These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

171 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38459100)

  • 21. Prostate Cancer Detection Percentages of Repeat Biopsy in Patients with Positive Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging (Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System/Likert 3-5) and Negative Initial Biopsy. A Mini Systematic Review.
    Grivas N; Lardas M; Espinós EL; Lam TB; Rouviere O; Mottet N; van den Bergh RCN;
    Eur Urol; 2022 Nov; 82(5):452-457. PubMed ID: 35985901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Clinical performance of magnetic resonance imaging and biomarkers for prostate cancer diagnosis in men at high genetic risk.
    Cussenot O; Renard-Penna R; Montagne S; Ondet V; Pilon A; Guechot J; Comperat E; Hamdy F; Lamb A; Cancel-Tassin G
    BJU Int; 2023 Jun; 131(6):745-754. PubMed ID: 36648168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Prostate cancer detection on transrectal ultrasonography-guided random biopsy despite negative real-time magnetic resonance imaging/ultrasonography fusion-guided targeted biopsy: reasons for targeted biopsy failure.
    Cash H; Günzel K; Maxeiner A; Stephan C; Fischer T; Durmus T; Miller K; Asbach P; Haas M; Kempkensteffen C
    BJU Int; 2016 Jul; 118(1):35-43. PubMed ID: 26384851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Risk-based Patient Selection for Magnetic Resonance Imaging-targeted Prostate Biopsy after Negative Transrectal Ultrasound-guided Random Biopsy Avoids Unnecessary Magnetic Resonance Imaging Scans.
    Alberts AR; Schoots IG; Bokhorst LP; van Leenders GJ; Bangma CH; Roobol MJ
    Eur Urol; 2016 Jun; 69(6):1129-34. PubMed ID: 26651990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. The FUTURE Trial: A Multicenter Randomised Controlled Trial on Target Biopsy Techniques Based on Magnetic Resonance Imaging in the Diagnosis of Prostate Cancer in Patients with Prior Negative Biopsies.
    Wegelin O; Exterkate L; van der Leest M; Kummer JA; Vreuls W; de Bruin PC; Bosch JLHR; Barentsz JO; Somford DM; van Melick HHE
    Eur Urol; 2019 Apr; 75(4):582-590. PubMed ID: 30522912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. How to implement magnetic resonance imaging before prostate biopsy in clinical practice: nomograms for saving biopsies.
    Borque-Fernando Á; Esteban LM; Celma A; Roche S; Planas J; Regis L; de Torres I; Semidey ME; Trilla E; Morote J
    World J Urol; 2020 Jun; 38(6):1481-1491. PubMed ID: 31506748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Negative multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging for prostate cancer: further outcome and consequences.
    Haack M; Miksch V; Tian Z; Duwe G; Thomas A; Borkowetz A; Stroh K; Thomas C; Haferkamp A; Höfner T; Boehm K
    World J Urol; 2022 Dec; 40(12):2947-2954. PubMed ID: 36318314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. T1 Mapping of the Prostate Using Single-Shot T1FLASH: A Clinical Feasibility Study to Optimize Prostate Cancer Assessment.
    Al-Bourini O; Seif Amir Hosseini A; Giganti F; Balz J; Heitz LG; Voit D; Lotz J; Trojan L; Frahm J; Uhlig A; Uhlig J
    Invest Radiol; 2023 Jun; 58(6):380-387. PubMed ID: 36729865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Transperineal Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Ultrasound Fusion Targeted Prostate Biopsy Combined with Standard Template Improves Prostate Cancer Detection.
    Kim MM; Wu S; Lin SX; Crotty RK; Harisinghani M; Feldman AS; Wu CL; Dahl DM
    J Urol; 2022 Jan; 207(1):86-94. PubMed ID: 34428921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Avoiding Unnecessary Biopsy after Multiparametric Prostate MRI with VERDICT Analysis: The INNOVATE Study.
