These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
134 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38463724)
1. [Photoelastic models applied to dental restorations]. Marín-Miranda M; Juárez-López ML; Espinosa-Bautista A Rev Cient Odontol (Lima); 2021; 9(4):e084. PubMed ID: 38463724 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Polymerization contraction stress of resin composite restorations in a model Class I cavity configuration using photoelastic analysis. Kinomoto Y; Torii M; Takeshige F; Ebisu S J Esthet Dent; 2000; 12(6):309-19. PubMed ID: 14743526 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Polymerization contraction stresses of resin-based composite restorations within beveled cavity preparations of Class I restorations. Kinomoto Y; Torii M; Takeshige F; Ebisu S Am J Dent; 2003 Apr; 16(2):139-43. PubMed ID: 12797575 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Effect of occlusal restoration on stresses around class V restoration interface: a finite-element study. Vasudeva G; Bogra P; Nikhil V; Singh V Indian J Dent Res; 2011; 22(2):295-302. PubMed ID: 21891903 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Influence of occlusal contact area on cusp defection and stress distribution. Costa AK; Xavier TA; Paes-Junior TJ; Andreatta-Filho OD; Borges AL J Contemp Dent Pract; 2014 Nov; 15(6):699-704. PubMed ID: 25825093 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of pattern of failure of resin composite restorations in non-carious cervical lesions with and without occlusal wear facets. Oginni AO; Adeleke AA J Dent; 2014 Jul; 42(7):824-30. PubMed ID: 24746714 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The significance of occlusion in restorative dentistry. Parker MW Dent Clin North Am; 1993 Jul; 37(3):341-51. PubMed ID: 8348990 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Superficial roughness on composite surface, composite enamel and composite dentin junctions after different finishing and polishing procedures. Part I: roughness after treatments with tungsten carbide vs diamond burs. Ferraris F; Conti A Int J Esthet Dent; 2014; 9(1):70-89. PubMed ID: 24757700 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Photoelastic analysis of stress transfer by endodontically treated teeth to the supporting structure using different restorative techniques. Assif D; Oren E; Marshak BL; Aviv I J Prosthet Dent; 1989 May; 61(5):535-43. PubMed ID: 2664139 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Load-induced stresses in photoelastic primary canines with facial restorations. Rabitz GK; Berson R; Caputo AA; Franklin RJ; Del Fierro DB J Dent Child (Chic); 2006; 73(3):170-4. PubMed ID: 17367035 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Fracture load and failure mode of semi-direct resin composite occlusal veneers: Influence of design and mechanical cycling. Martins WF; Coelho CSS; Amaral FLBD; França FMG; Turssi CP; Cavalli V; Basting RT J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2023 Aug; 144():105961. PubMed ID: 37320893 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Influence of restorative technique on the biomechanical behavior of endodontically treated maxillary premolars. Part II: strain measurement and stress distribution. Soares PV; Santos-Filho PC; Gomide HA; Araujo CA; Martins LR; Soares CJ J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Feb; 99(2):114-22. PubMed ID: 18262012 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Effects of tooth preparation burs and luting cement types on the marginal fit of extracoronal restorations. Ayad MF J Prosthodont; 2009 Feb; 18(2):145-51. PubMed ID: 19054303 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of the correlation of photoelasticity and digital imaging to characterize the load transfer of implant-supported restorations. Tiossi R; de Torres EM; Rodrigues RC; Conrad HJ; de Mattos Mda G; Fok AS; Ribeiro RF J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Aug; 112(2):276-84. PubMed ID: 24461947 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Long-Term Follow-Up of Restorations of Equine Cheek Teeth Infundibula (2006-2017). Pearce CJ; Brooks N Front Vet Sci; 2021; 8():793631. PubMed ID: 35127882 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Efficacy of two methods for restorative materials' removal in primary teeth. Bittar DG; Murakami C; Hesse D; Imparato JC; Mendes FM J Contemp Dent Pract; 2011 Sep; 12(5):372-8. PubMed ID: 22269199 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A clinical evaluation of a giomer restorative system containing surface prereacted glass ionomer filler: results from a 13-year recall examination. Gordan VV; Blaser PK; Watson RE; Mjör IA; McEdward DL; Sensi LG; Riley JL J Am Dent Assoc; 2014 Oct; 145(10):1036-43. PubMed ID: 25270702 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A comparison of stresses in molar teeth restored with inlays and direct restorations, including polymerization shrinkage of composite resin and tooth loading during mastication. Dejak B; Młotkowski A Dent Mater; 2015 Mar; 31(3):e77-87. PubMed ID: 25544104 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Periodontal considerations in restorative and implant therapy. Goldberg PV; Higginbottom FL; Wilson TG Periodontol 2000; 2001; 25():100-9. PubMed ID: 11155185 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]