BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

136 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38466620)

  • 1. Are front crash prevention systems less effective at preventing rear-end crashes where trucks and motorcycles are struck?
    Cicchino JB; Kidd DG
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2024; 25(3):440-444. PubMed ID: 38466620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effects of forward collision warning and automatic emergency braking on rear-end crashes involving pickup trucks.
    Cicchino JB
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2023; 24(4):293-298. PubMed ID: 36853168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Improving the safety relevance of automatic emergency braking testing programs: An examination of common characteristics of police-reported rear-end crashes in the United States.
    Kidd DG
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2022; 23(sup1):S137-S142. PubMed ID: 35767826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effectiveness of front crash prevention systems in reducing large truck real-world crash rates.
    Teoh ER
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2021; 22(4):284-289. PubMed ID: 33769151
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effectiveness of forward collision warning and autonomous emergency braking systems in reducing front-to-rear crash rates.
    Cicchino JB
    Accid Anal Prev; 2017 Feb; 99(Pt A):142-152. PubMed ID: 27898367
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Characteristics of rear-end crashes involving passenger vehicles with automatic emergency braking.
    Cicchino JB; Zuby DS
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2019; 20(sup1):S112-S118. PubMed ID: 31381436
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Forward collision warning system impact.
    Hubele N; Kennedy K
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2018; 19(sup2):S78-S83. PubMed ID: 30001148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. How can front crash prevention systems address more police-reported crashes in the United States?
    Kidd DG; Teoh ER; Jermakian JS
    Accid Anal Prev; 2023 Oct; 191():107199. PubMed ID: 37406545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Motorcycle crashes potentially preventable by three crash avoidance technologies on passenger vehicles.
    Teoh ER
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2018 Jul; 19(5):513-517. PubMed ID: 29624413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Analyzing driver injury severity in two-vehicle rear-end crashes considering leading-following configurations based on passenger car and light truck involvement.
    Zou R; Yang H; Yu W; Yu H; Chen C; Zhang G; Ma DT
    Accid Anal Prev; 2023 Dec; 193():107298. PubMed ID: 37738845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Characteristics of automatic emergency braking responses in passenger vehicles evaluated in the IIHS front crash prevention program.
    Kidd DG; Perez-Rapela D; Jermakian JS
    Accid Anal Prev; 2023 Sep; 190():107150. PubMed ID: 37301163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of Expected Crash and Injury Reduction from Production Forward Collision and Lane Departure Warning Systems.
    Kusano KD; Gabler HC
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2015; 16 Suppl 2():S109-14. PubMed ID: 26436219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Significance of tractor-trailer impacts to the rear of light vehicles.
    Viano DC; Parenteau CS
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2022; 23(4):169-175. PubMed ID: 35244522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Can the speed limit be used as a surrogate for the striking vehicle's travel speed or delta-V in police-reported rear-end crashes?
    Kidd DG
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2023; 24(3):178-183. PubMed ID: 35929865
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Potential benefits of underride guards in large truck side crashes.
    Brumbelow ML
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2012; 13(6):592-9. PubMed ID: 23137090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Further development of Motorcycle Autonomous Emergency Braking (MAEB), what can in-depth studies tell us? A multinational study.
    Savino G; Rizzi M; Brown J; Piantini S; Meredith L; Albanese B; Pierini M; Fitzharris M
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2014; 15 Suppl 1():S165-72. PubMed ID: 25307383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Assessment of the effect of motorcycle autonomous emergency braking (MAEB) based on real-world crashes.
    Piantini S; Aathresh VN; Savino G; Pierini M
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2022; 23(sup1):S174-S180. PubMed ID: 36200698
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Potential Occupant Injury Reduction in Pre-Crash System Equipped Vehicles in the Striking Vehicle of Rear-end Crashes.
    Kusano KD; Gabler HC
    Ann Adv Automot Med; 2010; 54():203-14. PubMed ID: 21050603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Motorcycle active safety systems: Assessment of the function and applicability using a population-based crash data set.
    Savino G; Pierini M; Fitzharris M
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2019; 20(4):406-412. PubMed ID: 31059290
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Field effectiveness of general motors advanced driver assistance and headlighting systems.
    Leslie AJ; Kiefer RJ; Meitzner MR; Flannagan CA
    Accid Anal Prev; 2021 Sep; 159():106275. PubMed ID: 34242861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.