These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
152 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38466923)
21. Use of the metal artefact reduction tool in the identification of fractured endodontic instruments in cone-beam computed tomography. Costa ED; Brasil DM; Queiroz PM; Verner FS; Junqueira RB; Freitas DQ Int Endod J; 2020 Apr; 53(4):506-512. PubMed ID: 31655019 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Prototype metal artefact reduction algorithm in flat panel computed tomography - evaluation in patients undergoing transarterial hepatic radioembolisation. Hamie QM; Kobe AR; Mietzsch L; Manhart M; Puippe GD; Pfammatter T; Guggenberger R Eur Radiol; 2018 Jan; 28(1):265-273. PubMed ID: 28710583 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Evaluation of a metal artifact reduction algorithm and an adaptive image noise optimization filter in the estimation of peri-implant fenestration defects using cone beam computed tomography: an in-vitro study. Bagis N; Kurt MH; Evli C; Camgoz M; Atakan C; Peker Ozturk H; Orhan K Oral Radiol; 2022 Jul; 38(3):325-335. PubMed ID: 34387842 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Impact of the spatial orientation of the patient's head, metal artifact reduction, and tube current on cone-beam computed tomography artifact expression adjacent to a dental implant: A laboratory study using a simulated surgical guide. Barros-Costa M; Barros-Candido JR; Sampaio-Oliveira M; Freitas DQ; Sverzut AT; Oliveira ML Imaging Sci Dent; 2024 Jun; 54(2):191-199. PubMed ID: 38948193 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Are metal artefact reduction algorithms effective to correct cone beam CT artefacts arising from the exomass? Candemil AP; Salmon B; Freitas DQ; Ambrosano GMB; Haiter-Neto F; Oliveira ML Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2019 Mar; 48(3):20180290. PubMed ID: 30540919 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Quantitative analysis of zirconia and titanium implant artefacts in three-dimensional virtual models of multi-slice CT and cone beam CT: does scan protocol matter? Matta RE; Knapp Giacaman S; Wiesmueller M; Lutz R; Uder M; Wichmann M; Seidel A Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2023 Nov; 52(8):20230275. PubMed ID: 37641962 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Evaluation of metal artefact reduction in cone-beam computed tomography images of different dental materials. Queiroz PM; Oliveira ML; Groppo FC; Haiter-Neto F; Freitas DQ Clin Oral Investig; 2018 Jan; 22(1):419-423. PubMed ID: 28536782 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Diagnosis of external root resorption in teeth close and distant to zirconium implants: influence of acquisition parameters and artefacts produced during cone beam computed tomography. Freitas DQ; Nascimento EHL; Vasconcelos TV; Noujeim M Int Endod J; 2019 Jun; 52(6):866-873. PubMed ID: 30585641 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Evaluation of a metal artifact reduction algorithm and an optimization filter in the estimation of peri-implant dehiscence defects by using cone beam computed tomography: an in-vitro study. Bayrak S; Orhan K; Kursun Çakmak ES; Görürgöz C; Odabaşı O; Yilmaz D; Atakan C Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol; 2020 Aug; 130(2):209-216. PubMed ID: 32197878 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Influence of kilovoltage-peak and the metal artifact reduction tool in cone-beam computed tomography on the detection of bone defects around titanium-zirconia and zirconia implants. Fontenele RC; Nascimento EHL; Imbelloni-Vasconcelos AC; Martins LAC; Pontual ADA; Ramos-Perez FMM; Freitas DQ Imaging Sci Dent; 2022 Sep; 52(3):267-273. PubMed ID: 36238703 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Assessment of the efficiency of a pre- versus post-acquisition metal artifact reduction algorithm in the presence of 3 different dental implant materials using multiple CBCT settings: An in vitro study. Shahmirzadi S; Sharaf RA; Saadat S; Moore WS; Geha H; Tamimi D; Demirturk Kocasarac H Imaging Sci Dent; 2021 Mar; 51(1):1-7. PubMed ID: 33828955 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. In vitro assessment of artifacts induced by titanium, titanium-zirconium and zirconium dioxide implants in cone-beam computed tomography. Sancho-Puchades M; Hämmerle CH; Benic GI Clin Oral Implants Res; 2015 Oct; 26(10):1222-8. PubMed ID: 25040484 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Zirconia implants interfere with the evaluation of peri-implant bone defects in cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) images even with artifact reduction, a pilot study. Kuusisto N; Abushahba F; Syrjänen S; Huumonen S; Vallittu P; Närhi T Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2023 Nov; 52(8):20230252. PubMed ID: 37641961 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Evaluation of artifacts generated by zirconium implants in cone-beam computed tomography images. Vasconcelos TV; Bechara BB; McMahan CA; Freitas DQ; Noujeim M Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol; 2017 Feb; 123(2):265-272. PubMed ID: 28086998 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. In vitro assessment of artifacts induced by titanium dental implants in cone beam computed tomography. Benic GI; Sancho-Puchades M; Jung RE; Deyhle H; Hämmerle CH Clin Oral Implants Res; 2013 Apr; 24(4):378-83. PubMed ID: 23106603 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Application of an auto-edge counting method for quantification of metal artifacts in CBCT images: a multivariate analysis of object position, field of view size, tube voltage, and metal artifact reduction algorithm. Khosravifard A; Saberi BV; Khosravifard N; Motallebi S; Kajan ZD; Ghaffari ME Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol; 2021 Dec; 132(6):735-743. PubMed ID: 33975812 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Misfit detection in implant-supported prostheses of different compositions by periapical radiography and cone beam computed tomography: An in vitro study. de-Azevedo-Vaz SL; Araujo-Siqueira C; Carneiro VC; Oliveira ML; Azeredo RA J Prosthet Dent; 2021 Aug; 126(2):205-213. PubMed ID: 32723499 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. The metal post material influences the performance of artefact reduction algorithms in CBCT images. Farias-Gomes A; Fontenele RC; Rosado LPL; Neves FS; Freitas DQ Braz Dent J; 2022; 33(1):31-40. PubMed ID: 35262552 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Accuracy of peri-implant bone evaluation using cone beam CT, digital intra-oral radiographs and histology. Ritter L; Elger MC; Rothamel D; Fienitz T; Zinser M; Schwarz F; Zöller JE Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2014; 43(6):20130088. PubMed ID: 24786136 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Risk assessment of mandibular incisive canal perforation during dental implant surgery in the anterior edentulous mandible: a virtual implant placement study using cone beam computed tomography. Taşdemir I; Kalabalık F; Aytuğar E; Sağlam M Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol; 2023 Dec; 136(6):681-685. PubMed ID: 37612164 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]