These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

152 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38459597)

  • 1. Attractive combinations of female gingival displays, buccal corridor sizes, and facial heights according to orthodontists, dentists, and laypeople of different ages and sexes: a psychometric study.
    Niknam O; Yousefi Hafshejani S; Rakhshan V
    Head Face Med; 2024 Mar; 20(1):17. PubMed ID: 38459597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Psychometric and Perceptometric Comparisons of the Perspectives of Orthodontists, Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons, and Laypeople of Different Ages and Sexes towards Beauty of Female Jaw Angles (Intergonial Widths and Gonial Heights) on Frontal and Three-Quarter Views.
    Moradinejad M; Rekabi A; Ashtiani AH; Atashkar N; Rakhshan V
    Biomed Res Int; 2022; 2022():2595662. PubMed ID: 36398071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Smile attractiveness perception regarding buccal corridor size among different facial types.
    Mollabashi V; Abolvardi M; Akhlaghian M; Ghaffari MI
    Dent Med Probl; 2018; 55(3):305-312. PubMed ID: 30328309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effects of laterality on esthetic preferences of orthodontists, maxillofacial surgeons, and laypeople regarding the lip position and facial convexity: a psychometric clinical trial.
    Mousavi SM; Saeidi Ghorani P; Deilamani A; Rakhshan V
    Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2019 Dec; 23(4):439-451. PubMed ID: 31446526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effect of the gingival display on posed smile with different facial forms: a comparison of dentists and patients concepts.
    Akhare PJ; Daga A
    Indian J Dent Res; 2012; 23(5):568-73. PubMed ID: 23422598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Perception of Altered Smile Esthetics by Orthodontists, Dentists, and Laypeople in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
    Aldeeri AA; Alhababi KA; Algahtani FA; Tounsi AA; Albadr KI
    Clin Cosmet Investig Dent; 2020; 12():563-570. PubMed ID: 33239919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Maxillary arch width and buccal corridor changes with orthodontic treatment. Part 2: attractiveness of the frontal facial smile in extraction and nonextraction outcomes.
    Meyer AH; Woods MG; Manton DJ
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2014 Mar; 145(3):296-304. PubMed ID: 24582021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Changes in smile parameters as perceived by orthodontists, dentists, artists, and laypeople.
    Gul-e-Erum ; Fida M
    World J Orthod; 2008; 9(2):132-40. PubMed ID: 18575307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of gingival display in smile attractiveness among restorative dentists, orthodontists, prosthodontists, periodontists, and laypeople.
    Pinzan-Vercelino CRM; Costa ACS; Ferreira MC; Bramante FS; Fialho MPN; Gurgel JA
    J Prosthet Dent; 2020 Feb; 123(2):314-321. PubMed ID: 31153615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Influence of maxillary canine gingival margin asymmetries on the perception of smile esthetics among orthodontists and laypersons.
    Correa BD; Vieira Bittencourt MA; Machado AW
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2014 Jan; 145(1):55-63. PubMed ID: 24373655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Perceptions of laypersons and orthodontists regarding the buccal corridor in long- and short-face individuals.
    Zange SE; Ramos AL; Cuoghi OA; de Mendonça MR; Suguino R
    Angle Orthod; 2011 Jan; 81(1):86-90. PubMed ID: 20936959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Perception of smile attractiveness among laypeople and orthodontists regarding the buccal corridor space, as it is defined by the eyes. An innovated technique.
    Ntovas P; Karkazi F; Özbilen EÖ; Flavio A; Ladia O; Papazoglou E; Yilmaz HN; Coachman C
    J Esthet Restor Dent; 2023 Mar; 35(2):345-351. PubMed ID: 36628925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Role of buccal corridor in smile esthetics and its correlation with underlying skeletal and dental structures.
    Tikku T; Khanna R; Maurya RP; Ahmad N
    Indian J Dent Res; 2012; 23(2):187-94. PubMed ID: 22945708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Influence of symmetric and asymmetric alterations of maxillary canine gingival margin on the perception of smile esthetics among orthodontists, dentists, and laypersons.
    Katiyar S; Gandhi S; Sodawala J; Anita G; Hamdani S; Jain S
    Indian J Dent Res; 2016; 27(6):586-591. PubMed ID: 28169254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effects of Three Types of Digital Camera Sensors on Dental Specialists' Perception of Smile Esthetics: A Preliminary Double-Blind Clinical Trial.
    Sajjadi SH; Khosravanifard B; Moazzami F; Rakhshan V; Esmaeilpour M
    J Prosthodont; 2016 Dec; 25(8):675-681. PubMed ID: 26393536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The effects of buccal corridor spaces and arch form on smile esthetics.
    Roden-Johnson D; Gallerano R; English J
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2005 Mar; 127(3):343-50. PubMed ID: 15775949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of the influence of dental and facial aesthetics in determining overall attractiveness.
    Prasad KN; Sabrish S; Mathew S; Shivamurthy PG; Pattabiraman V; Sagarkar R
    Int Orthod; 2018 Dec; 16(4):684-697. PubMed ID: 30385289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Orthodontists and lay people rate masculine soft tissue profiles similarly but feminine soft tissue profiles differently.
    Einy S; Miri T; Katzhendler E; Aizenbud D; Emanuela K; Zaslansky P
    Quintessence Int; 2021; 52(1):72-79. PubMed ID: 32954390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Smile esthetics from patients' perspectives for faces of varying attractiveness.
    Chang CA; Fields HW; Beck FM; Springer NC; Firestone AR; Rosenstiel S; Christensen JC
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2011 Oct; 140(4):e171-80. PubMed ID: 21967955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Smile attractiveness related to buccal corridor space in 3 different facial types: A perception of 3 ethnic groups of Malaysians.
    Nimbalkar S; Oh YY; Mok RY; Tioh JY; Yew KJ; Patil PG
    J Prosthet Dent; 2018 Aug; 120(2):252-256. PubMed ID: 29551374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.