BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

148 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38457577)

  • 1. Comparison of survival outcome of open, total laparoscopic, and laparoscopy-assisted radical vaginal hysterectomy for stage IB2 cervical cancer patients: A multicenter retrospective study.
    Yoon HJ; Kwon BS; Rho HJ; Lee TH; Jeong DH; Kim KH; Suh DS; Song YJ
    Medicine (Baltimore); 2024 Mar; 103(10):e37426. PubMed ID: 38457577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of long-term survival of total abdominal radical hysterectomy and laparoscopy-assisted radical vaginal hysterectomy in patients with early cervical cancer: Korean multicenter, retrospective analysis.
    Kwon BS; Roh HJ; Lee S; Yang J; Song YJ; Lee SH; Kim KH; Suh DS
    Gynecol Oncol; 2020 Dec; 159(3):642-648. PubMed ID: 33041070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A comparison of laparascopic-assisted radical vaginal hysterectomy and radical abdominal hysterectomy in the treatment of cervical cancer.
    Steed H; Rosen B; Murphy J; Laframboise S; De Petrillo D; Covens A
    Gynecol Oncol; 2004 Jun; 93(3):588-93. PubMed ID: 15196849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A phase III randomized clinical trial comparing laparoscopic or robotic radical hysterectomy with abdominal radical hysterectomy in patients with early stage cervical cancer.
    Obermair A; Gebski V; Frumovitz M; Soliman PT; Schmeler KM; Levenback C; Ramirez PT
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2008; 15(5):584-8. PubMed ID: 18722970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Feasibility and outcome of total laparoscopic radical hysterectomy with no-look no-touch technique for FIGO IB1 cervical cancer.
    Kanao H; Matsuo K; Aoki Y; Tanigawa T; Nomura H; Okamoto S; Takeshima N
    J Gynecol Oncol; 2019 May; 30(3):e71. PubMed ID: 30887768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Vaginal-assisted laparoscopic radical hysterectomy (VALRH) versus laparoscopic-assisted radical vaginal hysterectomy (LARVH) in the treatment of cervical cancer: surgical results and oncologic outcome.
    Lanowska M; Brink-Spalink V; Mangler M; Grittner U; von Tucher E; Schneider A; Köhler C
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2014 Jun; 289(6):1293-300. PubMed ID: 24362556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Laparoscopically assisted radical vaginal hysterectomy versus radical abdominal hysterectomy for the treatment of early cervical cancer.
    Kucukmetin A; Biliatis I; Naik R; Bryant A
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2013 Oct; 2013(10):CD006651. PubMed ID: 24085528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Oncologic outcomes of early stage cervical cancer performed operation by different laparoscopic surgical procedures: analysis of clinical data from mutiple centers].
    Ling KJ; Wang YZ; Zhang H; Zhang XY; Yang JJ; Luo CY; Song B; Zhang WX; Deng L; Chen GL; Li YD; Hu QY; Chen Y; Wang X; Zhang J; Ding JX; Ren T; Kang S; Hua KQ; Xiang Y; Cheng WW; Liang ZQ
    Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2020 Sep; 55(9):617-623. PubMed ID: 32957750
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Total laparoscopic versus open radical hysterectomy in stage IA2-IB1 cervical cancer: disease recurrence and survival comparison.
    Toptas T; Simsek T
    J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A; 2014 Jun; 24(6):373-8. PubMed ID: 24742012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Oncological safety of laparoscopic-assisted vaginal radical trachelectomy (LARVT or Dargent's operation): a comparative study with laparoscopic-assisted vaginal radical hysterectomy (LARVH).
    Marchiole P; Benchaib M; Buenerd A; Lazlo E; Dargent D; Mathevet P
    Gynecol Oncol; 2007 Jul; 106(1):132-41. PubMed ID: 17493666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Laparoscopically assisted radical vaginal hysterectomy vs. radical abdominal hysterectomy for cervical cancer: a match controlled study.
    Jackson KS; Das N; Naik R; Lopes AD; Godfrey KA; Hatem MH; Monaghan JM
    Gynecol Oncol; 2004 Dec; 95(3):655-61. PubMed ID: 15581978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of laparoscopic-assisted radical vaginal hysterectomy and laparoscopic radical hysterectomy in the treatment of cervical cancer.
    Choi CH; Lee JW; Lee YY; Kim HJ; Song T; Kim MK; Kim TJ; Kim BG; Bae DS
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2012 Nov; 19(12):3839-48. PubMed ID: 22644508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Does Vaginal Cuff Creation and Avoidance of a Uterine Manipulator Improve the Prognosis of Total Laparoscopic Radical Hysterectomy for Early Cervical Cancer? A Retrospective Multicenter Study.
    Kondo E; Yoshida K; Kubo-Kaneda M; Nii M; Okamoto K; Magawa S; Nimua R; Okumura A; Okugawa T; Yamawaki T; Nagao K; Yoshimura K; Watashige N; Yanoh K; Ikeda T
    Cancers (Basel); 2022 Sep; 14(18):. PubMed ID: 36139549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. An Australian, single-centre study of surgical management outcomes for early-stage cervical cancer.
    Weishaupt J; Saidi S; Carter J
    Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 2021 Feb; 61(1):123-127. PubMed ID: 33176013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A multicenter non-inferior randomized controlled study comparing the efficacy of laparoscopic versus abdominal radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer (stages IB1, IB2, and IIA1): study protocol of the LAUNCH 2 trial.
    Wu X; Qiu L; Lou W; Wang X; Zhu T; Zhang Y; Hu W; Xue X; Zhu Z; Xiang L; Li J; Fang X; Gao S; Feng H; Diao W; Zhang H; Du M; Bai Y; Hou Y; Yan W; Feng H; Yu H; Zhu S; Du Y; Jiang H
    Trials; 2022 Apr; 23(1):269. PubMed ID: 35395868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Laparo-assisted vaginal radical hysterectomy as a safe option for Minimal Invasive Surgery in early stage cervical cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Ronsini C; Köhler C; De Franciscis P; La Verde M; Mosca L; Solazzo MC; Colacurci N
    Gynecol Oncol; 2022 Jul; 166(1):188-195. PubMed ID: 35513934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Vaginal-assisted laparoscopic radical hysterectomy: rationale, technique, results.
    Gottschalk E; Lanowska M; Chiantera V; Marnitz S; Schneider A; Brink-Spalink V; Hasenbein K; Koehler C
    JSLS; 2011; 15(4):451-9. PubMed ID: 22643498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Robotics versus laparoscopic radical hysterectomy with lymphadenectomy in patients with early cervical cancer: a multicenter study.
    Tinelli R; Malzoni M; Cosentino F; Perone C; Fusco A; Cicinelli E; Nezhat F
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2011 Sep; 18(9):2622-8. PubMed ID: 21394663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Laparoscopic radical hysterectomy with transvaginal closure of vaginal cuff - a multicenter analysis.
    Kohler C; Hertel H; Herrmann J; Marnitz S; Mallmann P; Favero G; Plaikner A; Martus P; Gajda M; Schneider A
    Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2019 Jun; 29(5):845-850. PubMed ID: 31155516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of laparoscopic and open radical hysterectomy in cervical cancer patients with tumor size ≤2 cm.
    Chen X; Zhao N; Ye P; Chen J; Nan X; Zhao H; Zhou K; Zhang Y; Xue J; Zhou H; Shang H; Zhu H; Leanne VM; Yan X
    Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2020 May; 30(5):564-571. PubMed ID: 32276941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.