120 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38466208)
1. Corneal Hysteresis as a Marker for Patients with Secondary Glaucoma.
Oydanich M; Uppuluri A; Sadek H; Khouri AS
Semin Ophthalmol; 2024 Jul; 39(5):376-380. PubMed ID: 38466208
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Corneal viscoelastic differences between pseudoexfoliative glaucoma and primary open-angle glaucoma.
Ozkok A; Tamcelik N; Ozdamar A; Sarici AM; Cicik E
J Glaucoma; 2013 Dec; 22(9):740-5. PubMed ID: 24299728
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of ocular response analyzer parameters in chinese subjects with primary angle-closure and primary open-angle glaucoma.
Narayanaswamy A; Su DH; Baskaran M; Tan AC; Nongpiur ME; Htoon HM; Wong TY; Aung T
Arch Ophthalmol; 2011 Apr; 129(4):429-34. PubMed ID: 21482869
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of ocular response analyzer parameters in primary open angle glaucoma and exfoliative glaucoma patients.
Beyazyıldız E; Beyazyıldız O; Arifoğlu HB; Altıntaş AK; Köklü SG
Indian J Ophthalmol; 2014 Jul; 62(7):782-7. PubMed ID: 25116770
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Relationship between corneal biomechanical properties, central corneal thickness, and intraocular pressure across the spectrum of glaucoma.
Kaushik S; Pandav SS; Banger A; Aggarwal K; Gupta A
Am J Ophthalmol; 2012 May; 153(5):840-849.e2. PubMed ID: 22310080
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Diagnostic Efficacy of Normalization of Corneal Deformation Variables by the Intraocular Pressure in Glaucomatous Eyes.
Tejwani S; Devi S; Dinakaran S; Shetty R; Meshram P; Francis M; Sinha Roy A
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2016 Mar; 57(3):1082-6. PubMed ID: 26968738
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of the corneal biomechanical properties with the Ocular Response Analyzer® (ORA) in African and Caucasian normal subjects and patients with glaucoma.
Detry-Morel M; Jamart J; Hautenauven F; Pourjavan S
Acta Ophthalmol; 2012 Mar; 90(2):e118-24. PubMed ID: 21989354
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Corneal hysteresis in post-radial keratotomy primary open-angle glaucoma.
Hardin JS; Lee CI; Lane LF; Hester CC; Morshedi RG
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2018 Oct; 256(10):1971-1976. PubMed ID: 30039270
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Evaluation of corneal biomechanical properties with the Reichert Ocular Response Analyzer.
Detry-Morel M; Jamart J; Pourjavan S
Eur J Ophthalmol; 2011; 21(2):138-48. PubMed ID: 20853262
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Corneal hysteresis in normal subjects and in patients with primary open-angle glaucoma and pseudoexfoliation glaucoma.
Ayala M
Ophthalmic Res; 2011 Oct; 46(4):187-91. PubMed ID: 21474969
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Evaluation of the Ocular Response Analyzer in ocular hypertension, glaucoma, and normal populations. Prospective study on 329 eyes].
Streho M; Dariel R; Giraud JM; Verret C; Fenolland JR; Crochelet O; May F; Maurin JF; Renard JP
J Fr Ophtalmol; 2008 Dec; 31(10):953-60. PubMed ID: 19107070
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Combining corneal hysteresis with central corneal thickness and intraocular pressure for glaucoma risk assessment.
Pensyl D; Sullivan-Mee M; Torres-Monte M; Halverson K; Qualls C
Eye (Lond); 2012 Oct; 26(10):1349-56. PubMed ID: 22878449
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Measurement of viscoelastic corneal parameters (corneal hysteresis) in patients with primary open angle glaucoma].
Schroeder B; Hager A; Kutschan A; Wiegand W
Ophthalmologe; 2008 Oct; 105(10):916-20. PubMed ID: 18415104
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Assessment of corneal biomechanical properties in normal tension glaucoma and comparison with open-angle glaucoma, ocular hypertension, and normal eyes.
Grise-Dulac A; Saad A; Abitbol O; Febbraro JL; Azan E; Moulin-Tyrode C; Gatinel D
J Glaucoma; 2012 Sep; 21(7):486-9. PubMed ID: 21734593
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Corneal biomechanical properties in primary open angle glaucoma and normal tension glaucoma.
Ang GS; Bochmann F; Townend J; Azuara-Blanco A
J Glaucoma; 2008; 17(4):259-62. PubMed ID: 18552609
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Use of corneal hysteresis and corneal resistance factor in target intraocular pressure estimation in patients with early primary open-angle glaucoma.
Sallam MA; Elghareib ME
Int Ophthalmol; 2022 Mar; 42(3):891-902. PubMed ID: 34633607
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Corneal biomechanics measured with the ocular response analyser in patients with unilateral open-angle glaucoma.
Hirneiss C; Neubauer AS; Yu A; Kampik A; Kernt M
Acta Ophthalmol; 2011 Mar; 89(2):e189-92. PubMed ID: 21288308
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Corneal biomechanical properties affect Goldmann applanation tonometry in primary open-angle glaucoma.
Costin BR; Fleming GP; Weber PA; Mahmoud AM; Roberts CJ
J Glaucoma; 2014 Feb; 23(2):69-74. PubMed ID: 23603825
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Changes in biomechanical properties of the ocular fibrous tunic in patients with primary open-angle glaucoma in response to drug-induced stress-relief tests].
Makashova NV; Vasilyeva AE
Vestn Oftalmol; 2017; 133(4):31-36. PubMed ID: 28980563
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Association between corneal hysteresis and central corneal thickness in glaucomatous and non-glaucomatous eyes.
Mangouritsas G; Morphis G; Mourtzoukos S; Feretis E
Acta Ophthalmol; 2009 Nov; 87(8):901-5. PubMed ID: 18937814
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
