These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

139 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38459973)

  • 1. Control strategy under pressure situations: performance pressure conditionally enhances proactive control.
    Liu Z; Tang R
    Psychol Res; 2024 Jun; 88(4):1115-1126. PubMed ID: 38459973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Immediate versus delayed control demands elicit distinct mechanisms for instantiating proactive control.
    Janowich JR; Cavanagh JF
    Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci; 2019 Aug; 19(4):910-926. PubMed ID: 30607833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Why are some individuals better at using negative attentional templates to suppress distractors? Exploration of interindividual differences in cognitive control efficiency.
    Chidharom M; Carlisle NB
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2024 Aug; 50(8):808-818. PubMed ID: 38900526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Electrophysiological evidence for the involvement of proactive and reactive control in a rewarded stop-signal task.
    Schevernels H; Bombeke K; Van der Borght L; Hopf JM; Krebs RM; Boehler CN
    Neuroimage; 2015 Nov; 121():115-25. PubMed ID: 26188262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. ERPs dissociate proactive and reactive control: evidence from a task-switching paradigm with informative and uninformative cues.
    Czernochowski D
    Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci; 2015 Mar; 15(1):117-31. PubMed ID: 24925001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Ocular signatures of proactive versus reactive cognitive control in young adults.
    Mäki-Marttunen V; Hagen T; Aminihajibashi S; Foldal M; Stavrinou M; Halvorsen JH; Laeng B; Espeseth T
    Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci; 2018 Oct; 18(5):1049-1063. PubMed ID: 29992484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Proactive and Reactive Inhibitory Control Strategies: Exploring the Impact of Interindividual Variables on an ERP Continuous Performance Task (AX-CPT).
    Schröder E; Ingels A; Dumitrescu A; Kornreich C; Campanella S
    Clin EEG Neurosci; 2024 May; 55(3):317-328. PubMed ID: 36562088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Limiting motor skill knowledge via incidental training protects against choking under pressure.
    Lee TG; Acuña DE; Kording KP; Grafton ST
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2019 Feb; 26(1):279-290. PubMed ID: 29777527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Delay knowledge and trial set count modulate use of proactive versus reactive control: A meta-analytic review.
    Janowich JR; Cavanagh JF
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2018 Aug; 25(4):1249-1268. PubMed ID: 29980996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Choking under experimenter's presence: Impact on proactive control and practical consequences for psychological science.
    Belletier C; Normand A; Camos V; Barrouillet P; Huguet P
    Cognition; 2019 Aug; 189():60-64. PubMed ID: 30927658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Orchestrating Proactive and Reactive Mechanisms for Filtering Distracting Information: Brain-Behavior Relationships Revealed by a Mixed-Design fMRI Study.
    Marini F; Demeter E; Roberts KC; Chelazzi L; Woldorff MG
    J Neurosci; 2016 Jan; 36(3):988-1000. PubMed ID: 26791226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Social exclusion modulates dual mechanisms of cognitive control: Evidence from ERPs.
    Xu M; Li Z; Qi S; Fan L; Zhou X; Yang D
    Hum Brain Mapp; 2020 Jul; 41(10):2669-2685. PubMed ID: 32491264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Proactive control processes in event-based prospective memory: Evidence from intraindividual variability and ex-Gaussian analyses.
    Ball BH; Brewer GA
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2018 May; 44(5):793-811. PubMed ID: 29239624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Attentional costs of visually guided walking: effects of age, executive function and stepping-task demands.
    Mazaheri M; Roerdink M; Bood RJ; Duysens J; Beek PJ; Peper CL
    Gait Posture; 2014; 40(1):182-6. PubMed ID: 24767613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Cognitive control in context: working memory capacity and proactive control.
    Redick TS
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2014 Jan; 145():1-9. PubMed ID: 24240136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Neural Architecture of Selective Stopping Strategies: Distinct Brain Activity Patterns Are Associated with Attentional Capture But Not with Outright Stopping.
    Sebastian A; Rössler K; Wibral M; Mobascher A; Lieb K; Jung P; Tüscher O
    J Neurosci; 2017 Oct; 37(40):9785-9794. PubMed ID: 28887387
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The role of proactive control on subcomponents of language control: Evidence from trilinguals.
    Liu H; Zhang Y; Blanco-Elorrieta E; He Y; Chen B
    Cognition; 2020 Jan; 194():104055. PubMed ID: 31446389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Expectancy-related modulations of neural oscillations in continuous performance tasks.
    Bickel S; Dias EC; Epstein ML; Javitt DC
    Neuroimage; 2012 Sep; 62(3):1867-76. PubMed ID: 22691613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Reduced Stroop interference under stress: Decreased cue utilisation, not increased executive control.
    Booth RW
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2019 Jun; 72(6):1522-1529. PubMed ID: 30304992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Proactive and reactive cognitive control rely on flexible use of the ventrolateral prefrontal cortex.
    Ryman SG; El Shaikh AA; Shaff NA; Hanlon FM; Dodd AB; Wertz CJ; Ling JM; Barch DM; Stromberg SF; Lin DS; Abrams S; Mayer AR
    Hum Brain Mapp; 2019 Feb; 40(3):955-966. PubMed ID: 30407681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.