These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

133 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38465274)

  • 1. [Comparison of sagittal condylar guidance obtained from radiographic and clinical records in dentate patients].
    Ñahuincopa-Ríos RJ; Ñahuincopa-López PM; Ángeles-López RG
    Rev Cient Odontol (Lima); 2021; 9(2):e060. PubMed ID: 38465274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Condylar guidance: correlation between protrusive interocclusal record and panoramic radiographic image: a pilot study.
    Tannamala PK; Pulagam M; Pottem SR; Swapna B
    J Prosthodont; 2012 Apr; 21(3):181-4. PubMed ID: 22339685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparative analysis of sagittal condylar guidance by protrusive interocclusal records with panoramic and lateral cephalogram radiographs in dentulous population: A clinico-radiographic study.
    Galagali G; Kalekhan SM; Nidawani P; Naik J; Behera S
    J Indian Prosthodont Soc; 2016; 16(2):148-53. PubMed ID: 27141164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The Effect of Average Value Mounting and Facebow Transfer on Condylar Guidance Settings in a Semi-Adjustable Articulator - A Comparative Study using Digital Lateral Cephalographs in Edentulous Patients.
    Mustafa MZ; Shetty G; Deeban Y; Mathar MI; Joseph AM; Aldhuwayhi S; Thakare AA; Al-Hamad KA; Shamsudeen SM; Ayub MS
    Niger J Clin Pract; 2024 Sep; 27(9):1044-1050. PubMed ID: 39348323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A clinico-radiographic analysis of sagittal condylar guidance determined by protrusive interocclusal registration and panoramic radiographic images in humans.
    Prasad KD; Shah N; Hegde C
    Contemp Clin Dent; 2012 Oct; 3(4):383-7. PubMed ID: 23633793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparative evaluation of sagittal condylar guidance obtained from a clinical method and with cone beam computed tomography in dentate individuals.
    Das A; Muddugangadhar BC; Mawani DP; Mukhopadhyay A
    J Prosthet Dent; 2021 May; 125(5):753-757. PubMed ID: 32423552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Sagittal condylar guidance angle measurement methods: A systematic review.
    Lassmann Ł; Nowak Z; Żółtowska A
    J Prosthet Dent; 2024 Jul; 132(1):81-92. PubMed ID: 38123416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparative evaluation of condylar guidance obtained by three different interocclusal recording materials in a semi-adjustable articulator and digital panoramic radiographic images in dentate patients: An
    Keerthana SR; Mohammed HS; Hariprasad A; Anand M; Ayesha S
    J Indian Prosthodont Soc; 2021; 21(4):397-404. PubMed ID: 34810368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of Sagittal Condylar Guidance Angle Obtained by Radiographic Methods and Manual Programming of Articulators in Dentate Patients - A Clinico-radiographic Study.
    Agrawal N; Rodrigues SJ; Mahesh M; Shetty TB; Pai UY; Saldanha S; Hegde P; Ahmed J; Srikant N
    Contemp Clin Dent; 2024; 15(2):105-112. PubMed ID: 39206233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Assessment of Sagittal Condylar Guidance with Protrusive Inter-occlusal Method, Panoramic Radiographs, and Lateral Cephalogram: A Comparative Study.
    Singh K; Singh A; Jayam C; Singh R; Huda I; Nabi AT
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2021 Jan; 22(1):47-50. PubMed ID: 34028362
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of accuracy of protrusive condylar guidance registration by two interocclusal recording materials in edentulous patients.
    Kumar CD; Selvaraj S; Mohan J; Raju R
    Ann Afr Med; 2023; 22(3):316-320. PubMed ID: 37417019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A comparative study to evaluate the discrepancy in condylar guidance values between two commercially available arcon and non-arcon articulators: a clinical study.
    Goyal MK; Goyal S
    Indian J Dent Res; 2011; 22(6):880. PubMed ID: 22484898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A comparative study on the influence of third point of reference on condylar guidance settings in a semi-adjustable articulator with lateral cephalographs: An in-vivo study.
    Aldhuwayhi S; Mustafa MZ; Shaikh SA; Mehta S; Mathar MI; Thakare AA; Varadharaju VK; Ayub MS; Shamsudeen SM; A Khan AR
    Niger J Clin Pract; 2021 Oct; 24(10):1457-1462. PubMed ID: 34657010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A clinico-radiographic study to compare and co-relate sagittal condylar guidance determined by intraoral gothic arch tracing method and panoramic radiograph in completely edentulous patients.
    Shetty S; Kunta M; Shenoy K
    J Indian Prosthodont Soc; 2018; 18(1):19-23. PubMed ID: 29430137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparative Analysis of Sagittal Condylar Guidance Recorded by Intraoral Gothic Arch Tracing and Panoramic Radiograph in Completely Edentulous Patients.
    Sirana P; Kumar N; Malhotra A; Singhal N; Chaudhary N
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2018 Nov; 19(11):1301-1305. PubMed ID: 30602631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Correlation between sagittal condylar guidance angles obtained using radiographic and protrusive occlusal record methods.
    Kwon OK; Yang SW; Kim JH
    J Adv Prosthodont; 2017 Aug; 9(4):302-307. PubMed ID: 28874998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of Sagittal Condylar Guidance Determined by Panoramic Radiographs to the One Determined by Conventional Methods Using Lateral Interocclusal Records in the Saudi Arabian Population.
    Dewan H; Akkam TI; Chohan H; Sherwani A; Masha F; Dhae M
    J Int Soc Prev Community Dent; 2019; 9(6):597-604. PubMed ID: 32039080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of condylar guidance setting obtained from a wax record versus an extraoral tracing: a pilot study.
    dos Santos J; Nelson S; Nowlin T
    J Prosthet Dent; 2003 Jan; 89(1):54-9. PubMed ID: 12589287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Evaluation of sagittal condylar guidance angles using computerized pantographic tracings, protrusive interocclusal records, and 3D-CBCT imaging techniques for oral rehabilitation.
    Naqash TA; Chaturvedi S; Yaqoob A; Saquib S; Addas MK; Alfarsi M
    Niger J Clin Pract; 2020 Apr; 23(4):550-554. PubMed ID: 32246664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Recording sagittal condylar angles using a mandibular facebow.
    Johnson A; Winstanley RB
    J Oral Rehabil; 1997 Dec; 24(12):904-8. PubMed ID: 9467992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.