These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

222 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38457789)

  • 1. Are there differences in the reoperation rates for operative adjacent-segment disease between ALIF+PS, PLIF+PS, TLIF+PS, and LLIF+PS? An analysis of a cohort of 5291 patients.
    Bains RR; Royse KE; Fennessy J; Norheim EP; Tabaraee E; Harris JE; Kuo CC; Guppy KH
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2024 Jun; 40(6):733-740. PubMed ID: 38457789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Single-Level Anterolateral and Posterior Interbody Fusion Techniques are Associated With Equivalent Long-Term Lumbar Reoperations.
    Narendran N; Nilssen PK; Skaggs DL; Kim SD; Perry TG; Mikhail CM; Tuchman A
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2024 Sep; 49(17):1241-1247. PubMed ID: 38093607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The impact of interbody approach and lumbar level on segmental, adjacent, and sagittal alignment in degenerative lumbar pathology: a radiographic analysis six months following surgery.
    O'Connor B; Drolet CE; Leveque JA; Nemani V; Krause KL; Dorsi M; Schroerlucke S; Shen J; Louie PK
    Spine J; 2022 Aug; 22(8):1318-1324. PubMed ID: 35351666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. PLF+PS or ALIF+PS: which has a lower operative nonunion rate? Analysis of a cohort of 2,061 patients from a National Spine Registry.
    Norheim EP; Royse KE; Brara HS; Moller DJ; Suen PW; Rahman SU; Harris JE; Guppy KH
    Spine J; 2021 Jul; 21(7):1118-1125. PubMed ID: 33640585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Posterior lumbar interbody fusion with cortical bone trajectory screw fixation versus posterior lumbar interbody fusion using traditional pedicle screw fixation for degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis: a comparative study.
    Sakaura H; Miwa T; Yamashita T; Kuroda Y; Ohwada T
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2016 Nov; 25(5):591-595. PubMed ID: 27231813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Approach-based Comparative and Predictor Analysis of 30-day Readmission, Reoperation, and Morbidity in Patients Undergoing Lumbar Interbody Fusion Using the ACS-NSQIP Dataset.
    Katz AD; Mancini N; Karukonda T; Greenwood M; Cote M; Moss IL
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2019 Mar; 44(6):432-441. PubMed ID: 30138253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Impact of lumbar interbody fusion surgery on postoperative outcomes in patients with recurrent lumbar disc herniation: Analysis of the US national inpatient sample.
    Ye YP; Hu JW; Zhang YG; Xu H
    J Clin Neurosci; 2019 Dec; 70():20-26. PubMed ID: 31630917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Does the use of preoperative bisphosphonates in patients with osteopenia and osteoporosis affect lumbar fusion rates? Analysis from a national spine registry.
    Guppy KH; Chan PH; Prentice HA; Norheim EP; Harris JE; Brara HS
    Neurosurg Focus; 2020 Aug; 49(2):E12. PubMed ID: 32738794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Lateral lumbar interbody fusion in revision surgery for restenosis after posterior decompression.
    Kudo Y; Okano I; Toyone T; Matsuoka A; Maruyama H; Yamamura R; Ishikawa K; Hayakawa C; Tani S; Sekimizu M; Hoshino Y; Ozawa T; Shirahata T; Fujita M; Oshita Y; Emori H; Omata H; Inagaki K
    Neurosurg Focus; 2020 Sep; 49(3):E11. PubMed ID: 32871574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Early cephalad adjacent segment degeneration after posterior lumbar interbody fusion: a comparative study between cortical bone trajectory screw fixation and traditional trajectory screw fixation.
    Sakaura H; Ikegami D; Fujimori T; Sugiura T; Mukai Y; Hosono N; Fuji T
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2020 Feb; 32(2):155-159. PubMed ID: 31628292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Longitudinal Trends of Patient Demographics and Morbidity of Different Approaches in Lumbar Interbody Fusion: An Analysis Using the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Database.
    Oezel L; Okano I; Hughes AP; Sarin M; Shue J; Sama AA; Cammisa FP; Girardi FP; Soffin EM
    World Neurosurg; 2022 Aug; 164():e183-e193. PubMed ID: 35472646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Minimally invasive LLIF surgery to decrease the occurrence of adjacent-segment disease compared to conventional open TLIF.
    Otsuki B; Fujibayashi S; Shimizu T; Murata K; Masuda S; Matsuda S
    Eur Spine J; 2023 Sep; 32(9):3200-3209. PubMed ID: 37314580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Adjacent segment degeneration after lumbosacral fusion in spondylolisthesis: a retrospective radiological and clinical analysis].
    Zencica P; Chaloupka R; Hladíková J; Krbec M
    Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2010 Apr; 77(2):124-30. PubMed ID: 20447355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Primary anterior lumbar interbody fusion, with and without posterior instrumentation: a 1,377-patient cohort from a multicenter spine registry.
    Laiwalla AN; Chang RN; Harary M; Salek SA; Richards HG; Brara HS; Hirt D; Harris JE; Terterov S; Tabaraee E; Rahman SU
    Spine J; 2024 Mar; 24(3):496-505. PubMed ID: 37875244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Minimally invasive lateral interbody fusion for the treatment of rostral adjacent-segment lumbar degenerative stenosis without supplemental pedicle screw fixation.
    Wang MY; Vasudevan R; Mindea SA
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2014 Dec; 21(6):861-6. PubMed ID: 25303619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Time Course Observation of Outcomes between Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion and Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion.
    Lin GX; Park CK; Hur JW; Kim JS
    Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo); 2019 Jun; 59(6):222-230. PubMed ID: 31068542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Functional and radiological outcome of anterior retroperitoneal versus posterior transforaminal interbody fusion in the management of single-level lumbar degenerative disease.
    Bassani R; Morselli C; Querenghi AM; Nuara A; Sconfienza LM; Peretti GM
    Neurosurg Focus; 2020 Sep; 49(3):E2. PubMed ID: 32871567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Which Approach Is Advantageous to Preventing Development of Adjacent Segment Disease? Comparative Analysis of 3 Different Lumbar Interbody Fusion Techniques (ALIF, LLIF, and PLIF) in L4-5 Spondylolisthesis.
    Lee CW; Yoon KJ; Ha SS
    World Neurosurg; 2017 Sep; 105():612-622. PubMed ID: 28602928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of pedicle screw-based dynamic stabilization and fusion surgery in the treatment of radiographic adjacent-segment degeneration: a retrospective analysis of single L5-S1 degenerative spondylosis covering 4 years.
    Han Y; Sun J; Luo C; Huang S; Li L; Ji X; Duan X; Wang Z; Pi G
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2016 Dec; 25(6):706-712. PubMed ID: 27341057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Radiological adjacent-segment degeneration in L4-5 spondylolisthesis: comparison between dynamic stabilization and minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion.
    Kuo CH; Huang WC; Wu JC; Tu TH; Fay LY; Wu CL; Cheng H
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2018 Sep; 29(3):250-258. PubMed ID: 29856306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.