These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

128 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38459396)

  • 1. Unseen but influential associates: Properties of words' associates influence lexical and semantic processing.
    Muraki EJ; Pexman PM
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2024 Oct; 31(5):2257-2265. PubMed ID: 38459396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. It's all in the delivery: Effects of context valence, arousal, and concreteness on visual word processing.
    Snefjella B; Kuperman V
    Cognition; 2016 Nov; 156():135-146. PubMed ID: 27567162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Is more always better? Effects of semantic richness on lexical decision, speeded pronunciation, and semantic classification.
    Yap MJ; Tan SE; Pexman PM; Hargreaves IS
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2011 Aug; 18(4):742-50. PubMed ID: 21494916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Getting a grip on sensorimotor effects in lexical-semantic processing.
    Heard A; Madan CR; Protzner AB; Pexman PM
    Behav Res Methods; 2019 Feb; 51(1):1-13. PubMed ID: 29967978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. There are many ways to be rich: effects of three measures of semantic richness on visual word recognition.
    Pexman PM; Hargreaves IS; Siakaluk PD; Bodner GE; Pope J
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2008 Feb; 15(1):161-7. PubMed ID: 18605497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Socialness effects in lexical-semantic processing.
    Diveica V; Muraki EJ; Binney RJ; Pexman PM
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2024 Aug; 50(8):1329-1343. PubMed ID: 38512176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Mapping semantic space: property norms and semantic richness.
    Muraki EJ; Sidhu DM; Pexman PM
    Cogn Process; 2020 Nov; 21(4):637-649. PubMed ID: 31552508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Orthographic neighborhood and concreteness effects in the lexical decision task.
    Samson D; Pillon A
    Brain Lang; 2004 Nov; 91(2):252-64. PubMed ID: 15485714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Visual mismatch negativity elicited by semantic violations in visual words.
    Hu A; Gu F; Wong LLN; Tong X; Zhang X
    Brain Res; 2020 Nov; 1746():147010. PubMed ID: 32663455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A word or two about nonwords: Frequency, semantic neighborhood density, and orthography-to-semantics consistency effects for nonwords in the lexical decision task.
    Hendrix P; Sun CC
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2021 Jan; 47(1):157-183. PubMed ID: 31999159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The role of lexical variables in the visual recognition of two-character Chinese compound words: A megastudy analysis.
    Tse CS; Yap MJ
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2018 Sep; 71(9):2022-2038. PubMed ID: 30117382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The Calgary semantic decision project: concrete/abstract decision data for 10,000 English words.
    Pexman PM; Heard A; Lloyd E; Yap MJ
    Behav Res Methods; 2017 Apr; 49(2):407-417. PubMed ID: 26944579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The time course of visual word recognition as revealed by linear regression analysis of ERP data.
    Hauk O; Davis MH; Ford M; Pulvermüller F; Marslen-Wilson WD
    Neuroimage; 2006 May; 30(4):1383-400. PubMed ID: 16460964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Probing Lexical Ambiguity: Word Vectors Encode Number and Relatedness of Senses.
    Beekhuizen B; Armstrong BC; Stevenson S
    Cogn Sci; 2021 May; 45(5):e12943. PubMed ID: 34018227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Embodied cognition comes of age: A processing advantage for action words is modulated by aging and the task.
    Miklashevsky A; Reifegerste J; García AM; Pulvermüller F; Balota DA; Veríssimo J; Ullman MT
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2024 Jul; 153(7):1725-1764. PubMed ID: 38780562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. You can't Stroop a lexical decision: is semantic processing fundamentally facilitative?
    Schmidt JR; Cheesman J; Besner D
    Can J Exp Psychol; 2013 Jun; 67(2):130-9. PubMed ID: 23205510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Semantic size of abstract concepts: it gets emotional when you can't see it.
    Yao B; Vasiljevic M; Weick M; Sereno ME; O'Donnell PJ; Sereno SC
    PLoS One; 2013; 8(9):e75000. PubMed ID: 24086421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Examining assortativity in the mental lexicon: Evidence from word associations.
    Van Rensbergen B; Storms G; De Deyne S
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2015 Dec; 22(6):1717-24. PubMed ID: 25893712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Examining word processing via a megastudy of conditional reading aloud.
    Cortese MJ; Yates M; Schock J; Vilks L
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2018 Nov; 71(11):2295-2313. PubMed ID: 30362414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Semantic size does not matter: "bigger" words are not recognized faster.
    Kang SH; Yap MJ; Tse CS; Kurby CA
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2011 Jun; 64(6):1041-7. PubMed ID: 21644189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.