161 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38454481)
1. Clinically relevant gene signatures provide independent prognostic information in older breast cancer patients.
Castresana-Aguirre M; Johansson A; Matikas A; Foukakis T; Lindström LS; Tobin NP
Breast Cancer Res; 2024 Mar; 26(1):38. PubMed ID: 38454481
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Concordance among gene expression-based predictors for ER-positive breast cancer treated with adjuvant tamoxifen.
Prat A; Parker JS; Fan C; Cheang MCU; Miller LD; Bergh J; Chia SKL; Bernard PS; Nielsen TO; Ellis MJ; Carey LA; Perou CM
Ann Oncol; 2012 Nov; 23(11):2866-2873. PubMed ID: 22532584
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Cross comparison and prognostic assessment of breast cancer multigene signatures in a large population-based contemporary clinical series.
Vallon-Christersson J; Häkkinen J; Hegardt C; Saal LH; Larsson C; Ehinger A; Lindman H; Olofsson H; Sjöblom T; Wärnberg F; Ryden L; Loman N; Malmberg M; Borg Å; Staaf J
Sci Rep; 2019 Aug; 9(1):12184. PubMed ID: 31434940
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Prognostic ability of EndoPredict compared to research-based versions of the PAM50 risk of recurrence (ROR) scores in node-positive, estrogen receptor-positive, and HER2-negative breast cancer. A GEICAM/9906 sub-study.
Martin M; Brase JC; Ruiz A; Prat A; Kronenwett R; Calvo L; Petry C; Bernard PS; Ruiz-Borrego M; Weber KE; Rodriguez CA; Alvarez IM; Segui MA; Perou CM; Casas M; Carrasco E; Caballero R; Rodriguez-Lescure A
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2016 Feb; 156(1):81-9. PubMed ID: 26909792
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. PAM50 Provides Prognostic Information When Applied to the Lymph Node Metastases of Advanced Breast Cancer Patients.
Tobin NP; Lundberg A; Lindström LS; Harrell JC; Foukakis T; Carlsson L; Einbeigi Z; Linderholm BK; Loman N; Malmberg M; Fernö M; Czene K; Perou CM; Bergh J; Hatschek T;
Clin Cancer Res; 2017 Dec; 23(23):7225-7231. PubMed ID: 28972041
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. The effects of lymph node status on predicting outcome in ER+ /HER2- tamoxifen treated breast cancer patients using gene signatures.
Cockburn JG; Hallett RM; Gillgrass AE; Dias KN; Whelan T; Levine MN; Hassell JA; Bane A
BMC Cancer; 2016 Jul; 16():555. PubMed ID: 27469239
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A comparison of PAM50 intrinsic subtyping with immunohistochemistry and clinical prognostic factors in tamoxifen-treated estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer.
Nielsen TO; Parker JS; Leung S; Voduc D; Ebbert M; Vickery T; Davies SR; Snider J; Stijleman IJ; Reed J; Cheang MC; Mardis ER; Perou CM; Bernard PS; Ellis MJ
Clin Cancer Res; 2010 Nov; 16(21):5222-32. PubMed ID: 20837693
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Gene Expression Signatures and Immunohistochemical Subtypes Add Prognostic Value to Each Other in Breast Cancer Cohorts.
Lundberg A; Lindström LS; Harrell JC; Falato C; Carlson JW; Wright PK; Foukakis T; Perou CM; Czene K; Bergh J; Tobin NP
Clin Cancer Res; 2017 Dec; 23(24):7512-7520. PubMed ID: 28972043
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of the Performance of 6 Prognostic Signatures for Estrogen Receptor-Positive Breast Cancer: A Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Clinical Trial.
Sestak I; Buus R; Cuzick J; Dubsky P; Kronenwett R; Denkert C; Ferree S; Sgroi D; Schnabel C; Baehner FL; Mallon E; Dowsett M
JAMA Oncol; 2018 Apr; 4(4):545-553. PubMed ID: 29450494
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Predicting distant recurrence in receptor-positive breast cancer patients with limited clinicopathological risk: using the PAM50 Risk of Recurrence score in 1478 postmenopausal patients of the ABCSG-8 trial treated with adjuvant endocrine therapy alone.
