These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

144 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38458769)

  • 1. Validation of 2D flow MRI for helical and vortical flows.
    Mehmood Z; Assadi H; Grafton-Clarke C; Li R; Matthews G; Alabed S; Girling R; Underwood V; Kasmai B; Zhao X; Ricci F; Zhong L; Aung N; Petersen SE; Swift AJ; Vassiliou VS; Cavalcante J; Geest RJV; Garg P
    Open Heart; 2024 Mar; 11(1):. PubMed ID: 38458769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Clinical assessment of aortic valve stenosis: Comparison between 4D flow MRI and transthoracic echocardiography.
    Adriaans BP; Westenberg JJM; van Cauteren YJM; Gerretsen S; Elbaz MSM; Bekkers SCAM; Veenstra LF; Crijns HJGM; Wildberger JE; Schalla S
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2020 Feb; 51(2):472-480. PubMed ID: 31257647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Four-dimensional Virtual Catheter: Noninvasive Assessment of Intra-aortic Hemodynamics in Bicuspid Aortic Valve Disease.
    Elbaz MSM; Scott MB; Barker AJ; McCarthy P; Malaisrie C; Collins JD; Bonow RO; Carr J; Markl M
    Radiology; 2019 Dec; 293(3):541-550. PubMed ID: 31592729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comprehensive Neonatal Cardiac, Feed and Wrap, Non-contrast, Non-sedated, Free-breathing Compressed Sensing 4D Flow MRI Assessment.
    Panayiotou HR; Mills LK; Broadbent DA; Shelley D; Scheffczik J; Olaru AM; Jin N; Greenwood JP; Michael H; Plein S; Bissell MM
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2023 Mar; 57(3):789-799. PubMed ID: 35792484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. 4D Flow
    Hautanen S; Kiljander T; Korpela T; Saari P; Kokkonen J; Mustonen P; Sillanmäki S; Ylä-Herttuala E; Husso M; Hedman M; Kauhanen P
    In Vivo; 2023; 37(1):88-98. PubMed ID: 36593031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Quantitative Analysis of Vortical Blood Flow in the Thoracic Aorta Using 4D Phase Contrast MRI.
    von Spiczak J; Crelier G; Giese D; Kozerke S; Maintz D; Bunck AC
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(9):e0139025. PubMed ID: 26418327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A new imaging method for assessment of aortic dissection using four-dimensional phase contrast magnetic resonance imaging.
    Clough RE; Waltham M; Giese D; Taylor PR; Schaeffter T
    J Vasc Surg; 2012 Apr; 55(4):914-23. PubMed ID: 22386146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Aortic flow patterns and wall shear stress maps by 4D-flow cardiovascular magnetic resonance in the assessment of aortic dilatation in bicuspid aortic valve disease.
    Rodríguez-Palomares JF; Dux-Santoy L; Guala A; Kale R; Maldonado G; Teixidó-Turà G; Galian L; Huguet M; Valente F; Gutiérrez L; González-Alujas T; Johnson KM; Wieben O; García-Dorado D; Evangelista A
    J Cardiovasc Magn Reson; 2018 Apr; 20(1):28. PubMed ID: 29695249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Machine learning for the automatic assessment of aortic rotational flow and wall shear stress from 4D flow cardiac magnetic resonance imaging.
    Garrido-Oliver J; Aviles J; Córdova MM; Dux-Santoy L; Ruiz-Muñoz A; Teixido-Tura G; Maso Talou GD; Morales Ferez X; Jiménez G; Evangelista A; Ferreira-González I; Rodriguez-Palomares J; Camara O; Guala A
    Eur Radiol; 2022 Oct; 32(10):7117-7127. PubMed ID: 35976395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Aortic flow is abnormal in HFpEF.
