These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

162 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38459211)

  • 41. [Risk factor analysis on anastomotic leakage after laparoscopic surgery in rectal cancer patient with neoadjuvant therapy and establishment of a nomogram prediction model].
    Jiang W; Feng MY; Dong XY; Dong SM; Zheng JX; Liu XM; Liu WJ; Yan J
    Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2019 Aug; 22(8):748-754. PubMed ID: 31422613
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Laparoscopic conversion in colorectal cancer surgery; is there any improvement over time at a population level?
    de Neree Tot Babberich MPM; van Groningen JT; Dekker E; Wiggers T; Wouters MWJM; Bemelman WA; Tanis PJ;
    Surg Endosc; 2018 Jul; 32(7):3234-3246. PubMed ID: 29344789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Does robotic rectal cancer surgery improve the results of experienced laparoscopic surgeons? An observational single institution study comparing 168 robotic assisted with 184 laparoscopic rectal resections.
    Crolla RMPH; Mulder PG; van der Schelling GP
    Surg Endosc; 2018 Nov; 32(11):4562-4570. PubMed ID: 29761276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Risk and early predictive factors of anastomotic leakage in laparoscopic low anterior resection for rectal cancer.
    Fukada M; Matsuhashi N; Takahashi T; Imai H; Tanaka Y; Yamaguchi K; Yoshida K
    World J Surg Oncol; 2019 Nov; 17(1):178. PubMed ID: 31677643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. [Risk factors of coloanal anastomotic stricture after laparoscopic intersphincteric resection for low rectal cancer].
    Zhang B; Zhuo GZ; Tian L; Zhao K; Zhao Y; Zhao YJ; Zhu J; Zhang T; Ding JH
    Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2019 Aug; 22(8):755-761. PubMed ID: 31422614
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Association of Surgical Approaches and Outcomes in Total Mesorectal Excision and Margin Status for Rectal Cancer.
    Mirza MB; Gamboa AC; Irlmeier R; Hopkins B; Regenbogen SE; Hrebinko KA; Holder-Murray J; Wiseman JT; Ejaz A; Wise PE; Ye F; Idrees K; Hawkins AT; Balch GC; Khan A
    J Surg Res; 2024 Aug; 300():494-502. PubMed ID: 38875948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Comparison of short-term and oncologic outcomes of robotic and laparoscopic resection for mid- and distal rectal cancer.
    Law WL; Foo DCC
    Surg Endosc; 2017 Jul; 31(7):2798-2807. PubMed ID: 27785627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Case-matched study of short-term effects of 3D vs 2D laparoscopic radical resection of rectal cancer.
    Zeng Q; Lei F; Gao Z; Wang Y; Gao QK
    World J Surg Oncol; 2017 Sep; 15(1):178. PubMed ID: 28938898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Surgical Outcomes of Rectal Resection: Our 10 Years Experience.
    Oldani A; Cesana G; Uccelli M; Ciccarese F; Giorgi R; De Carli SM; Villa R; Olmi S
    J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A; 2019 Jun; 29(6):820-825. PubMed ID: 30676247
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Conversion rate in 300 laparoscopic rectal resections and its influence on morbidity and oncological outcome.
    Agha A; Fürst A; Iesalnieks I; Fichtner-Feigl S; Ghali N; Krenz D; Anthuber M; Jauch KW; Piso P; Schlitt HJ
    Int J Colorectal Dis; 2008 Apr; 23(4):409-17. PubMed ID: 18185938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. [Analysis on the technical characteristics and clinical efficacy of robotic-assisted intersphincteric resection for patients with low rectal cancer].
    Liu HC; Li C; Zhang F; Wang XS; Zhang C; Luo HX; Song J; Yu PW; Tang B
    Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2019 Dec; 22(12):1137-1143. PubMed ID: 31874529
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Risk Factors and Outcomes for Conversion to Laparotomy of Laparoscopic Hysterectomy in Benign Gynecology.
    Lim CS; Mowers EL; Mahnert N; Skinner BD; Kamdar N; Morgan DM; As-Sanie S
    Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Dec; 128(6):1295-1305. PubMed ID: 27824755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. [Curative resection with minilaparotomy approach in the treatment of rectal cancer].
    Wang W; Kang Z; Wang C; Xing J; Xu X; Yu E
    Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2018 Mar; 21(3):305-311. PubMed ID: 29577219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Results of laparoscopic anterior resection for rectal adenocarcinoma: retrospective analysis of 157 cases.
    Pugliese R; Di Lernia S; Sansonna F; Scandroglio I; Maggioni D; Ferrari GC; Costanzi A; Magistro C; De Carli S
    Am J Surg; 2008 Feb; 195(2):233-8. PubMed ID: 18083137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Robot-Assisted Total Mesorectal Excision Versus Laparoscopic Total Mesorectal Excision: A Retrospective Propensity Score-Matched Cohort Analysis in Experienced Centers.
    Burghgraef TA; Crolla RMPH; Verheijen PM; Fahim M; van Geloven A; Leijtens JWA; Pronk A; Smits AB; Verdaasdonk EGG; Consten ECJ
    Dis Colon Rectum; 2022 Feb; 65(2):218-227. PubMed ID: 34459449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Comparison of complication and conversion rates between robotic-assisted and laparoscopic rectal resection for rectal cancer: which patients and providers could benefit most from robotic-assisted surgery?
    Ackerman SJ; Daniel S; Baik R; Liu E; Mehendale S; Tackett S; Hellan M
    J Med Econ; 2018 Mar; 21(3):254-261. PubMed ID: 29065737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Laparoscopic vs. open mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: Are these approaches still comparable? A systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Conticchio M; Papagni V; Notarnicola M; Delvecchio A; Riccelli U; Ammendola M; Currò G; Pessaux P; Silvestris N; Memeo R
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(7):e0235887. PubMed ID: 32722694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Impact of conversion on surgical outcomes after laparoscopic operation for rectal carcinoma: a retrospective study of 1,073 patients.
    Yamamoto S; Fukunaga M; Miyajima N; Okuda J; Konishi F; Watanabe M;
    J Am Coll Surg; 2009 Mar; 208(3):383-9. PubMed ID: 19318000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Exploring and adjusting for potential learning effects in ROLARR: a randomised controlled trial comparing robotic-assisted vs. standard laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer resection.
    Corrigan N; Marshall H; Croft J; Copeland J; Jayne D; Brown J
    Trials; 2018 Jun; 19(1):339. PubMed ID: 29945673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Outcomes of Laparoscopic Versus Open Surgery in Elderly Patients with Rectal Cancer.
    Zhang Q; Liang J; Chen J; Mei S; Wang Z
    Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2021 Apr; 22(4):1325-1329. PubMed ID: 33906329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.