These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

239 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38466495)

  • 1. Propensity matched analysis of minimally invasive and open radical resection for rectal cancer: comparison of short-term outcomes in elderly/frail patients.
    Li R; Zhou J; Zhao S; Sun L; Fu Y; Zhang C; Sun Q; Wang D
    J Robot Surg; 2024 Mar; 18(1):117. PubMed ID: 38466495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Propensity matched analysis of robotic and laparoscopic operations for mid-low rectal cancer: short-term comparison of anal function and oncological outcomes.
    Li R; Zhou J; Zhao S; Sun Q; Wang D
    J Robot Surg; 2023 Oct; 17(5):2339-2350. PubMed ID: 37402961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Minimally invasive versus open multivisceral resection for rectal cancer clinically invading adjacent organs: a propensity score-matched analysis.
    Abe S; Nozawa H; Sasaki K; Murono K; Emoto S; Yokoyama Y; Matsuzaki H; Nagai Y; Shinagawa T; Sonoda H; Ishihara S
    Surg Endosc; 2024 Jun; 38(6):3263-3272. PubMed ID: 38658387
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Minimally invasive surgery in elderly patients with rectal cancer: An analysis of the Bi-National Colorectal Cancer Audit (BCCA).
    van Harten MJ; Greenwood EB; Bedrikovetski S; Dudi-Venkata NN; Hunter RA; Kroon HM; Sammour T
    Eur J Surg Oncol; 2020 Sep; 46(9):1649-1655. PubMed ID: 32312590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Open versus minimally invasive surgery for rectal cancer: a single-center cohort study on 237 consecutive patients.
    Quero G; Rosa F; Ricci R; Fiorillo C; Giustiniani MC; Cina C; Menghi R; Doglietto GB; Alfieri S
    Updates Surg; 2019 Sep; 71(3):493-504. PubMed ID: 30868546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Outcomes of Minimally Invasive Versus Open Proctectomy for Rectal Cancer: A Propensity-Matched Analysis of Bi-National Colorectal Cancer Audit Data.
    Bedrikovetski S; Dudi-Venkata NN; Kroon HM; Moore JW; Hunter RA; Sammour T
    Dis Colon Rectum; 2020 Jun; 63(6):778-787. PubMed ID: 32109916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Superior pathologic and clinical outcomes after minimally invasive rectal cancer resection, compared to open resection.
    Lee GC; Bordeianou LG; Francone TD; Blaszkowsky LS; Goldstone RN; Ricciardi R; Kunitake H; Qadan M
    Surg Endosc; 2020 Aug; 34(8):3435-3448. PubMed ID: 31844971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Robotic versus laparoscopic rectal resection for sphincter-saving surgery: pathological and short-term outcomes in a single-center analysis of 130 consecutive patients.
    Valverde A; Goasguen N; Oberlin O; Svrcek M; Fléjou JF; Sezeur A; Mosnier H; Houdart R; Lupinacci RM
    Surg Endosc; 2017 Oct; 31(10):4085-4091. PubMed ID: 28271268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The impact of robotic surgery for mid and low rectal cancer: a case-matched analysis of a 3-arm comparison--open, laparoscopic, and robotic surgery.
    Kang J; Yoon KJ; Min BS; Hur H; Baik SH; Kim NK; Lee KY
    Ann Surg; 2013 Jan; 257(1):95-101. PubMed ID: 23059496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Comparative study of clinical outcomes of robot versus laparoscopic radical surgery for rectal cancer based on propensity score matching].
    Ye SP; Shi J; Liu DN; Jiang QG; Lei X; Tang C; Qiu H; Li TY
    Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2019 Jun; 57(6):447-451. PubMed ID: 31142070
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Efficacy comparison between robot-assisted and laparoscopic surgery for mid-low rectal cancer: a prospective randomized controlled trial].
    Tang B; Gao GM; Zou Z; Liu DN; Tang C; Jiang QG; Lei X; Li TY
    Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2020 Apr; 23(4):377-383. PubMed ID: 32306606
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Outcomes in rectal cancer patients undergoing laparoscopic or robotic low anterior resection compared to open: a propensity-matched analysis of the NCDB (2010-2015).
    Chapman BC; Edgcomb M; Gleisner A; Vogel JD
    Surg Endosc; 2020 Nov; 34(11):4754-4771. PubMed ID: 31728754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Minimally invasive versus open intersphincteric resection of low rectal cancer regardless of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy: long-term oncologic outcomes.
    Shin JK; Kim HC; Lee WY; Yun SH; Cho YB; Huh JW; Park YA
    Sci Rep; 2021 May; 11(1):11001. PubMed ID: 34040037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Feasibility and safety of minimally invasive multivisceral resection for T4b rectal cancer: A 9-year review.
    Chan KS; Liu B; Tan MNA; How KY; Wong KY
    World J Gastrointest Surg; 2024 Mar; 16(3):777-789. PubMed ID: 38577068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Minimally invasive surgery as a treatment option for gastric cancer with liver metastasis: a comparison with open surgery.
    Li J; Xi H; Cui J; Zhang K; Gao Y; Liang W; Cai A; Wei B; Chen L
    Surg Endosc; 2018 Mar; 32(3):1422-1433. PubMed ID: 29075971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The impact of surgical approach on short- and long-term outcomes after rectal cancer resection in elderly patients: a national cancer database propensity score matched comparison of robotic, laparoscopic, and open approaches.
    Horsey ML; Parascandola SA; Sparks AD; Hota S; Ng M; Obias V
    Surg Endosc; 2022 Feb; 36(2):1269-1277. PubMed ID: 33638109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Robotic versus conventional laparoscopic rectal cancer surgery in obese patients.
    Gorgun E; Ozben V; Costedio M; Stocchi L; Kalady M; Remzi F
    Colorectal Dis; 2016 Nov; 18(11):1063-1071. PubMed ID: 27154266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Robotic versus laparoscopic surgery for middle and low rectal cancer (REAL): short-term outcomes of a multicentre randomised controlled trial.
    Feng Q; Yuan W; Li T; Tang B; Jia B; Zhou Y; Zhang W; Zhao R; Zhang C; Cheng L; Zhang X; Liang F; He G; Wei Y; Xu J;
    Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2022 Nov; 7(11):991-1004. PubMed ID: 36087608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Minimally invasive surgery as a treatment option for gastric cancer in the elderly: comparison with open surgery for patients 80 years and older.
    Kwon IG; Cho I; Guner A; Kim HI; Noh SH; Hyung WJ
    Surg Endosc; 2015 Aug; 29(8):2321-30. PubMed ID: 25480603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Short-term efficacy of robotic-assisted total mesorectal excision with and without lateral lymph node dissection for mid-low advanced rectal cancer: a propensity score matching analysis].
    Shi FY; Zhang L; Qin Q; Jin X; Hu CH; Yu TY; Ma L; Wang GH; Wu H; Xia P; Sun XJ; She JJ
    Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2020 Apr; 23(4):370-376. PubMed ID: 32306605
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.