118 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38462287)
1. Modelling-based joint embedding of histology and genomics using canonical correlation analysis for breast cancer survival prediction.
Subramanian V; Syeda-Mahmood T; Do MN
Artif Intell Med; 2024 Mar; 149():102787. PubMed ID: 38462287
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Quantifying common and distinct information in single-cell multimodal data with Tilted Canonical Correlation Analysis.
Lin KZ; Zhang NR
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2023 Aug; 120(32):e2303647120. PubMed ID: 37523521
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Deep learning based feature-level integration of multi-omics data for breast cancer patients survival analysis.
Tong L; Mitchel J; Chatlin K; Wang MD
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak; 2020 Sep; 20(1):225. PubMed ID: 32933515
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Integrating multi-omics data by learning modality invariant representations for improved prediction of overall survival of cancer.
Tong L; Wu H; Wang MD
Methods; 2021 May; 189():74-85. PubMed ID: 32763377
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Predicting censored survival data based on the interactions between meta-dimensional omics data in breast cancer.
Kim D; Li R; Dudek SM; Ritchie MD
J Biomed Inform; 2015 Aug; 56():220-8. PubMed ID: 26048077
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.
Crider K; Williams J; Qi YP; Gutman J; Yeung L; Mai C; Finkelstain J; Mehta S; Pons-Duran C; Menéndez C; Moraleda C; Rogers L; Daniels K; Green P
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2022 Feb; 2(2022):. PubMed ID: 36321557
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Tightly integrated multiomics-based deep tensor survival model for time-to-event prediction.
Zhang JZ; Xu W; Hu P
Bioinformatics; 2022 Jun; 38(12):3259-3266. PubMed ID: 35445698
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Integrating genomic data and pathological images to effectively predict breast cancer clinical outcome.
Sun D; Li A; Tang B; Wang M
Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2018 Jul; 161():45-53. PubMed ID: 29852967
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. MAMF-GCN: Multi-scale adaptive multi-channel fusion deep graph convolutional network for predicting mental disorder.
Pan J; Lin H; Dong Y; Wang Y; Ji Y
Comput Biol Med; 2022 Sep; 148():105823. PubMed ID: 35872410
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Topological integration of RPPA proteomic data with multi-omics data for survival prediction in breast cancer via pathway activity inference.
Kim TR; Jeong HH; Sohn KA
BMC Med Genomics; 2019 Jul; 12(Suppl 5):94. PubMed ID: 31296204
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. D-CCA: A Decomposition-based Canonical Correlation Analysis for High-Dimensional Datasets.
Shu H; Wang X; Zhu H
J Am Stat Assoc; 2020; 115(529):292-306. PubMed ID: 33311817
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A plea for taking all available clinical information into account when assessing the predictive value of omics data.
Volkmann A; De Bin R; Sauerbrei W; Boulesteix AL
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2019 Jul; 19(1):162. PubMed ID: 31340753
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Deep learning assisted multi-omics integration for survival and drug-response prediction in breast cancer.
Malik V; Kalakoti Y; Sundar D
BMC Genomics; 2021 Mar; 22(1):214. PubMed ID: 33761889
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Integrative, multi-omics, analysis of blood samples improves model predictions: applications to cancer.
Ponzi E; Thoresen M; Haugdahl Nøst T; Møllersen K
BMC Bioinformatics; 2021 Aug; 22(1):395. PubMed ID: 34353282
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Integration and Analysis of CPTAC Proteomics Data in the Context of Cancer Genomics in the cBioPortal.
Wu P; Heins ZJ; Muller JT; Katsnelson L; de Bruijn I; Abeshouse AA; Schultz N; Fenyö D; Gao J
Mol Cell Proteomics; 2019 Sep; 18(9):1893-1898. PubMed ID: 31308250
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The Discovery of Novel Biomarkers Improves Breast Cancer Intrinsic Subtype Prediction and Reconciles the Labels in the METABRIC Data Set.
Milioli HH; Vimieiro R; Riveros C; Tishchenko I; Berretta R; Moscato P
PLoS One; 2015; 10(7):e0129711. PubMed ID: 26132585
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Predicting breast cancer drug response using a multiple-layer cell line drug response network model.
Huang S; Hu P; Lakowski TM
BMC Cancer; 2021 May; 21(1):648. PubMed ID: 34059012
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Sparse canonical correlation analysis from a predictive point of view.
Wilms I; Croux C
Biom J; 2015 Sep; 57(5):834-51. PubMed ID: 26147637
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Robust sparse canonical correlation analysis.
Wilms I; Croux C
BMC Syst Biol; 2016 Aug; 10(1):72. PubMed ID: 27516087
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. GPDBN: deep bilinear network integrating both genomic data and pathological images for breast cancer prognosis prediction.
Wang Z; Li R; Wang M; Li A
Bioinformatics; 2021 Sep; 37(18):2963-2970. PubMed ID: 33734318
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
