These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
111 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38460504)
1. Acute Effect of Video Feedback on Self-Regulation and Proprioceptive Control of Standing Back Tuck Somersault in the Absence of Vision. Abahnini NM; Abahnini K; Mkaouer B Motor Control; 2024 Jul; 28(3):241-261. PubMed ID: 38460504 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Effects of eliminating visual cues on kinetic and kinematic parameters in back tuck somersault: A comparison between artistic gymnasts and parkour athletes. Mohamed Abahnini N; Abahnini K; Mkaouer B Acta Bioeng Biomech; 2023; 25(2):93-101. PubMed ID: 38314533 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Effects of task-specific augmented feedback on deficit modification during performance of the tuck-jump exercise. Stroube BW; Myer GD; Brent JL; Ford KR; Heidt RS; Hewett TE J Sport Rehabil; 2013 Feb; 22(1):7-18. PubMed ID: 23238301 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Gaze behavior of trampoline gymnasts during a back tuck somersault. Natrup J; Bramme J; de Lussanet MHE; Boström KJ; Lappe M; Wagner H Hum Mov Sci; 2020 Apr; 70():102589. PubMed ID: 32217208 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The role of vision in control of orientation in a back tuck somersault. Davlin CD; Sands WA; Shultz BB Motor Control; 2001 Oct; 5(4):337-46. PubMed ID: 11581503 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Handwriting on a tablet screen: Role of visual and proprioceptive feedback in the control of movement by children and adults. Guilbert J; Alamargot D; Morin MF Hum Mov Sci; 2019 Jun; 65():. PubMed ID: 30219272 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Visual feedback use during a back tuck somersault: evidence for optimal visual feedback utilization. Luis M; Tremblay L Motor Control; 2008 Jul; 12(3):210-8. PubMed ID: 18698106 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Effect of three technical arms swings on the elevation of the center of mass during a standing back somersault. Mkaouer B; Jemni M; Amara S; Chaabène H; Padulo J; Tabka Z J Hum Kinet; 2014 Mar; 40():37-48. PubMed ID: 25031671 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Innovative Video Feedback on Jump Landing Improves Landing Technique in Males. Dallinga J; Benjaminse A; Gokeler A; Cortes N; Otten E; Lemmink K Int J Sports Med; 2017 Feb; 38(2):150-158. PubMed ID: 27428644 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Postural control of Parkour athletes compared to recreationally active subjects under different sensory manipulations: A pilot study. Jabnoun S; Borji R; Sahli S Eur J Sport Sci; 2019 May; 19(4):461-470. PubMed ID: 30303464 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Three types of kinematic feedback and the execution of the hang power clean. Rucci JA; Tomporowski PD J Strength Cond Res; 2010 Mar; 24(3):771-8. PubMed ID: 20145553 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Video Feedback and 2-Dimensional Landing Kinematics in Elite Female Handball Players. Benjaminse A; Postma W; Janssen I; Otten E J Athl Train; 2017 Nov; 52(11):993-1001. PubMed ID: 29035582 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Show Me, Tell Me, Encourage Me: The Effect of Different Forms of Feedback on Resistance Training Performance. Weakley J; Wilson K; Till K; Banyard H; Dyson J; Phibbs P; Read D; Jones B J Strength Cond Res; 2020 Nov; 34(11):3157-3163. PubMed ID: 33105366 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Modifying spike jump landing biomechanics in female adolescent volleyball athletes using video and verbal feedback. Parsons JL; Alexander MJ J Strength Cond Res; 2012 Apr; 26(4):1076-84. PubMed ID: 22446676 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Kinematic and kinetic analysis of two gymnastics acrobatic series to performing the backward stretched somersault. Mkaouer B; Jemni M; Amara S; Chaabène H; Tabka Z J Hum Kinet; 2013; 37():17-26. PubMed ID: 24146701 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Augmented feedback supports skill transfer and reduces high-risk injury landing mechanics: a double-blind, randomized controlled laboratory study. Myer GD; Stroube BW; DiCesare CA; Brent JL; Ford KR; Heidt RS; Hewett TE Am J Sports Med; 2013 Mar; 41(3):669-77. PubMed ID: 23371471 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Using proprioception to control ongoing actions: dominance of vision or altered proprioceptive weighing? Goodman R; Tremblay L Exp Brain Res; 2018 Jul; 236(7):1897-1910. PubMed ID: 29696313 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Force control in the absence of visual and tactile feedback. Mugge W; Abbink DA; Schouten AC; van der Helm FC; Arendzen JH; Meskers CG Exp Brain Res; 2013 Feb; 224(4):635-45. PubMed ID: 23223780 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Females Decrease Vertical Ground Reaction Forces Following 4-Week Jump-Landing Feedback Intervention Without Negative Affect on Vertical Jump Performance. Ericksen HM; Lefevre C; Luc-Harkey BA; Thomas AC; Gribble PA; Pietrosimone B J Sport Rehabil; 2019 Nov; 28(8):866-870. PubMed ID: 30300051 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Robot-Assisted Proprioceptive Training with Added Vibro-Tactile Feedback Enhances Somatosensory and Motor Performance. Cuppone AV; Squeri V; Semprini M; Masia L; Konczak J PLoS One; 2016; 11(10):e0164511. PubMed ID: 27727321 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]