124 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38458956)
61. Braden Scale in pressure ulcer risk assessment.
Jansen RCS; Silva KBA; Moura MES
Rev Bras Enferm; 2020; 73(6):e20190413. PubMed ID: 32785503
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
62. Prevalence, risk factors and prevention of pressure ulcers in Dutch intensive care units. Results of a cross-sectional survey.
Bours GJ; De Laat E; Halfens RJ; Lubbers M
Intensive Care Med; 2001 Oct; 27(10):1599-605. PubMed ID: 11685300
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
63. Pilot study compares scores of the Resident Assessment Instrument Minimum Data Set Version 2.0 (MDS 2.0) Pressure Ulcer Risk Scale with the Braden Pressure Ulcer Risk assessment for patients in complex continuing care.
Carreau L; Niezgoda H; Trainor A; Parent M; Woodbury MG
Adv Skin Wound Care; 2015 Jan; 28(1):28-33. PubMed ID: 25502973
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
64. Predicting Pressure Ulcer Development in Clinical Practice: Evaluation of Braden Scale Scores and Nutrition Parameters.
Miller N; Frankenfield D; Lehman E; Maguire M; Schirm V
J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs; 2016; 43(2):133-9. PubMed ID: 26680628
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
65. Using the Braden and Glasgow scales to predict pressure ulcer risk in patients hospitalized at intensive care units.
Fernandes LM; Caliri MH
Rev Lat Am Enfermagem; 2008; 16(6):973-8. PubMed ID: 19229399
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
66. Predicting pressure ulcer risk: a multisite study of the predictive validity of the Braden Scale.
Bergstrom N; Braden B; Kemp M; Champagne M; Ruby E
Nurs Res; 1998; 47(5):261-9. PubMed ID: 9766454
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
67. Enhancing Braden pressure ulcer risk assessment in acutely ill adult veterans.
Cowan LJ; Stechmiller JK; Rowe M; Kairalla JA
Wound Repair Regen; 2012; 20(2):137-48. PubMed ID: 22304370
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
68. Relationship between Braden scale score and pressure ulcer development in patients admitted in trauma intensive care unit.
Iranmanesh S; Rafiei H; Sabzevari S
Int Wound J; 2012 Jun; 9(3):248-52. PubMed ID: 21910830
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
69. [Risk assessment scale for pressure ulcers in pediatric patients: French translation, internal consistency, convergent validity, feasibility, and clinical utility of the Braden QD Scale].
Verdon M; Rae AC; Palleron C; Roulin MJ
Rech Soins Infirm; 2022; 149(2):51-61. PubMed ID: 36241454
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
70. The frequency of pressure injury in level 3 intensive care units and determination of risk factors: A cross-sectional study.
Akpolat R; Sisman H; Alptekin D
J Tissue Viability; 2024 May; 33(2):248-253. PubMed ID: 38493047
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
71. The Braden Scale cannot be used alone for assessing pressure ulcer risk in surgical patients: a meta-analysis.
He W; Liu P; Chen HL
Ostomy Wound Manage; 2012 Feb; 58(2):34-40. PubMed ID: 22316631
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
72. The 2003 national pediatric pressure ulcer and skin breakdown prevalence survey: a multisite study.
McLane KM; Bookout K; McCord S; McCain J; Jefferson LS
J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs; 2004; 31(4):168-78. PubMed ID: 15851858
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
73. Pressure injuries in surgical patients: a comparison of Norton, Braden and Waterlow risk assessment scales.
Gurkan A; Kirtil I; Aydin YD; Kutuk G
J Wound Care; 2022 Feb; 31(2):170-177. PubMed ID: 35148625
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
74. [Development and Evaluation of Electronic Health Record Data-Driven Predictive Models for Pressure Ulcers].
Park SK; Park HA; Hwang H
J Korean Acad Nurs; 2019 Oct; 49(5):575-585. PubMed ID: 31672951
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
75. Screening for pressure ulcer risk in an acute care hospital: development of a brief bedside scale.
Perneger TV; Raë AC; Gaspoz JM; Borst F; Vitek O; Héliot C
J Clin Epidemiol; 2002 May; 55(5):498-504. PubMed ID: 12007553
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
76. Patient-specific and surgical characteristics in the development of pressure ulcers.
Tschannen D; Bates O; Talsma A; Guo Y
Am J Crit Care; 2012 Mar; 21(2):116-25. PubMed ID: 22381988
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
77. Sensitivity and specificity of the Braden Scale in the cardiac surgical population.
Lewicki LJ; Mion LC; Secic M
J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs; 2000 Jan; 27(1):36-41. PubMed ID: 10649141
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
78. [A cross-sectional study on the prevalence and incidence of pressure ulcers in an Italian University Hospital-Umbria Region].
Mitello L; Salvatore S; Falchetti Ballerani V; Bianco MA; Perugini D; Sabatini P; Luciani CP; Latina R
Prof Inferm; 2020; 73(1):33-41. PubMed ID: 32594677
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
79. [Prediction of the pressure ulcer development in elderly women using the Braden scale].
Blümel JE; Tirado K; Schiele C; Schönffeldt G; Sarrá S
Rev Med Chil; 2004 May; 132(5):595-600. PubMed ID: 15279146
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
80. Risk assessment scales for pressure ulcer prevention: a systematic review.
Pancorbo-Hidalgo PL; Garcia-Fernandez FP; Lopez-Medina IM; Alvarez-Nieto C
J Adv Nurs; 2006 Apr; 54(1):94-110. PubMed ID: 16553695
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