    Mehmood Z; Assadi H; Li R; Kasmai B; Matthews G; Grafton-Clarke C; Sanz-Cepero A; Zhao X; Zhong L; Aung N; Skinner K; Hadinnapola C; Swoboda P; Swift AJ; Vassiliou VS; Miller C; van der Geest RJ; Peterson S; Garg P
    Wellcome Open Res; 2023; 8():577. PubMed ID: 38495400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Validation of aortic valve 4D flow analysis and myocardial deformation by cardiovascular magnetic resonance in patients after the arterial switch operation.
    van Wijk WHS; Breur JMPJ; Westenberg JJM; Driessen MMP; Meijboom FJ; Driesen B; de Baat EC; Doevendans PAFM; Leiner T; Grotenhuis HB
    J Cardiovasc Magn Reson; 2019 Mar; 21(1):20. PubMed ID: 30879465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Flow evaluation software for four-dimensional flow MRI: a reliability and validation study.
    Burkhardt BEU; Kellenberger CJ; Callaghan FM; Valsangiacomo Buechel ER; Geiger J
    Radiol Med; 2023 Oct; 128(10):1225-1235. PubMed ID: 37620674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Aortic dilatation associates with flow displacement and increased circumferential wall shear stress in patients without aortic stenosis: A prospective clinical study.
    Kauhanen SP; Hedman M; Kariniemi E; Jaakkola P; Vanninen R; Saari P; Liimatainen T
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2019 Jul; 50(1):136-145. PubMed ID: 30659686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Peak flow measurements in patients with severe aortic stenosis: a prospective comparative study between cardiovascular magnetic resonance 2D and 4D flow and transthoracic echocardiography.
    Hälvä R; Vaara SM; Peltonen JI; Kaasalainen TT; Holmström M; Lommi J; Suihko S; Rajala H; Kylmälä M; Kivistö S; Syväranta S
    J Cardiovasc Magn Reson; 2021 Nov; 23(1):132. PubMed ID: 34775954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Blood flow characteristics in the ascending aorta after aortic valve replacement--a pilot study using 4D-flow MRI.
    von Knobelsdorff-Brenkenhoff F; Trauzeddel RF; Barker AJ; Gruettner H; Markl M; Schulz-Menger J
    Int J Cardiol; 2014 Jan; 170(3):426-33. PubMed ID: 24315151
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Aortic flow is associated with aging and exercise capacity.
    Zhao X; Garg P; Assadi H; Tan RS; Chai P; Yeo TJ; Matthews G; Mehmood Z; Leng S; Bryant JA; Teo LLS; Ong CC; Yip JW; Tan JL; van der Geest RJ; Zhong L
    Eur Heart J Open; 2023 Jul; 3(4):oead079. PubMed ID: 37635784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of fast acquisition strategies in whole-heart four-dimensional flow cardiac MR: Two-center, 1.5 Tesla, phantom and in vivo validation study.
    Garg P; Westenberg JJM; van den Boogaard PJ; Swoboda PP; Aziz R; Foley JRJ; Fent GJ; Tyl FGJ; Coratella L; ElBaz MSM; van der Geest RJ; Higgins DM; Greenwood JP; Plein S
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2018 Jan; 47(1):272-281. PubMed ID: 28470915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Evaluation of aortic stenosis severity using 4D flow jet shear layer detection for the measurement of valve effective orifice area.
    Garcia J; Markl M; Schnell S; Allen B; Entezari P; Mahadevia R; Chris Malaisrie S; Pibarot P; Carr J; Barker AJ
    Magn Reson Imaging; 2014 Sep; 32(7):891-8. PubMed ID: 24865143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of 4D flow and 2D velocity-encoded phase contrast MRI sequences for the evaluation of aortic hemodynamics.
    Bollache E; van Ooij P; Powell A; Carr J; Markl M; Barker AJ
    Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2016 Oct; 32(10):1529-41. PubMed ID: 27435230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Evaluating a Phase-Specific Approach to Aortic Flow: A 4D Flow MRI Study.
    Ramaekers MJFG; Westenberg JJM; Venner MFGHM; Juffermans JF; van Assen HC; Te Kiefte BJC; Adriaans BP; Lamb HJ; Wildberger JE; Schalla S
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2024 Mar; 59(3):1056-1067. PubMed ID: 37309838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.