucosal resection for sessile colorectal polyps: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis. Sundaram S; Seth V; Jearth V; Giri S Rev Esp Enferm Dig; 2023 May; 115(5):225-233. PubMed ID: 36148677 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Underwater versus conventional endoscopic mucosal resection for small size non-pedunculated colorectal polyps: a randomized controlled trial : (UEMR vs. CEMR for small size non-pedunculated colorectal polyps). Zhang Z; Xia Y; Cui H; Yuan X; Wang C; Xie J; Tong Y; Wang W; Xu L BMC Gastroenterol; 2020 Sep; 20(1):311. PubMed ID: 32967616 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Underwater versus conventional endoscopic mucosal resection for colorectal lesions: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials. de Souza MHG; do Espirito Santo PA; Maluf-Filho F; Lenz L Int J Colorectal Dis; 2023 Aug; 38(1):208. PubMed ID: 37552342 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Endoscopic mucosal resection-precutting Zhang XQ; Sang JZ; Xu L; Mao XL; Li B; Zhu WL; Yang XY; Yu CH World J Gastroenterol; 2022 Dec; 28(45):6397-6409. PubMed ID: 36533110 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Underwater versus conventional EMR for colorectal polyps: systematic review and meta-analysis. Choi AY; Moosvi Z; Shah S; Roccato MK; Wang AY; Hamerski CM; Samarasena JB Gastrointest Endosc; 2021 Feb; 93(2):378-389. PubMed ID: 33068608 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Underwater versus conventional EMR of large nonpedunculated colorectal lesions: a multicenter randomized controlled trial. Rodríguez Sánchez J; Alvarez-Gonzalez MA; Pellisé M; Coto-Ugarte D; Uchima H; Aranda-Hernández J; Santiago García J; Marín-Gabriel JC; Riu Pons F; Nogales O; Carreño Macian R; Herreros-de-Tejada A; Hernández L; Patrón GO; Rodriguez-Tellez M; Redondo-Cerezo E; Sánchez Alonso M; Daca M; Valdivielso-Cortazar E; Álvarez Delgado A; Enguita M; Montori S; Albéniz E Gastrointest Endosc; 2023 May; 97(5):941-951.e2. PubMed ID: 36572129 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Underwater endoscopic mucosal resection is associated with fewer recurrences and earlier curative resections compared to conventional endoscopic mucosal resection for large colorectal polyps. Schenck RJ; Jahann DA; Patrie JT; Stelow EB; Cox DG; Uppal DS; Sauer BG; Shami VM; Strand DS; Wang AY Surg Endosc; 2017 Oct; 31(10):4174-4183. PubMed ID: 28342125 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The efficacy and safety of underwater endoscopic mucosal resection for ≥10-mm colorectal polyps: systematic review and meta-analysis. Li DF; Lai MG; Yang MF; Zou ZY; Xu J; Peng RM; Xiong F; Wei C; Zhang DG; Xu ZL; Wang LS; Yao J Endoscopy; 2021 Jun; 53(6):636-646. PubMed ID: 32767283 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Underwater versus conventional EMR for nonpedunculated colorectal lesions: a randomized clinical trial. Lenz L; Martins B; Andrade de Paulo G; Kawaguti FS; Baba ER; Uemura RS; Gusmon CC; Geiger SN; Moura RN; Pennacchi C; Simas de Lima M; Safatle-Ribeiro AV; Hashimoto CL; Ribeiro U; Maluf-Filho F Gastrointest Endosc; 2023 Mar; 97(3):549-558. PubMed ID: 36309072 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Underwater Endoscopic Mucosal Resection Versus Conventional Endoscopic Mucosal Resection for Superficial Non-ampullary Duodenal Epithelial Tumors ≤20 mm: A Systematic Review With Meta-analysis. Yin Z; Li J; Yang W; Huang W; Xu D; Lei X; Zhang J J Clin Gastroenterol; 2023 Oct; 57(9):928-936. PubMed ID: 36084162 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Underwater versus conventional endoscopic mucosal resection for colorectal lesions: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Garg R; Singh A; Mohan BP; Mankaney G; Regueiro M; Chahal P Endosc Int Open; 2020 Dec; 8(12):E1884-E1894. PubMed ID: 33269325 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Underwater endoscopic mucosal resection for colorectal lesions: a meta-analysis. Li P; Ma B; Gong S; Zhang X; Li W Surg Endosc; 2021 Jun; 35(6):3003-3013. PubMed ID: 32577813 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Underwater Versus Conventional Endoscopic Mucosal Resection for Superficial Non-ampullary Duodenal Epithelial Tumors: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Lee JG; Lee SP; Jang HJ; Kae SH Dig Dis Sci; 2023 Apr; 68(4):1482-1491. PubMed ID: 36346490 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]