128 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38457577)
21. Laparotomic radical hysterectomy versus minimally invasive radical hysterectomy using vaginal colpotomy for the management of stage IB1 to IIA2 cervical cancer: Survival outcomes.
Yang EJ; Kim NR; Lee AJ; Shim SH; Lee SJ
Medicine (Baltimore); 2022 Feb; 101(8):e28911. PubMed ID: 35212297
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Oncological outcomes of laparoscopic radical hysterectomy versus radical abdominal hysterectomy in patients with early-stage cervical cancer: a multicenter analysis.
Rodriguez J; Rauh-Hain JA; Saenz J; Isla DO; Rendon Pereira GJ; Odetto D; Martinelli F; Villoslada V; Zapardiel I; Trujillo LM; Perez M; Hernandez M; Saadi JM; Raspagliesi F; Valdivia H; Siegrist J; Fu S; Hernandez Nava M; Echeverry L; Noll F; Ditto A; Lopez A; Hernandez A; Pareja R
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2021 Apr; 31(4):504-511. PubMed ID: 33504547
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Comparison of laparoscopic-assisted radical vaginal hysterectomy and abdominal radical hysterectomy in patients with early stage cervical cancer: A retrospective study.
Zhang S; Ma L; Meng QW; Zhou D; Moyiding T
Medicine (Baltimore); 2017 Sep; 96(36):e8005. PubMed ID: 28885364
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Robotic-Assisted Radical Hysterectomy Results in Better Surgical Outcomes Compared With the Traditional Laparoscopic Radical Hysterectomy for the Treatment of Cervical Cancer.
Nie JC; Yan AQ; Liu XS
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2017 Nov; 27(9):1990-1999. PubMed ID: 28858908
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Laparoscopically-assisted radical vaginal hysterectomy with five years follow-up: a case control study.
Yu JJ; Yang WX; Wang XM
Eur J Gynaecol Oncol; 2013; 34(2):156-8. PubMed ID: 23781588
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Surgical and oncological outcome of total laparoscopic radical hysterectomy in obese women with early-stage cervical cancer.
Moss EL; Balega J; Chan KK; Singh K
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2012 Jan; 22(1):101-6. PubMed ID: 22080890
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Total laparoscopic radical hysterectomy using Lee-Huang portal and McCartney transvaginal tube.
Lee CL; Huang KG
J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc; 2002 Nov; 9(4):536-40. PubMed ID: 12386369
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Laparoscopically Assisted Radical Vaginal Hysterectomy for Early-Stage Cervical Cancer: A Systemic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Zhang S; Wang S; Lv A; Huang S
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2016 Oct; 26(8):1497-502. PubMed ID: 27400320
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. A comparison of urinary complications following total laparoscopic radical hysterectomy and laparoscopic pelvic lymphadenectomy to open abdominal surgery.
Uccella S; Laterza R; Ciravolo G; Volpi E; Franchi M; Zefiro F; Donadello N; Ghezzi F
Gynecol Oncol; 2007 Oct; 107(1 Suppl 1):S147-9. PubMed ID: 17720232
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Comparison of laparoscopic versus open radical hysterectomy in patients with early-stage cervical cancer: a multicenter study in China.
Hu TWY; Huang Y; Li N; Nie D; Li Z
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2020 Aug; 30(8):1143-1150. PubMed ID: 32571892
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Is laparoscopically assisted radical vaginal hysterectomy for cervical carcinoma safe? A case control study with follow up.
Morgan DJ; Hunter DC; McCracken G; McClelland HR; Price JH; Dobbs SP
BJOG; 2007 May; 114(5):537-42. PubMed ID: 17355358
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Sexual, bladder and bowel function following different minimally invasive techniques of radical hysterectomy in patients with early-stage cervical cancer.
Baessler K; Windemut S; Chiantera V; Köhler C; Sehouli J
Clin Transl Oncol; 2021 Nov; 23(11):2335-2343. PubMed ID: 34003456
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Comparison of Robotic and laparoscopic Radical type-B and C hysterectomy for cervical cancer: Long term-outcomes.
Pellegrino A; Damiani GR; Loverro M; Pirovano C; Fachechi G; Corso S; Trojano G
Acta Biomed; 2017 Oct; 88(3):289-296. PubMed ID: 29083333
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Comparison of outcomes between abdominal, minimally invasive and combined vaginal-laparoscopic hysterectomy in patients with stage IAI/IA2 cervical cancer: 4C (Canadian Cervical Cancer Collaborative) study.
Piedimonte S; Pond GR; Plante M; Nelson G; Kwon J; Altman A; Feigenberg T; Elit L; Lau S; Sabourin J; Willows K; Aubrey C; Jang JH; Teo-Fortin LA; Cockburn N; Saunders NB; Shamiya S; Helpman L; Vicus D;
Gynecol Oncol; 2022 Aug; 166(2):230-235. PubMed ID: 35644731
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Laparoscopic nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy without uterine manipulator for cervical cancer stage IB: description of the technique, our experience and results after the era of LACC trial.
Kavallaris A; Chalvatzas N; Gkoutzioulis A; Zygouris D
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2021 Apr; 303(4):1039-1047. PubMed ID: 33068159
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Laparoscopically assisted radical vaginal hysterectomy (Coelio-Schauta): A comparison with open Wertheim/Meigs hysterectomy.
Sharma R; Bailey J; Anderson R; Murdoch J
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2006; 16(5):1927-32. PubMed ID: 17009993
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Total laparoscopic Wertheim's radical hysterectomy versus Wertheim's radical abdominal hysterectomy in the management of stage I cervical cancer in Singapore: a pilot study.
Lim YK; Chia YN; Yam KL
Singapore Med J; 2013 Dec; 54(12):683-8. PubMed ID: 24356754
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Laparoscopic versus open radical hysterectomy for stage IB2-IIB cervical cancer in the setting of neoadjuvant chemotherapy: a multi-institutional cohort study.
Ghezzi F; Cromi A; Ditto A; Vizza E; Malzoni M; Raspagliesi F; Uccella S; Corrado G; Cosentino F; Gotsch F; Martinelli F; Franchi M
Ann Surg Oncol; 2013 Jun; 20(6):2007-15. PubMed ID: 23224830
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Evaluation of Surgical Outcomes of Abdominal Radical Hysterectomy and Total Laparoscopic Radical Hysterectomy for Cervical Cancer: A Retrospective Analysis of Data Collected before the LACC Trial.
Pecorino B; D'Agate MG; Scibilia G; Scollo P; Giannini A; Di Donna MC; Chiantera V; Laganà AS
Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2022 Oct; 19(20):. PubMed ID: 36293758
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Robot versus laparoscopic nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer: a comparison of the intraoperative and perioperative results of a single surgeon's initial experience.
Chong GO; Lee YH; Hong DG; Cho YL; Park IS; Lee YS
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2013 Jul; 23(6):1145-9. PubMed ID: 23748178
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