Gnant M; Filipits M; Greil R; Stoeger H; Rudas M; Bago-Horvath Z; Mlineritsch B; Kwasny W; Knauer M; Singer C; Jakesz R; Dubsky P; Fitzal F; Bartsch R; Steger G; Balic M; Ressler S; Cowens JW; Storhoff J; Ferree S; Schaper C; Liu S; Fesl C; Nielsen TO;
Ann Oncol; 2014 Feb; 25(2):339-45. PubMed ID: 24347518
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Novel 18-gene signature for predicting relapse in ER-positive, HER2-negative breast cancer.
Buus R; Yeo B; Brentnall AR; Klintman M; Cheang MCU; Khabra K; Sestak I; Gao Q; Cuzick J; Dowsett M
Breast Cancer Res; 2018 Sep; 20(1):103. PubMed ID: 30180877
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Identifying clinically relevant prognostic subgroups of postmenopausal women with node-positive hormone receptor-positive early-stage breast cancer treated with endocrine therapy: a combined analysis of ABCSG-8 and ATAC using the PAM50 risk of recurrence score and intrinsic subtype.
Gnant M; Sestak I; Filipits M; Dowsett M; Balic M; Lopez-Knowles E; Greil R; Dubsky P; Stoeger H; Rudas M; Jakesz R; Ferree S; Cowens JW; Nielsen T; Schaper C; Fesl C; Cuzick J
Ann Oncol; 2015 Aug; 26(8):1685-91. PubMed ID: 25935792
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Assessment of 25-Year Survival of Women With Estrogen Receptor-Positive/ERBB2-Negative Breast Cancer Treated With and Without Tamoxifen Therapy: A Secondary Analysis of Data From the Stockholm Tamoxifen Randomized Clinical Trial.
Dar H; Johansson A; Nordenskjöld A; Iftimi A; Yau C; Perez-Tenorio G; Benz C; Nordenskjöld B; Stål O; Esserman LJ; Fornander T; Lindström LS
JAMA Netw Open; 2021 Jun; 4(6):e2114904. PubMed ID: 34190995
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of the Nottingham Prognostic Index and OncotypeDX© recurrence score in predicting outcome in estrogen receptor positive breast cancer.
Kerin EP; Davey MG; McLaughlin RP; Sweeney KJ; Barry MK; Malone CM; Elwahab SA; Lowery AJ; Kerin MJ
Breast; 2022 Dec; 66():227-235. PubMed ID: 36335747
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Identification of a prognostic LncRNA signature for ER-positive, ER-negative and triple-negative breast cancers.
Liu D
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2020 Aug; 183(1):95-105. PubMed ID: 32601968
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Prognostic and predictive value of androgen receptor expression in postmenopausal women with estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer: results from the Breast International Group Trial 1-98.
Kensler KH; Regan MM; Heng YJ; Baker GM; Pyle ME; Schnitt SJ; Hazra A; Kammler R; Thürlimann B; Colleoni M; Viale G; Brown M; Tamimi RM
Breast Cancer Res; 2019 Feb; 21(1):30. PubMed ID: 30795773
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Clinical outcome and global gene expression data support the existence of the estrogen receptor-negative/progesterone receptor-positive invasive breast cancer phenotype.
Schroth W; Winter S; Büttner F; Goletz S; Faißt S; Brinkmann F; Saladores P; Heidemann E; Ott G; Gerteis A; Alscher MD; Dippon J; Schwab M; Brauch H; Fritz P
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2016 Jan; 155(1):85-97. PubMed ID: 26650824
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Outcomes in patients with early-stage breast cancer who underwent a 21-gene expression assay.
Barcenas CH; Raghavendra A; Sinha AK; Syed MP; Hsu L; Patangan MG; Chavez-MacGregor M; Shen Y; Hortobagyi GH; Valero V; Giordano SH; Ueno NT; Tripathy D
Cancer; 2017 Jul; 123(13):2422-2431. PubMed ID: 28199747
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Prognostic value of PAM50 and risk of recurrence score in patients with early-stage breast cancer with long-term follow-up.
Ohnstad HO; Borgen E; Falk RS; Lien TG; Aaserud M; Sveli MAT; Kyte JA; Kristensen VN; Geitvik GA; Schlichting E; Wist EA; Sørlie T; Russnes HG; Naume B
Breast Cancer Res; 2017 Nov; 19(1):120. PubMed ID: 29137653
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Molecular essence and endocrine responsiveness of estrogen receptor-negative, progesterone receptor-positive, and HER2-negative breast cancer.
Yu KD; Jiang YZ; Hao S; Shao ZM
BMC Med; 2015 Oct; 13():254. PubMed ID: 26437901
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
