These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

160 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38453736)

  • 1. A differential impact of action-effect temporal contiguity on different measures of response inhibition in the Go\No-Go and Stop-signal paradigms.
    Karsh N; Soker-Mijalevich E; Horovitz O
    Psychol Res; 2024 Jun; 88(4):1157-1168. PubMed ID: 38453736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Differences in unity: The go/no-go and stop signal tasks rely on different mechanisms.
    Raud L; Westerhausen R; Dooley N; Huster RJ
    Neuroimage; 2020 Apr; 210():116582. PubMed ID: 31987997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Neural processes of preparatory control for stop signal inhibition.
    Hu S; Li CS
    Hum Brain Mapp; 2012 Dec; 33(12):2785-96. PubMed ID: 21976392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Independent component analysis of functional networks for response inhibition: Inter-subject variation in stop signal reaction time.
    Zhang S; Tsai SJ; Hu S; Xu J; Chao HH; Calhoun VD; Li CS
    Hum Brain Mapp; 2015 Sep; 36(9):3289-302. PubMed ID: 26089095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Evidence for selective adjustments of inhibitory control in a variant of the stop signal task.
    Xu KZ; Mayse JD; Courtney S
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2019 Apr; 72(4):818-831. PubMed ID: 29589791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A dual but asymmetric role of the dorsal anterior cingulate cortex in response inhibition and switching from a non-salient to salient action.
    Manza P; Hu S; Chao HH; Zhang S; Leung HC; Li CR
    Neuroimage; 2016 Jul; 134():466-474. PubMed ID: 27126003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Preparation to inhibit a response complements response inhibition during performance of a stop-signal task.
    Chikazoe J; Jimura K; Hirose S; Yamashita K; Miyashita Y; Konishi S
    J Neurosci; 2009 Dec; 29(50):15870-7. PubMed ID: 20016103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Inhibition-induced forgetting: when more control leads to less memory.
    Chiu YC; Egner T
    Psychol Sci; 2015 Jan; 26(1):27-38. PubMed ID: 25398560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Stop-signal delay reflects response selection duration in stop-signal task.
    Aksiotis V; Myachykov A; Tumyalis A
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2023 Aug; 85(6):1976-1989. PubMed ID: 37415061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The effect of task complexity on the neural network for response inhibition: An ALE meta-analysis.
    Aziz-Safaie T; Müller VI; Langner R; Eickhoff SB; Cieslik EC
    Neurosci Biobehav Rev; 2024 Mar; 158():105544. PubMed ID: 38220034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Common and Unique Inhibitory Control Signatures of Action-Stopping and Attentional Capture Suggest That Actions Are Stopped in Two Stages.
    Tatz JR; Soh C; Wessel JR
    J Neurosci; 2021 Oct; 41(42):8826-8838. PubMed ID: 34493541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Perceptual Surprise Improves Action Stopping by Nonselectively Suppressing Motor Activity via a Neural Mechanism for Motor Inhibition.
    Dutra IC; Waller DA; Wessel JR
    J Neurosci; 2018 Feb; 38(6):1482-1492. PubMed ID: 29305533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The Right Superior Frontal Gyrus and Individual Variation in Proactive Control of Impulsive Response.
    Hu S; Ide JS; Zhang S; Li CR
    J Neurosci; 2016 Dec; 36(50):12688-12696. PubMed ID: 27974616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Prepotent motor activity and inhibitory control demands in different variants of the go/no-go paradigm.
    Wessel JR
    Psychophysiology; 2018 Mar; 55(3):. PubMed ID: 28390090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Moderate acute alcohol use impairs intentional inhibition rather than stimulus-driven inhibition.
    Liu Y; Grasman RPPP; Wiers RW; Ridderinkhof KR; van den Wildenberg WPM
    Psychol Res; 2021 Jun; 85(4):1449-1461. PubMed ID: 32430540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. An effect that counts: Temporally contiguous action effect enhances motor performance.
    Karsh N; Ahmad Z; Erez F; Hadad BS
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2024 Apr; 31(2):897-905. PubMed ID: 37798417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Inhibition-Induced Forgetting Results from Resource Competition between Response Inhibition and Memory Encoding Processes.
    Chiu YC; Egner T
    J Neurosci; 2015 Aug; 35(34):11936-45. PubMed ID: 26311775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Task manipulation effects on the relationship between working memory and go/no-go task performance.
    Wiemers EA; Redick TS
    Conscious Cogn; 2019 May; 71():39-58. PubMed ID: 30928898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Frozen in (e)motion: How reactive motor inhibition is influenced by the emotional content of stimuli in healthy and psychiatric populations.
    Battaglia S; Serio G; Scarpazza C; D'Ausilio A; Borgomaneri S
    Behav Res Ther; 2021 Nov; 146():103963. PubMed ID: 34530318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Attention-related modulation of frontal midline theta oscillations in cingulate cortex during a spatial cueing Go/NoGo task.
    Hong X; Sun J; Wang J; Li C; Tong S
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2020 Feb; 148():1-12. PubMed ID: 31857191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.