    Singh S; Rogers H; Kanber B; Clemente J; Pye H; Johnston EW; Parry T; Grey A; Dinneen E; Shaw G; Heavey S; Stopka-Farooqui U; Haider A; Freeman A; Giganti F; Atkinson D; Moore CM; Whitaker HC; Alexander DC; Panagiotaki E; Punwani S
    Radiology; 2022 Dec; 305(3):623-630. PubMed ID: 35916679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Performance of Multiparametric MRI of the Prostate in Biopsy Naïve Men: A Meta-analysis of Prospective Studies.
    Becerra MF; Alameddine M; Zucker I; Tamariz L; Palacio A; Nemeth Z; Velasquez MC; Savio LF; Panizzutti M; Jue JS; Soodana-Prakash N; Ritch CR; Gonzalgo ML; Parekh DJ; Punnen S
    Urology; 2020 Dec; 146():189-195. PubMed ID: 32890616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Artificial Intelligence in Magnetic Resonance Imaging-based Prostate Cancer Diagnosis: Where Do We Stand in 2021?
    Suarez-Ibarrola R; Sigle A; Eklund M; Eberli D; Miernik A; Benndorf M; Bamberg F; Gratzke C
    Eur Urol Focus; 2022 Mar; 8(2):409-417. PubMed ID: 33773964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Diagnostic accuracy of
    Scheltema MJ; Chang JI; Stricker PD; van Leeuwen PJ; Nguyen QA; Ho B; Delprado W; Lee J; Thompson JE; Cusick T; Spriensma AS; Siriwardana AR; Yuen C; Kooner R; Hruby G; O'Neill G; Emmett L
    BJU Int; 2019 Nov; 124 Suppl 1():42-49. PubMed ID: 31287613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Comparison between target magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in-gantry and cognitively directed transperineal or transrectal-guided prostate biopsies for Prostate Imaging-Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) 3-5 MRI lesions.
    Yaxley AJ; Yaxley JW; Thangasamy IA; Ballard E; Pokorny MR
    BJU Int; 2017 Nov; 120 Suppl 3():43-50. PubMed ID: 28749035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Intermediate-term oncological outcomes after a negative endorectal coil multiparametric MRI of the prostate in patients without biopsy proven prostate cancer.
    Kamal O; Comerford J; Foster BR; Young DJ; Amling C; Coakley FV
    Clin Imaging; 2022 Dec; 92():112-116. PubMed ID: 36306588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Dual-tracer PET/CT-targeted, mpMRI-targeted, systematic biopsy, and combined biopsy for the diagnosis of prostate cancer: a pilot study.
    Qiu DX; Li J; Zhang JW; Chen MF; Gao XM; Tang YX; Zhang Y; Yi XP; Yin HL; Gan Y; Wang GL; Zu XB; Hu S; Cai Y
    Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2022 Jul; 49(8):2821-2832. PubMed ID: 34860277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. A clinical available decision support scheme for optimizing prostate biopsy based on mpMRI.
    Hou Y; Jiang KW; Zhang J; Bao ML; Shi HB; Qu JR; Cheng G; Zhang YD
    Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis; 2022 Apr; 25(4):727-734. PubMed ID: 35067674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Can MRI/TRUS fusion targeted biopsy replace saturation prostate biopsy in the re-evaluation of men in active surveillance?
    Pepe P; Garufi A; Priolo G; Pennisi M
    World J Urol; 2016 Sep; 34(9):1249-53. PubMed ID: 26699628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Multiparametric MRI in men with clinical suspicion of prostate cancer undergoing repeat biopsy: a prospective comparison with clinical findings and histopathology.
    Boesen L; Nørgaard N; Løgager V; Balslev I; Thomsen HS
    Acta Radiol; 2018 Mar; 59(3):371-380. PubMed ID: 28679325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Does previous prostate surgery affect multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging accuracy in detecting clinically significant prostate cancer? Results from a single institution series.
    Pellegrino F; Stabile A; Mazzone E; Sorce G; Barletta F; De Angelis M; Brembilla G; Gandaglia G; De Cobelli F; Montorsi F; Briganti A
    Prostate; 2022 Sep; 82(12):1170-1175. PubMed ID: 35538401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.