BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

124 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38458956)

  • 1. Complementing Braden scale for pressure ulcer risk with clinical and demographic-related factors in a large cohort of hospitalized Italian patients.
    Giovannoni L; Longobucco Y; Iovino P; Barbetti C; Becattini S; Bonanni D; Cordelli F; Cosci M; Del Perugia C; Flego R; Giannuzzi D; Guasti B; Iannone SR; Latini R; Macchitella C; Piccardi F; Prisco E; Pucci T; Tricca M; Rasero L
    J Tissue Viability; 2024 May; 33(2):243-247. PubMed ID: 38458956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Pressure Ulcer Risk in the Incontinent Patient: Analysis of Incontinence and Hospital-Acquired Pressure Ulcers From the International Pressure Ulcer Prevalence™ Survey.
    Lachenbruch C; Ribble D; Emmons K; VanGilder C
    J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs; 2016; 43(3):235-41. PubMed ID: 27167317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Predicting pressure ulcer risk in pediatric patients: the Braden Q Scale.
    Curley MA; Razmus IS; Roberts KE; Wypij D
    Nurs Res; 2003; 52(1):22-33. PubMed ID: 12552172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Predicting pressure ulcer risk with the modified Braden, Braden, and Norton scales in acute care hospitals in Mainland China.
    Kwong E; Pang S; Wong T; Ho J; Shao-ling X; Li-jun T
    Appl Nurs Res; 2005 May; 18(2):122-8. PubMed ID: 15991112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Supplementing the Braden scale for pressure ulcer risk among medical inpatients: the contribution of self-reported symptoms and standard laboratory tests.
    Skogestad IJ; Martinsen L; Børsting TE; Granheim TI; Ludvigsen ES; Gay CL; Lerdal A
    J Clin Nurs; 2017 Jan; 26(1-2):202-214. PubMed ID: 27322501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Predictive validity of the Braden scale for patients in intensive care units.
    Hyun S; Vermillion B; Newton C; Fall M; Li X; Kaewprag P; Moffatt-Bruce S; Lenz ER
    Am J Crit Care; 2013 Nov; 22(6):514-20. PubMed ID: 24186823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Prevalence of pressure ulcer and associated risk factors in middle- and older-aged medical inpatients in Norway.
    Børsting TE; Tvedt CR; Skogestad IJ; Granheim TI; Gay CL; Lerdal A
    J Clin Nurs; 2018 Feb; 27(3-4):e535-e543. PubMed ID: 28960642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Assessing predictive validity of the modified Braden scale for prediction of pressure ulcer risk of orthopaedic patients in an acute care setting.
    Chan WS; Pang SM; Kwong EW
    J Clin Nurs; 2009 Jun; 18(11):1565-73. PubMed ID: 19490294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A Meta-analysis to Evaluate the Predictive Validity of the Braden Scale for Pressure Ulcer Risk Assessment in Long-term Care.
    Chen HL; Shen WQ; Liu P
    Ostomy Wound Manage; 2016 Sep; 62(9):20-8. PubMed ID: 27668477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The Challenge of Predicting Pressure Ulcers in Critically Ill Patients. A Multicenter Cohort Study.
    Ranzani OT; Simpson ES; Japiassú AM; Noritomi DT;
    Ann Am Thorac Soc; 2016 Oct; 13(10):1775-1783. PubMed ID: 27463839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Validity of pressure ulcer risk assessment scales; Cubbin and Jackson, Braden, and Douglas scale.
    Jun Seongsook RN; Jeong Ihnsook RN; Lee Younghee RN
    Int J Nurs Stud; 2004 Feb; 41(2):199-204. PubMed ID: 14725784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Incidence of pressure ulcers in a neurologic intensive care unit.
    Fife C; Otto G; Capsuto EG; Brandt K; Lyssy K; Murphy K; Short C
    Crit Care Med; 2001 Feb; 29(2):283-90. PubMed ID: 11246307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. All at-risk patients are not created equal: analysis of Braden pressure ulcer risk scores to identify specific risks.
    Tescher AN; Branda ME; Byrne TJ; Naessens JM
    J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs; 2012; 39(3):282-91. PubMed ID: 22552104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Investigation of the prevalence of pressure ulcers and patient-related risk factors in hospitals in the province of Erzurum: A cross-sectional study.
    Kaşıkçı M; Aksoy M; Ay E
    J Tissue Viability; 2018 Aug; 27(3):135-140. PubMed ID: 29776817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Concordance of Shape Risk Scale, a new pressure ulcer risk tool, with Braden Scale.
    Soppi ET; Iivanainen AK; Korhonen PA
    Int Wound J; 2014 Dec; 11(6):611-5. PubMed ID: 24751183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Predictive Value of Braden Risk Factors in Pressure Ulcers of Outpatients With Spinal Cord Injury.
    Sadeghi Fazel F; Derakhshanrad N; Yekaninejad MS; Vosoughi F; Derakhshanrad A; Saberi H
    Acta Med Iran; 2018 Jan; 56(1):56-61. PubMed ID: 29436796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Pressure ulcer risk assessment in critical care: interrater reliability and validity studies of the Braden and Waterlow scales and subjective ratings in two intensive care units.
    Kottner J; Dassen T
    Int J Nurs Stud; 2010 Jun; 47(6):671-7. PubMed ID: 20003975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Pressure ulcer incidence and Braden subscales: Retrospective cohort analysis in general wards of a Portuguese hospital.
    Sardo PMG; Guedes JAD; Alvarelhão JJM; Machado PAP; Melo EMOP
    J Tissue Viability; 2018 May; 27(2):95-100. PubMed ID: 29398293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Munro Pressure Ulcer Risk Assessment Scale in Adult Patients Undergoing General Anesthesia in the Operating Room.
    Lei L; Zhou T; Xu X; Wang L
    J Healthc Eng; 2022; 2022():4157803. PubMed ID: 35356613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Predictive validity of the Braden Scale for Pressure Ulcer Risk in elderly residents of long-term care facilities.
    de Souza DM; Santos VL; Iri HK; Sadasue Oguri MY
    Geriatr Nurs; 2010; 31(2):95-104. PubMed ID: 20381710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.