BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

128 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38457577)

  • 41. Effect of modified no-touch laparoscopic radical hysterectomy on outcomes of early stage cervical cancer: A retrospective cohort study.
    He F; Yuan S; Chen X; Zhang S; Han Y; Lin T; Xu B; Huang S; Pan Z
    Cancer Med; 2022 Jun; 11(11):2224-2232. PubMed ID: 35156771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Total laparoscopic radical hysterectomy for locally advanced cervical carcinoma (stages IIB, IIA and bulky stages IB) after concurrent chemoradiation therapy: surgical morbidity and oncological results.
    Colombo PE; Bertrand MM; Gutowski M; Mourregot A; Fabbro M; Saint-Aubert B; Quenet F; Gourgou S; Kerr C; Rouanet P
    Gynecol Oncol; 2009 Sep; 114(3):404-9. PubMed ID: 19555996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. [Comparative analysis of the prognosis of patients with locally advanced cervical cancer undergoing laparoscopic or abdominal surgery].
    Xu YP; Wang ZQ; Liang XD; Wang Y; Wang JL
    Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2020 Sep; 55(9):609-616. PubMed ID: 32957749
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Impact of laparoscopic radical hysterectomy on survival outcome in patients with FIGO stage IB cervical cancer: A matching study of two institutional hospitals in Korea.
    Kim SI; Lee M; Lee S; Suh DH; Kim HS; Kim K; Chung HH; No JH; Kim JW; Park NH; Song YS; Kim YB
    Gynecol Oncol; 2019 Oct; 155(1):75-82. PubMed ID: 31383569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. The MEMORY Study: MulticentEr study of Minimally invasive surgery versus Open Radical hYsterectomy in the management of early-stage cervical cancer: Survival outcomes.
    Leitao MM; Zhou QC; Brandt B; Iasonos A; Sioulas V; Lavigne Mager K; Shahin M; Bruce S; Black DR; Kay CG; Gandhi M; Qayyum M; Scalici J; Jones NL; Paladugu R; Brown J; Naumann RW; Levine MD; Mendivil A; Lim PC; Kang E; Cantrell LA; Sullivan MW; Martino MA; Kratz MK; Kolev V; Tomita S; Leath CA; Boitano TKL; Doo DW; Feltmate C; Sugrue R; Olawaiye AB; Goldfeld E; Ferguson SE; Suhner J; Abu-Rustum NR
    Gynecol Oncol; 2022 Sep; 166(3):417-424. PubMed ID: 35879128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. A comparison of stages IB1 and IB2 cervical cancers treated with radical hysterectomy. Is size the real difference?
    Rutledge TL; Kamelle SA; Tillmanns TD; Gould NS; Wright JD; Cohn DE; Herzog TJ; Rader JS; Gold MA; Johnson GA; Walker JL; Mannel RS; McMeekin DS
    Gynecol Oncol; 2004 Oct; 95(1):70-6. PubMed ID: 15385112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Retrospective Analysis of Cervical Cancer Treatment Outcomes: Ten Years of Experience with the Vaginal Assisted Radical Laparoscopic Hysterectomy VARLH.
    Wojdat R; Malanowska E
    Biomed Res Int; 2022; 2022():5163886. PubMed ID: 35047636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Effect of laparoscopic-assisted transvaginal hysterectomy on wound complications in patients with early stage cervical cancer: A meta-analysis.
    Zhang J; Zhou Y; Ye H; Chen C; Luo Y
    Int Wound J; 2024 Apr; 21(4):e14529. PubMed ID: 38069545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. [Long-term oncological outcomes after laparoscopic versus abdominal radical hysterectomy in stage I a2- II a2 cervical cancer: a matched cohort study].
    Wang W; Shang C; Huang J; Chen S; Shen H; Yao S
    Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2015 Dec; 50(12):894-901. PubMed ID: 26887872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Open versus minimally invasive radical hysterectomy for early cervical cancer: A two-center retrospective cohort study with pathologic review of usual-type adenocarcinoma and adenosquamous carcinoma.
    Kim Y; Kim SI; Kim H; Lee M; Kim HS; Kim K; Chung HH; No JH; Kim YB; Kim JW; Park NH; Song YS; Lee C; Suh DH
    Gynecol Oncol; 2022 Oct; 167(1):28-36. PubMed ID: 35970602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Comparison of survival outcomes between laparoscopic surgery and abdominal surgery for radical hysterectomy as primary treatment in patients with stage IB2/IIA2 cervical cancer.
    Chen C; Guo J; Liu P; Li Z; Jiang H; Zhu Q; Bin X; Lang J
    J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2021 Apr; 47(4):1516-1526. PubMed ID: 33527615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Total laparoscopic radical hysterectomy versus abdominal radical hysterectomy with lymphadenectomy in patients with early cervical cancer: our experience.
    Malzoni M; Tinelli R; Cosentino F; Fusco A; Malzoni C
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2009 May; 16(5):1316-23. PubMed ID: 19224286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. A case-controlled study of total laparoscopic radical hysterectomy with pelvic lymphadenectomy versus radical abdominal hysterectomy in a fellowship training program.
    Zakashansky K; Chuang L; Gretz H; Nagarsheth NP; Rahaman J; Nezhat FR
    Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2007; 17(5):1075-82. PubMed ID: 17386041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Comparison of laparoscopic and abdominal radical hysterectomy for early stage cervical cancer: oncologic outcomes based on tumor diameter.
    He J; Hao M; Liu P; Liu Z; Lang J; Bin X; Chen C
    Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2020 Sep; 30(9):1308-1316. PubMed ID: 32699022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Laparoscopic-assisted radical vaginal hysterectomy (LARVH): prospective evaluation of 200 patients with cervical cancer.
    Hertel H; Köhler C; Michels W; Possover M; Tozzi R; Schneider A
    Gynecol Oncol; 2003 Sep; 90(3):505-11. PubMed ID: 13678717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. [Impact on survival and quality of life of laparoscopic radical hysterectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy to patients with early-stage cervical cancer].
    Yang ZJ; Chen YL; Yao DS; Zhang JQ; Li F; Li L
    Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2011 Nov; 46(11):854-9. PubMed ID: 22333237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Comparison of laparoscopic and abdominal radical hysterectomy in early stage cervical cancer patients without adjuvant treatment: Ancillary analysis of a Korean Gynecologic Oncology Group Study (KGOG 1028).
    Paik ES; Lim MC; Kim MH; Kim YH; Song ES; Seong SJ; Suh DH; Lee JM; Lee C; Choi CH
    Gynecol Oncol; 2019 Sep; 154(3):547-553. PubMed ID: 31272738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Comparison of survival and adverse events between women with stage IB1 and stage IB2 cervical cancer treated by laparoscopic radical vaginal hysterectomy.
    Hong JH; Choi JS; Lee JH; Son CE; Jeon SW; Bae JW; Eom JM
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2012 Feb; 19(2):605-11. PubMed ID: 21769469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Hysterectomy with radiotherapy or chemotherapy or both for women with locally advanced cervical cancer.
    Kokka F; Bryant A; Brockbank E; Powell M; Oram D
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2015 Apr; (4):CD010260. PubMed ID: 25847525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. [The place of laparoscopic-assisted radical vaginal hysterectomy in surgical treatment of cervical cancer].
    Gorchev G; Tomov S
    Akush Ginekol (Sofiia); 2005; 44(1):3-7. PubMed ID: 15853003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.